Jump to content

Recommended Posts

On 3/22/2022 at 6:08 AM, Paul80 said:

A well made tool with 50 Stakes and 10 Anvils, all machines to a high standard with size code etched on each stake, codes seem to match those supplied by Bergeon etc.

Only used it a few times sofar but it did everything expected without any issues.

I have been interested in this staking kit as my "first" kit, but having no prior experience, it's difficult to tell if the included punches would suit my primary use for it - pocket watch balance staff replacement. When comparing against a vintage K&D set with 150+ stakes, it's difficult to know what pieces are essential. On the other hand, a vintage set can be only about $100 more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 6/13/2022 at 1:32 AM, Neverenoughwatches said:

Any thoughts on this ? Use of ? i have an idea with a little addition and adaption Accuracy of ?        

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/133518805304?mkcid=16&mkevt=1&mkrid=711-127632-2357-0&ssspo=kM93z78PTHW&sssrc=2349624&ssuid=tBiLZaCfRb2&var=&widget_ver=artemis&media=COPY

 

On 6/13/2022 at 2:08 AM, gbyleveldt said:

What makes a micrometer designed for "watchmaking" so special? Is it that the measuring faces are larger than standard micrometers?

I have owned this micrometer 3-4 years for a different purpose, before I started working with watches. I play the oboe, and we hand make all our own reeds. A dial micrometer is used to gouge the middle out of a piece of bamboo-like reed cane to a precise thickness (0.58mm-0.59mm for my taste). So mine has small bead shaped tips ideal for measuring a concave surface. It works okay but its mechanical action feels a little janky & stiff. I paid about $25 USD.

I also own a Mitutoyo of the same style for maybe $150 USD. The mechanical action on the Mitutoyo is much smoother and easier to engage but it can also be harder to get a stable reading because it's so sensitive. It consistently reads 0.01mm lower than the cheap one but I've never checked with a feeler steel as to which is closer to the truth. I'm not a pro player so the margin of error isn't a big deal for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/13/2022 at 9:08 AM, gbyleveldt said:

What makes a micrometer designed for "watchmaking" so special? Is it that the measuring faces are larger than standard micrometers?

The ability of measuring minuscule parts using two hands, that is, spring operated and benchtop. And the anvils are shaped for this purpose, actually there is two sets of them.

https://www.cousinsuk.com/product/micrometer-bench-top-kafer-germany

Edited by jdm
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jdm said:

The ability of measuring minuscule parts using two hands, that is, spring operated and benchtop. And the anvils are shaped for this purpose, actually there is two sets of them.

https://www.cousinsuk.com/product/micrometer-bench-top-kafer-germany

Like this jdm and been looking at those for a while, good for measuring jewels or anything that requires a table to sit on or not particularly easy to hold with tweezers. I use this which is great for measuring stems and staffs very accurately 

1659045498159125457591347559674.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, MechanicMike said:

question: for measuring pivots, jeweled gauge plate or bench micrometer?

Either is fine. If have both, that gives you a comparison mean for extra accuracy. In the end is a personal preference to have more or less of redundant / specialized / fancy tools. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, jdm said:

Either is fine. If have both, that gives you a comparison mean for extra accuracy. In the end is a personal preference to have more or less of redundant / specialized / fancy tools. 

i have the former, but looked at the link you gave. spendy little creatures but well worth it I suppose. I have a digital micrometer and calipers but I find it difficult to measure-fussy and fiddly. i may just look into a bench mic in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
On 7/29/2022 at 5:55 AM, jdm said:

Either is fine. If have both, that gives you a comparison mean for extra accuracy. In the end is a personal preference to have more or less of redundant / specialized / fancy tools. 

what are the increments on your plate gauge? my numbers start at 7 and end with 50 in 1/2 increments. so would that mean .07mm to .5mm in .5mm increments? im just so used to dealing in imperial measurements sometimes this has had me confused. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/29/2022 at 12:31 AM, MechanicMike said:

question: for measuring pivots, jeweled gauge plate or bench micrometer?

I would recommend a Seitz jewelled pivot gauge for measuring pivots and avoid using a bench micrometre for the reason stated by @nickelsilver in the below-linked post. I only use my bench micrometre and/or my JKA-Feintaster for measuring the outer diameter of the jewels.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/19/2022 at 4:27 AM, VWatchie said:

I would recommend a Seitz jewelled pivot gauge for measuring pivots

I recently purchased one but I'm so used to reading in inches this one has me a bit confused although I think I've got it. The range is 7 to 50 which I take is .07 mm to .50 mm? is that the correct way to read  it? Spendy little critters thats for sure but worth it.2134298101_Seitzjewelgauge-straightener.thumb.jpg.58ce61e6c4ba4ce6102838c4b71ad859.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/28/2022 at 5:31 PM, MechanicMike said:

question: for measuring pivots, jeweled gauge plate or bench micrometer?

