Jump to content

Movement Holder for Mark Lovick Lesson 5


GeoMontreal

Recommended Posts

Hello,

I started new lesson 5 about chronograph by Mark Lovick, there’s 3 movement to be used in the lesson, for the valjoux 7750 I found a movement holder quite easily, but for the venus clone and Poljot I don’t know what I should use, on Mark videos he seems to have movement holder fitted for both movement…

 

Thank you,

 

Georges

Edited by GeoMontreal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen Mark use holders specific to the movement. These can be perfect for chronographs since they can allow access to the pushers. 

Do you have an adjustable holder? Seems that would be where to start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depending on how much the movements cost you, and how willing you are to have scratch marks on the movement, I would prefer to use a purpose built movement holder rather than an adjustable one.

I find that with adjustable movement holders, the movement can flip when applying pressure to loosen a screw, if the screw in question happens to be somewhere in the middle of the movement. Also, adjustable metal movement holders can sometimes leave marks  or scratches on the softer brass movement, which can be a concern on more expensive movements.

A purpose built movement holder will support the entire movement all around the circumference of the movement, preventing flipping of the movement. Since it doesn’t use pressure to hold the movement in place, it won’t leave marks or scratches on the movement. More importantly for a chronograph, the purpose built movement holder will have support for specific movement jewels, which is quite important when fitting hands, which require substantial pressure when fitting in a chronograph.

That is not to imply that adjustable movement holders have no use, because they are still useful. You just need to know their limitations. Also, purpose built movement holders for some calibers may be difficult to find, but if you have access to a 3D printer, you can actually make one, although you will have to find some way to make “posts” to support the movement jewels.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, GeoMontreal said:

Thank you for the answer, what are dedicated movement holder size for Venus  (Seagull ST19) movement , and the one for the poljot 3133 ?

As I have no idea where to find them ….

 

Thank you for your  help,

You can probably get those metal ring sort of movement supports, for a specific ligne size, but it wouldn’t support the jewels that need supporting during watch hand placement. It would be debatable whether these sort of metal ring movement holders would be better than the adjustable ones.

I would suggest you contact @Mark if he could tell you where he got his movement holders, or the schematics if he made those himself. It can be difficult to find the right tools when you work with movements that are not as common as the 7750, or Omega 1861 calibers. 3D printing would be the best option if you could get a 3D printer, and make the measurements of the movement so you know where to put the supports.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Tiny said:

How about going by size or lignes  p3133 is Lignes 14 I have found this site for Bergeon holders  https://www.ofrei.com/page1299.html 

st19 is Lignes 13.75

Correct.

In the videos you might observe that I am using a 13 3/4 ligne holder for the ST19 (also for the Poljot 3133) - the Venus 175 is 14 ligne.

Here is the product on Cousins. Expensive, but very low risk to the movement.

https://www.cousinsuk.com/product/by-size-bergeon-5914

 

Screen Shot 2022-06-25 at 12.07.59 PM.png

Screen Shot 2022-06-25 at 12.08.53 PM.png

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Mark said:

Correct.

In the videos you might observe that I am using a 13 3/4 ligne holder for the ST19 (also for the Poljot 3133) - the Venus 175 is 14 ligne.

Here is the product on Cousins. Expensive, but very low risk to the movement.

https://www.cousinsuk.com/product/by-size-bergeon-5914

 

Screen Shot 2022-06-25 at 12.07.59 PM.png

Screen Shot 2022-06-25 at 12.08.53 PM.png

Is there any concern if the chronograph second hand jewel is not supported by a post in the movement holder during hand installation? I notice that most chronograph movement holders use adjustable posts to support certain jewels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, ifibrin said:

Is there any concern if the chronograph second hand jewel is not supported by a post in the movement holder during hand installation

The above are movement holders for assembly and disassembly of the movement, not support for fitting of hands - although sometimes they can be a combined tool, this is not always the case.

It's more of a concern when fitting new hands which will be tight fitting. Hands previously fitted and removed for service do not generally need to be forced down so hard to the extent that a jewel would be pressed out of position. However, if I felt it does need support and I did not have a dedicated hand support holder for my Bergeon 8935 for a particular movement (not all calibers have a specific one available) then I would use a jeweling tool or staking set to support the jewel whilst pressing down, I prefer to use my staking set as I have a particular punch with a soft flat tip which is ideal for the purpose.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Mark said:

The above are movement holders for assembly and disassembly of the movement, not support for fitting of hands - although sometimes they can be a combined tool, this is not always the case.

It's more of a concern when fitting new hands which will be tight fitting. Hands previously fitted and removed for service do not generally need to be forced down so hard to the extent that a jewel would be pressed out of position. However, if I felt it does need support and I did not have a dedicated hand support holder for my Bergeon 8935 for a particular movement (not all calibers have a specific one available) then I would use a jeweling tool or staking set to support the jewel whilst pressing down, I prefer to use my staking set as I have a particular punch with a soft flat tip which is ideal for the purpose.

