Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I’ve just started tinkering with mechanical watches and I’d appreciate help/input from the more experienced people here

 

I bought a cheap Seiko 7005 watch from eBay to experiment with. The watch was running (albeit not very accurately) when it arrived but the power reserve wasn’t good

 

I stripped down the movement to inspect the parts and prepare for cleaning

 

The first stages of the strip down were fine. I was following Seiko’s documentation and various videos on YouTube. However I became confused when I got to the stage where I needed to remove power from the movement so I could detach the ratchet wheel

 

I know that power removal involves disengaging the click from the ratchet wheel. However I discovered that the click in my 7005 had snapped and was never engaged with the wheel in the first instance. All that’s left of my click is the stepped part that slots into the base plate, the ‘arm’ of the click that actually engages with the wheel has gone. I’m guessing that the click was broken by the last person to open the case

 

This isn’t a problem per se, a replacement click for a 7005 won’t break the bank

 

My question: How come the movement could run without a click? I thought the click was crucial to the watch being wound. How could my 7005 wind itself without a click? Am I missing something here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's because the auto-winding mechanism also prevents the mainspring to unwind by itself. In fact, to unwind the MS in these watches you need to first remove the 2nd reduction wheel and then you can hold the click and unwind it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, aac58 said:

That's because the auto-winding mechanism also prevents the mainspring to unwind by itself. In fact, to unwind the MS in these watches you need to first remove the 2nd reduction wheel and then you can hold the click and unwind it.

That makes sense, thanks aac58

 

As an extension question, why does a 7005 have a click if the auto-winding mechanism also prevents the mainspring unwinding by itself?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kingsie said:

That makes sense, thanks aac58

 

As an extension question, why does a 7005 have a click if the auto-winding mechanism also prevents the mainspring unwinding by itself?

Because the click is designed to hold the spring and the winding mechanism is not, although it does. Probably it's standing a pressure (against the winding direction) that should be supported by the click instead, and that might affect other characteristics, for example the ability to self-wind or the wear of the pawl lever tips and the 2nd reduction wheel teeth. That could explain a poor power reserve, but here I'm just guessing.

Edited by aac58
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, aac58 said:

Because the click is designed to hold the spring and the winding mechanism is not, although it does. Probably it's standing a pressure (against the winding direction) that should be supported by the click instead, and that might affect other characteristics, for example the ability to self-wind or the wear of the pawl lever tips and the 2nd reduction wheel teeth. That could explain a poor power reserve, but here I'm just guessing.

Logical reasoning, thanks

 

I'll give you guys a shout if I need more help with the 7005's rebuild

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just a note for those who come searching for information on this topic in the future.  I did eventually find the Mark's video on how to replace these springs, as someone observed, he does in fact make the replacement look easy.  (It actually is relatively easy once you have the knack of it.) If you're enrolled in one of Mark's online courses, the demonstration of how to replace this spring is in the Bonus Videos section of his course site, and is called "C2B1 – Sea-Gull Style Shock Springs".
    • If the metal was twice as thick, it wouldn't snap so easily.  The thickness is governed by the space available so you can't use thicker metal.  If you glued two pieces together, the likelihood of snapping would be reduced.  That's my theory anyway, could be wrong. 
    • there are various approaches to learning watch repair. A lot of people want to jump right in and every single watches something to be repaired restored. But other times like this it's disposable it's here for you to learn and when you're through learning you throw it away. yes you definitely should try this you have a learning movement you need to learn and the best way to learn is by doing something.
    • Sorry, the friction will be so great that the wheel will barely turn, if the movement will start at all, the amplitude will be verry lo.
    • If I can’t re-pivot the wheel, the logical thing to do is to descend the pivot hole.  Plan is to either stick a suitably sized hole jewel (from a barrel bridge or something) or fashion a blob of epoxy on the underside of the escape wheel cock so the wheel sits on its one pivot on the base plate and the staff with the broken off pivot (which I’ll polish as best as I can) becomes the upper pivot. As long as it doesn’t foul the 4th wheel it should work? I know it’s a bodge job, and if this were a rare movement, or belonged to someone else I would not do this. I’m just interested to see if I can get the thing to run. 
×
×
  • Create New...