Jump to content

New User, New Interest


clone5

Recommended Posts

Hi

Just dipping my toe into this hobby and no doubt will open up a rabbit hole of which I will never return.

It all started with a youtube video and then multiple then different channels. Now I am hooked and would love to accomplish what I have seen

I had forgotten that I received my great grandfather's 18K gold pocket watch ages ago, and would like to get it running but it is currently way above my pay grade. Whilst I cannot identify it yet, the movement is roughly 35mm across, has a self winder of a design I have not seen before, and I think is a minute repeater style. I will post pictures.

Of what I can see there is a barrel bridge screw missing which may be stuck somewhere inside causing the stoppage. It needs a new crystal of which the aperture is 38mm.

I would love to work up the skills to strip, clean and reassemble this timepiece and would welcome and feedback on it's age and identity.

Regards

Josh

20220406_154748[1].jpg

20220406_154854[1].jpg

20220406_154826[1].jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the intro @clone5, welcome to the WRT forum! I'm also relatively new and I'm in the middle of my first service of an Elgin Grade 313 movement.

Your grandfather's watch is gorgeous! Like you I was encouraged by various YT videos and I'm in the middle of a revival of a purchased Elgin. I keep feeling like I need more tools...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Took me a bit of poking around, but I would bet good money that it was made by Henry Sandoz of Le Locle.  With two hammers, it would be a quarter-, five-, or minute-repeater.  It is also a flyback chronometer (those fine-toothed wheels atop the barrel bridge and third wheel bar).  I have to agree whole-heartedly with you: that is not a beginner's watch.  There are experts who turn pale if a customer should bring one in.  Parts will not be easy to come by.  But take heart: later on, with more experience, you can take your time.  You won't have a deadline like some repair technicians.  And you can take plenty of pictures as you go.
Disclaimer: as to the maker, I am NOT an expert nor an appraiser.  I'm only making an educated guess.  But I do happen to be a fan of Sandoz and his method of constructing repeaters, and I have worked on one of his.  In my own personal opinion, that watch has his style all over it.  But I could still be wrong.  I believe his layout was also copied by others. If I had to guess a year of manufacture on it, I'd speculate mid- to late-1900s, but maybe not 'teens.
EDIT: smashing watch, BTW.  The more I look at it, the more I think it could actually be from the 'teens.  Out of curiosity, does it run at all?  Does the balance swing evenly and with no wobble to speak of?

Edited by KarlvonKoln
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, KarlvonKoln said:

EDIT: smashing watch, BTW.  The more I look at it, the more I think it could actually be from the 'teens.  Out of curiosity, does it run at all?  Does the balance swing evenly and with no wobble to speak of?

 

Thank you Karl. I have been wondering what make this pocket watch is and perhaps this is a Henry Sandoz of Le Locle. I will keep searching.

Currently it is a non-runner however as you can see in the video, it was running for a short time. If you listen closely you can actually hear the movement. I did not closely check the balance but it does look full of life. After this video was shot at the end of March 2022, I packed it up and put it away again letting it run down on its own. I have taken it out again and tried to put some wind into the main spring but it didn't start up.

Seeing it run gives me hop that it will will clean up and run eventually.

Thanks again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it was running before, and nothing else has happened to it since then, then the likelihood is great that a careful cleaning and fresh oil will bring it back to full health.  But I would not blame you if you wanted to wait a while until you had more experience and felt ready.  That is wisest.  For something like this, you must really plan ahead.  Make sure you will have all the tools you will need; be prepared to take plenty of pictures as you go along; research the functioning of such mechanisms to understand why the parts are placed where they are, and what they do, and how they do it.  And never forget: a pocket watch has many parts which are delicate and easily broken - a repeater even more so.  But with a repeater, it is so much harder to get replacements for a broken part.  When the time comes, you probably already know that you will need to be extra careful.  But I have faith that your time will come to do this.  And the watch will tick merrily again. Patience pays dividends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh nice. I have a similar wedge style stump for my staking tool, so I'll give that a shot. Thanks!
    • Thank you all for the replies!  Very informative! True enough, the Gamsol took some time to evaporate and does leave a residue. So not all naphtha are created equal!  Need to find alternatives then. i was able to try Hexane recommended by Alex and it seems great.  I wonder what the cons are?
    • Yeah, I saw that in the tech sheet but I don't see how it can be adequately cleaned with the friction pinion still in place. I've accidentally pulled the arbor right out of the wheel once when I used a presto tool to try and remove it. Mark shows how he does it with the Platax tool. Those are a little too pricey for me so I got one of these from Aliexpress and I just push down on the arbor with the end of my brass tweezers. That usually gets it most of the way out and then I just grab the wheel with one hand the and the friction pinion with the other and gently rotate them until it pops off. Probably not the best way but it's seemed to work for me so far.    
    • Thanks, Jon Sounds like a plan. Obviously I'll have the face on so do you think gripping with the holder will create any problems, but I will check in the morning to see how feasible it is but I assume it only needs to be lightly held. As for holding the movement instead of the holder won't be possible in this scenario as one hand will be puling on the stem while the other pushes the spring down. That was my initial concern is how the hell can I do this with only one pair of hands. All the other times I've had to remove the stem hasn't been a problem, apart from the force required to release the stem from the setting lever, but now I need to fit the face and hands its sent me into panic mode. If it had the screw type release things would be a lot simpler but that's life 😀   Another thing I will need to consider is once the dial and hands are fitted and the movement is sitting in the case I will need to turn it over to put the case screws in. I saw a vid on Wristwatch revival where he lightly fitted the crystal and bezel so he could turn it over, is this the only option or is there another method?      
    • Hi Jon, do You think that relation spring torque - amplitude is linear? I would rather guess that the amplitude should be proportional to the square of the torque. I had once idea to check it, but still haven't.
×
×
  • Create New...