Jump to content

Questions about K&D staking set


Recommended Posts

I recently picked up this staking set on eBay and I'm trying to go through it to organize the stakes. As expected, there have been some replacements over the years.

Two things I'm trying to figure out. First, most of the set is numbered S1, S2, S3...through S104. I can't find those in any of the historical K&D documentation. For example, S1 and S2 are pictured below, but every piece of documentation I've found shows #1 as the set punch, then it goes to #7. I'm curious partly for the history of them, and also so I can have an idea of how everything fits together so I can organize them intelligently. Does anyone have a parts list that includes these numbers?

Second question: the set came with a bunch of short stakes, about 2cm long by 4mm in diameter, along with a holder that's threaded at one end. Are these part of something else entirely? It looks like the holder threads into a handle, kind of like a collet chuck.

Thanks for any help!

20220416_155957.jpg

20220416_160025.jpg

IMG_20220402_181623.jpg

20220402_184033.jpg

kd2.jpg

kd.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi all.  I have just received a similar K&D staking set in the post and wondered if the knurled knob on the top of the frame should move.  If it should, mine is very much stuck.  Just thought I would ask before I force things.   Cheers, John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, JAHM said:

Hi all.  I have just received a similar K&D staking set in the post and wondered if the knurled knob on the top of the frame should move.  If it should, mine is very much stuck.  Just thought I would ask before I force things.   Cheers, John

Does not move on any of my sets...one of which is k&d.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ManSkirtBrew, the S numbering does not match what I have on my sets.  Mine only have numbers for the most part that correspond to the K&D numbering on the K&D set.  Not sure if maybe they used that numbering scheme sometime in the past.

The round face punches you showed correspond to something like 79, 80 in my K&D 18R inverto set.  But regardless of the numbering system as long as you have a good selection of punches and stumps, you will likely find what you are looking for.

Here are a few of links that might be useful or at least interesting.

https://kanddinverto.weebly.com

https://tadelstein.com/Cross-over-punches.pdf

https://tadelstein.com/Staking Tools and How to Use Them 1910 - 163p BW - S.pdf

 

And a few pages of descriptions of the tools included.

page28.thumb.jpg.70ae7ca081111ab580cdfef317b322b9.jpg

page29.thumb.jpg.e12de68a5392ff64745c0cc6c4c6213b.jpg

page30.thumb.jpg.a5ce8843f03a42cf9d9de733c78bd36e.jpg

Cheers

Terry

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe they are older than you think! If you go to the curated archive site at https://kanddinverto.weebly.com and look at the earliest catalogs in the References section, the punch numbers are sequential starting at 1 for the set punch and they go forward without any skipping. The codes also differ for the various sets such that some numbering schemes include a leading letter.  I didn't see "S" but complete catalogs for all years aren't available there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the comment LitttleWatchShop regarding the movement of the knurled knob and sleeve at the top of the frame.  Strange that it would be knurled like it was supposed to move. At the moment the stakes won't slide through easily, so a bit of cleaning of the rust pitting is on the cards.  Thanks again, John   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On my Moseley staking set the knurled knob is for adjusting the sliding friction on the stake. It is locked in place by a screw. The idea is that you want the friction adjusted so that the stake will stay in place and not just fall down, but still be loose enough that it doesn't interfere with punching. 

 

IMG_20220801_081036.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the response. That's what I would have expected but the K&D has no locking screw.  At this stage I will clean it up and see what happens. It may just be a force fitted during production and not meant to move.  It works as is, so I won't try forcing things for fear of breaking it.  Thanks again, John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 7/31/2022 at 9:57 AM, TimeWerks said:

regardless of the numbering system as long as you have a good selection of punches and stumps, you will likely find what you are looking for

Thank you for the very informative response, Terry! I do have a very fine assortment--probably more than I'll ever need at my hobby level. It was mostly the engineer and historian in me that wants to know where they came from and what I'm missing...so they can be properly organized in the box 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • All Done, Here are the finished pictures: This one shows the generic "one-size-fits-all" base which accepts the bespoke rings - notice that the parametric movement OD (27.40 mm) automatically prints on the ring 🙂 From another angle: Here is the ring about to go into the base: And finally the base and ring together: Here it is next to a pen for scale: On my system with 20% fill each ring will take about 18 mins to print, but I am sure this could be optimised: Here is the screenshot of the spreadsheet in FreeCAD, you just need to change one value to create the ring in cell C3, (the base doesn't need any changes). I'll upload the files to printables in due course, but here whey are as a fake pdf, please change the .pdf to .zip to make the file work once downloaded: Modular Movement Holder.pdf Any feedback welcome!     I'm also going to make a parametric ring insert for rectangular/oval movements - but I just finished a parent teacher evening so too tired now 🙂  
    • I'm going to give that a go next time, thanks for a great idea @rossjackson01 One of my students uses this tool and swears by it https://www.cousinsuk.com/product/wheel-hand-roller-remover-bergeon?code=W1851 which is very like getting two sticks of pegwood under the wheel and rolling them in your fingers so they create a slight prying from underneath motion, I suppose. Maybe bind one end of the two sticks of pegwood so they are like tweezers.
    • Thank you. I spent a lot of time on that.   It never ceases to amaze me that there are so many slight adjustments that can be made to the chronograph mechanism through setting the eccentric studs to get them all to a concerto, like an orchestra with everything in time and to its most optimum. Understanding that setting one stud to the desired effect may throw another out is the fun of working on vintage chronographs. Great pic of the 3133 dart tooth interaction and tilt of the tooth. I love working on 3133s. Slightly better than the 7733 in my opinion and you get a date at 6!
    • Thanks Richard The stem is 0.6mm wide. At least the part that the crown goes onto. Is that enough info to order a new stem and crown and look a pics of the stem so check that the part that goes into the keyless works matches the one I have? Asking out of ignorance! Cheers, Nick
    • Probably Chinese, you can measure the stem you have. 
×
×
  • Create New...