Jump to content

Is Welby 400 day clock made by Kundo?


Recommended Posts

Hi LWS  The besy way to confirm it is a good clear picture of the backplate without the suspension guard on. We can then compare it to the illustrations in the Charles Trewilliger book, It has pics onf all the backplates. This is why this book is a must when dealing with these clocks as is the adjustment tool makes life a lot easier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, watchweasol said:

Hi LWS  The besy way to confirm it is a good clear picture of the backplate without the suspension guard on. We can then compare it to the illustrations in the Charles Trewilliger book, It has pics onf all the backplates. This is why this book is a must when dealing with these clocks as is the adjustment tool makes life a lot easier.

Yeah, I am gonna just bite the bullet and buy the book.  There are several editions.  How late (in terms of editions) do you think I need to go...assuming I buy it on the used market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Back on this project after getting the Horolovar book.  The clock I have matches Plate 1579B which directs me to Unit 23B suspension spring setup.

Nope, way too long. 

Is this an error, or am I missing something?

I have ninth edition of the book because the tenth was not in stock where I looked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plate 1579B is for a Welby Corporation clock. On pp179 ( edition 10)shows the plate templates to be used to get the correct length. Unit set up is either 5C,5D or 5E. Measured the total lengths as follows 5C is a touch under 95mm 5D is 95mm and 5E is a touch over 95mm.

970868D5-9A50-4FC3-ADAD-4F07B684B407.thumb.jpeg.106b9a3d4b139e2af673cdb7bb7280f7.jpeg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is vital that the fork is in the correct position other wise it will flutter and cause the clock to gain, fluttering is when m several escape teeth escape at the same time. A tiny drop of oil each side of the long tail of the pallets that goes between the forks will prevent friction it will help with the action.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

It is vital that the fork is in the correct position other wise it will flutter and cause the clock to gain, fluttering is when m several escape teeth escape at the same time. A tiny drop of oil each side of the long tail of the pallets that goes between the forks will prevent friction it will help with the action.  

I have it adjusted with no flutter, but I did this iteratively (the book was no help) until enough rotation was achieved and enough power delivered to the pendulum to keep running.   I also oiled both sides of the pallets.  I have also adjusted the beat (visually).  It is running and this morning, I installed the hands so I can see how well it keeps time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Strange my book 10th edition shows a different movement (see pic) for that number it also does not have a Welby Corp.  (16x36).

HOWEVER a Uhrenfabrik M. Reiner movement to which is almost identical with a 16x 36 size plate No 1672 see pic. I would bet this is the spec you need for the spring.C7511F03-E647-457F-BD3D-4123D0D68E5A.thumb.jpeg.1e65878ca683d3f71865d0d6a189626f.jpeg

9E006CCE-363D-439A-9268-C66A776CDA1C.thumb.jpeg.46d748ff9a336eff0c0dcdc711e02e5a.jpeg

 

 

Edited by clockboy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mysteries abound.  The Reiner plate you show from Ed 10, also gives a different spring thickness as you noted.  I bought and installed the spring listed in the page I posted--a significant difference!!

This morning, I found Ed 10 on ebay for a good price and it is on its way.  I will put them together on my bookshelf along with a suitable coin!

Edited by LittleWatchShop
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depending how fast it is running it is possible to thin a suspension spring. I have done it by pulling the spring in between two buff sticks. Obviously care has to be taken not too twist or snap the spring but I can confirm it does work. I cannot remember the make of 400 day clock I was working on but changing to the next lowest strength spring was too far so I had to just thin the original spring. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different.
    • @JohnR725 now that you've mentioned it. This is actually the second aftermarket spring (same place and brand) I ordered as the first one broke. The eye on which the arbor pulls on, broke off on the first spring after the first wind, and also it was a bit to large for the arbor. Looked like on one the second picture in the 2nd group. The second one was exactly the same, I had to bend it a bit, to give it a more prominent curve to the end of the spring so that the arbor catches the eye.  Also I believe both were 5-10mm shorter. Not that I writing that, I feel a bit dumb, as the spring might actually been the problem all along, although its advertised as a substitute to the original...     
    • The CS70 is the only one they show as annealed.  A further search on ebay, I found CS75 and CS100 annealed carbon steel strips  e.g. https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/314072784422
    • Aloha and thanks for catching all these small but important details, John.  I'm going to give it a shot. The good news is I have a parts movement here with a perfect complete balance.  I will place them side by side for visual reference when doing what you outlined.  It's been a while were I've had a hobby in which I joined a forum.  I forgot just how helpful everyone can be. Mahalo. Frank.
    • Mike if you wanna drop me your address I'll send you a strip of this cs 100 in an envelope . I'd like your opinion of its workability  The cs100 might be better carbon is 1%
×
×
  • Create New...