Ah ok! That makes sense. Although it does sound a bit cumbersome/tedious to have to manually hold the movement in position in a jewelling/staking tool to support the jewel when fitting hands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, ifibrin said:

cumbersome/tedious

There are many cumbersome and tedious tasks in watch repair, this is not one of them in my opinion 😉

Try removing the black tar gaskets from a 1970s Omega for example 😄

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mark said:

There are many cumbersome and tedious tasks in watch repair, this is not one of them in my opinion 😉

Try removing the black tar gaskets from a 1970s Omega for example 😄

 

That’s true! Those tasks sound like they would require nerves of steel. You sound like a very patient man on YouTube, which was what started me on the journey actually.


I’m just trying to imagine how to hold the movement perfectly perpendicular to the base of the jeweling tool, with the correct movement jewel supported on the anvil/stump, while the hand to be fitted is at the correct position on the pivot, and the flat pusher in position to push the hand home on the pivot. Sounds like you would need more than 10 fingers!

Edited by ifibrin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • just one little minor reminder here this isn't your normal balance wheel.  pages 17 and 18 are what you really want to be looking at. normally studs don't turn but this watch has the etachron system designed for lots of adjustment. Personally I would try to rotate the stud back to where it's supposed to be. If you're lucky you didn't actually bend it at the stud it just looks really bad as the stud has been rotated grossly out of position.. I think things will look a lot better if you put the hairspring back where it's supposed to be by rotating the stud. it's hard to tell if you actually did bend it at the stud or not we won't know until you rotate the stud back more or less where it's supposed to be. Then you want to pay attention to the manual of how to put the hairspring back in the regulator pins because yes they rotate also and they rotated specific directions otherwise bad things will happen to your hairspring. so initially you can open up the regulator as wide as it can go and don't worry about closing it until thing everything is right then you can close them a little bit
    • I need to see photos of the whole movement before I comment. 
    • Hi @Jon, so, from one extreme to another the beat error is 0.1(min.pos) to 0.2(msx.pos), and as you mentioned the rate does up and down dramatically. Also checked the position of the collet, and the collet is not central to the jewel on the balance cock. Balance moves freely, per my understanding.   So, after 24h the ampl. fell down by approx 20 deg, which I would assume is expected. After adjusting the endshake I believe I gained around +10 deg. of balance movement. Which is great, and overall the balance is not at 220'ish deg.   What I did next, some might think is non-orthodox, but was wort a try. I too the mainspring out, checked again for endshake and if the pin moves freely, and cleaned everything. Usually when installing the mainspring I would use some barrel grease on the barrel walls, install the spring and put a 2-3 drops of D-5 oil on top of the wounded spring and in the places where the arbor sits. This time I took the spring and applied a ultra this coat of Molykote Dx paste on the whole spring, before installing it in to the barrel, and added some oil to the arbor as usual.  The result improved, at a full wound the balance produces about 230-237 deg. @JohnR725 I'm getting closer to 300 😃   What I am noticing, there is a fluctuation in amplitude. With time it would rise and drop about total 8-10 deg in an interval about 2 minutes. I assumed this ruled out the power transfer from the barrel itself. So I took the gear train out, cleaned and lubed. 
    • Thank you so much, Hector and CJ. I appreciate the tech sheet and the video. Gasp, I think I will make the attempt. What's the worst that can happen? I think there may be a new balance complete in my future, though.  I'll update the post and let you know the result. R, Frank  
    • So here is the new base (v 2.1), I made it so that the base will fit over and swallow the stump of the hand pusher tool (or at least my clone of the tool), I also reduced the OD of the bottom skirt a little as it looked/felt a little large, here are a few pictures and the fake .pdf file which you need to convert to .zip once downloaded.   The cut-out seen on the below image on the bottom of the base should swallow the OD (40 mm, +0.1 mm tolerance) of the stump and the height of the stump 9.5mm (measured to 9.1mm, but rounded to 9.5mm) - let me know if this works for your tool.   Note, I think you may need to print supports for the new internal shelf created? Here is the fake .pdf for just the FreeCAD base file and 3mf files Modular Movement Holder.pdf Here is the fake pdf for complete set of the new base and ring FreeCAD/3mf files: Modular Movement Holder base and ring v 2.1.pdf However, I'm wondering how often you could use this feature, adding the dial usually increases the OD of the movement, so you would need a new (larger) adapter ring tuned to the OD of the dial and I wouldn't like to grip the dial in any kind of movement holder if It could be avoided for fear of damaging it. Maybe I'm misunderstanding you?
×
×
  • Create New...