Jump to content

Seiko 6309-602A wrong calibre?


Recommended Posts

Just got one of these, imagine my surprise on opening it and finding an FE5612 movement inside, hmmm a Franken you are thinking, well maybe but this watch is far from new in well worn but good condition, I am guessing that some enterprising watch maker substituted this rather than repair the original movement or maybe another reason ? is it possible that Seiko themselves did? never heard of that before but this watch has never been to India lol and every thing else is correct and the movement looks like it was designed to fit or is it just that this particular FE movement is just identical to the original, who knows I am perplexed and wondering if I should proceed to service it, the FE calibre to my mind is every bit as good if not better than the original in my mind.

 

Graeme

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah my thinking too, being a bit of a perverse person I will probably go ahead and restore it with the FE movement, just because you can, still a nice looking piece.

At the end of the day collectors like me will be appalled but your average watch wearer wouldn't know or care.

I am a bit of a purist however and this would be the first watch that I have let slip thru out of the hundreds that I have restored as faithfully as I can.

My main reason is that in my mind Seiko litters the planet with soso watch movements ie non manual wind non hacking  auto modern movements that anything that has these features is a step up, 7S26 springs to mind as a completely forgettable Seiko movement that has been over used in some " Desirable " watches such as Divers and the like.

Don't get me wrong I just bought a brand new Seiko Padi GMT dive watch a few days ago and have a few in the collection but well Seiko gets praise out of step with its offerings at times.

Edited by ghce
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a "Mumbai special" Frankenwatch. With Seiko movements being so cheap, you wonder why they bother. 

There's nothing wrong with the 6309 - you can get reasonable performance from them, and parts are cheap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I received one of these frankens and I think it predates the ebay/franken thing. On the watch I came across the case, dial and strap looked good and it was only whenI opened it up I saw the FE movement. The reason I say it predates the Mumbai specials is the dial feet was quite professionally done to the extent I figured the whole dial was fake. And the quality of the dial, well not exactly up to the standard of Patek, but it was much better that anything from the sub-continent.

I got the watch in a job lot of Seikos and this was the only oddball.  Will post some pics up here later.

Anilv

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I need to see photos of the whole movement before I comment. 
    • Hi @Jon, so, from one extreme to another the beat error is 0.1(min.pos) to 0.2(msx.pos), and as you mentioned the rate does up and down dramatically. Also checked the position of the collet, and the collet is not central to the jewel on the balance cock. Balance moves freely, per my understanding.   So, after 24h the ampl. fell down by approx 20 deg, which I would assume is expected. After adjusting the endshake I believe I gained around +10 deg. of balance movement. Which is great, and overall the balance is not at 220'ish deg.   What I did next, some might think is non-orthodox, but was wort a try. I too the mainspring out, checked again for endshake and if the pin moves freely, and cleaned everything. Usually when installing the mainspring I would use some barrel grease on the barrel walls, install the spring and put a 2-3 drops of D-5 oil on top of the wounded spring and in the places where the arbor sits. This time I took the spring and applied a ultra this coat of Molykote Dx paste on the whole spring, before installing it in to the barrel, and added some oil to the arbor as usual.  The result improved, at a full wound the balance produces about 230-237 deg. @JohnR725 I'm getting closer to 300 😃   What I am noticing, there is a fluctuation in amplitude. With time it would rise and drop about total 8-10 deg in an interval about 2 minutes. I assumed this ruled out the power transfer from the barrel itself. So I took the gear train out, cleaned and lubed. 
    • Thank you so much, Hector and CJ. I appreciate the tech sheet and the video. Gasp, I think I will make the attempt. What's the worst that can happen? I think there may be a new balance complete in my future, though.  I'll update the post and let you know the result. R, Frank  
    • So here is the new base (v 2.1), I made it so that the base will fit over and swallow the stump of the hand pusher tool (or at least my clone of the tool), I also reduced the OD of the bottom skirt a little as it looked/felt a little large, here are a few pictures and the fake .pdf file which you need to convert to .zip once downloaded.   The cut-out seen on the below image on the bottom of the base should swallow the OD (40 mm, +0.1 mm tolerance) of the stump and the height of the stump 9.5mm (measured to 9.1mm, but rounded to 9.5mm) - let me know if this works for your tool.   Note, I think you may need to print supports for the new internal shelf created? Here is the fake .pdf for just the FreeCAD base file and 3mf files Modular Movement Holder.pdf Here is the fake pdf for complete set of the new base and ring FreeCAD/3mf files: Modular Movement Holder base and ring v 2.1.pdf However, I'm wondering how often you could use this feature, adding the dial usually increases the OD of the movement, so you would need a new (larger) adapter ring tuned to the OD of the dial and I wouldn't like to grip the dial in any kind of movement holder if It could be avoided for fear of damaging it. Maybe I'm misunderstanding you?
    • Hi Frank, you have dived headlong into the deep end. Hairspring work has to be the scariest thing a newbie has to tackle. Your hairspring appears to be bent and just putting it back into the regulator would not allow the balance to work properly. It might start oscillating but the performance would not be good. The proper thing to do is to unstud the hairspring, remove the hairspring from the balance, reinstall the hairspring on the stud carrier, reshape the endcurve and centre the collet to the balance jewel hole. This challenge would either make you or break you. Hope that you will be able to fix your watch. Welcome to the world of watchmaking.  Watch this video. It think it'll give you an idea of the task ahead. From your 1st photo, I think you have a etachron type stud. Let me see if I can find a video on how to remove it from the arm.
×
×
  • Create New...