Jump to content

Zenith Espada Chronograph/Movado Astronic HS 360


Recommended Posts

I’m in the process of servicing this fine model. The glass crystal is well scratched up and the crystal gasket disintegrated to a point beyond recognition. I have yet to be able to find a crystal replacement and will see if I can have it polished.. if anyone knows were I can find a crystal replacement let me know. Assuming I can polish or replace it, the rate limiting factor appears to be sourcing the crystal gasket(s). Does anyone know where to source one or at least how it should look like/dimensions so that hopefully I can find something similar aftermarket? Thanks in advance.

DC915DEE-9AF2-4300-8704-799D63B08C71.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You should disassemble the case first and measure the OD and thickness of the crystal and the ID of the bezel. Then you might find the right parts at cousinsuk.com. The dimensional overlap between bezel, gasket and crystal should be about 0,1mm to get a tight fit.

Edited by Kalanag
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Rasputin said:

will see if I can have it polished.

If needed, as a last measure you can do that yourself quite easily. 

3 hours ago, Rasputin said:

 hopefully I can find something similar aftermarket?

Both glass crystals and their gaskets are made in a large variety of types, and in every possible size. So unless there are very special features on a watch these two items are easily and cheaply replaced. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had to relegate this to my watchmaker who indicated that this requires a unique kind of crystal gasket that he has not seen on other watches.  Unfortunately he does not know exactly how it should look like as the original one melted away.  Hence I'm hoping someone give me some guidance as trying to find an OEM replacement has been a struggle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Rasputin said:

I had to relegate this to my watchmaker who indicated that this requires a unique kind of crystal gasket that he has not seen on other watches.

Can you post clear pictures of the crystal profile, all its dimensions, and same for the case opening. That is done measuring with a vernier or digital caliper. 

Edited by jdm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you confirm that the difference between the case opening and the crystal major diameter is 0.14mm that makes a gap in between the two of 0.07mm, that is too little for a nylon (or any material) gasket, which start at 0.4mm. It could be that the crystal is to be glued instead. The other possibility would be that the crystal is held on the smaller step, but I doubt that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/23/2022 at 9:47 AM, jdm said:

If you confirm that the difference between the case opening and the crystal major diameter is 0.14mm that makes a gap in between the two of 0.07mm, that is too little for a nylon (or any material) gasket, which start at 0.4mm. It could be that the crystal is to be glued instead. The other possibility would be that the crystal is held on the smaller step, but I doubt that.

Are you sure glue would be used considering it's likely a water resistant case with a screw down crown and case back?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Rasputin said:

Are you sure glue would be used considering it's likely a water resistant case with a screw down crown and case back?

I am just saying that no gasket will fit and the logical consequence is that it has to be glued. Which if done correctly allows no water to enter. The fact that you found the original gasket disintegrated, as in leaving only small debris is consistent with the above. 

BTW, screw down crown and case back are simply features of quality construction, back then as now normally found in dress watches as well. These in itself do not guarantee impermeability, nitryl gaskets do. And in chronos water has also another major way of entering, from the pushers. 

Edited by jdm
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • although not in this case.  It was the Lugano Convention and its deficiencies that allowed a Swiss court decision in the first place.  This isnt really a Brexit issue at all.  A decision that affects both the EU and the UK should never have been heard in Switzerland. I bet the authorised service centres in the UK are pretty pleased.  It's a massive shame, though; I believe watch owners should be able to choose to have their watch serviced by whoever they trust.
    • Hi guys I think that old hippy is correct, it opens the gates for china to manufacture aftermarket spare parts. considering that they already do work on behalf of the Swiss I guess this decision gives the a little more legitimacy to tool up and I am sure they will take advantage of the situation either with or without the blessing of the Swiss watch industry  Having read about the protectionist machinations of the Swiss in the history of Europe they were the only ones to get fat at everybody else’s expense. I think the outcome could have been guessed at but ,  fair play to Cousins UK for standing up to them.  Now the question,  will everybody boycott Swiss watches and Swatch, no way they will still fill their coffers.  Me I stick with the Japanese once renowned for cheap shitty watches who came good through industrial effort and don’t for get the Russians that most dismiss as low grade crap. Wouldn’t buy a swatch product ever how about you all.? a
    • Hold the crown when in winding position, move the click away from the crown wheel, and then while holding the crown let it slowly unwind. I recollect that you must remove the automatic device bridge first, but maybe I'm wrong. You can first try without removing the automatic device bridge.
    • nevenbekriev- You nailed it with your description of me and my reaction when the clock started ticking again. I am a newbie.  I love the sound and idea of mechanical clocks but the idea of owning one and trying to keep them running has never appealed to me. My wife bought this one and an antique German wall clock.  When I looked into having someone repair them for me, the universal response was "it's really expensive to work on them, you should just replace the movement". So, I had nothing to lose, I started researching them and opened them up. The wife is happy because she hears the sound of the clocks again. But I have gone down the "accuracy" rabbit hole. In the vertical position, the balance wheel was not floating. It was sitting on the bottom of the frame. I adjusted the lower spring collet and got it floating. It easily passed the 270 degree 3 to 5 minute oscillation test. It took 8 minutes for the wheel to completely stop moving.  I put it the unit back in the movement and checked the safety pin. It does not touch the safety roller anywhere in +/-270 degrees rotation from neutral position. But the amplitude of the rotation with the spring fully wound is weak based on what you are saying. It rotates +/-90 degrees from the neutral position.  No, I did not take the movement completely apart.  That seemed way outside my skill set at the time. There is a reason I became an electrical engineer and not a mechanical engineer. I am much more comfortable with moving electrons than tiny moving metal parts. Will I do it in the long run? Anything can happen. I don't seem to be able to let it go.
×
×
  • Create New...