I have a jka feintaster and the Bergeon tool shown up above, and I have a Seitz jewel plate.  I also have a smaller vintage micrometer that resolves to 10 microns.  When turning a staff (posted in another thread), I use the smaller micrometer because I can make a measurement while the staff is chucked up.  The JKA is invaluable for doing the various measurements between various points on a staff, but it has to be removed from the chuck (which I avoid at all cost).

When finishing the recent staff, I used the jewel plate to make sure the pivots were sized correctly.

This brings me to my latest dilemma.  How do you measure the linear dimension of a staff while chucked up?  What is needed is a depth measurement tool that is small.  Well, I have no such tool, so I fought with this.  Finally, I used the depth measurement feature of my Mitutoyo.  Wow...what a clunky method, but it kinda worked.

I have ordered this tool and it should arrive soon.  Will see how it works.  I wish the wings were shorter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dadistic said:

Facing a similar dilemma, I'm going to try something based on a tip from Jerry Keiffer. Pin gages, as in something like this -

https://www.mscdirect.com/product/details/40427296

I'm going to try and use them as a reference when machining.  

I like.  Mainly because these would be good to test my collets for trueness.  I like the feeler gauge Idea of @praezisand I already have some of them...probably English though

Just ordered some metric gauges!!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, LittleWatchShop said:

I like.  Mainly because these would be good to test my collets for trueness.  I like the feeler gauge Idea of @praezisand I already have some of them...probably English though

Just ordered some metric gauges!!

 

Yes. I had the same thought, as I now have a bunch of used collets that I need to evaluate. I didn't think of the feeler gauge, but that's a great idea too. Thanks @praezis!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

I have a jka feintaster and the Bergeon tool shown up above, and I have a Seitz jewel plate.  I also have a smaller vintage micrometer that resolves to 10 microns.  When turning a staff (posted in another thread), I use the smaller micrometer because I can make a measurement while the staff is chucked up.  The JKA is invaluable for doing the various measurements between various points on a staff, but it has to be removed from the chuck (which I avoid at all cost).

When finishing the recent staff, I used the jewel plate to make sure the pivots were sized correctly.

This brings me to my latest dilemma.  How do you measure the linear dimension of a staff while chucked up?  What is needed is a depth measurement tool that is small.  Well, I have no such tool, so I fought with this.  Finally, I used the depth measurement feature of my Mitutoyo.  Wow...what a clunky method, but it kinda worked.

I have ordered this tool and it should arrive soon.  Will see how it works.  I wish the wings were shorter.

there are ones that exist out there with shorter feet, some even having one short foot, for easier access. but I'm curious-do you have a known stop or zero point you can take a measurement from the depth micrometer? yes, sounds kinda clunky and fiddly. 

does your jewel plate measure in the way I stated above? i'm trying to find out because i think I'm reading it wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, MechanicMike said:

there are ones that exist out there with shorter feet, some even having one short foot, for easier access. but I'm curious-do you have a known stop or zero point you can take a measurement from the depth micrometer? yes, sounds kinda clunky and fiddly. 

does your jewel plate measure in the way I stated above? i'm trying to find out because i think I'm reading it wrong.

I have not received it yet...it is in the mail, so I cannot say much about it until I do.  I am optimistic.

Yes, the jewel plate is as you read it.  I just turned a staff that needed a pivot size of 0.12.  I used both the jewel plate and a micrometer to cross check.  While chucked in the lathe, you have to be careful with the jewel plate (or anything for that matter) because it is easy to cock it slightly and bust the pivot.

My jewel plate was part of my inheritance, but I have looked at them on ebay out of curiosity...yup, pricey.

On dimensions...the JKA tick marks are 0.01 mm (10 thousandths of a mm).  This is, 10 um.  I prefer to think in terms if microns because that was my life in semiconductors for 40 years.  The jewel plate is marked in hundredths of a mm.  Confusing.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
On 3/25/2022 at 8:22 AM, Paul80 said:

Question about these screw-type crystal presses: Can they be used with acrylic crystals in the way that an old Robur style press works by bending the crystal down over a felted lower die and then bringing the case up to meet the compressed crystal? The old Robur dies appear to have been more smoothly concave than these.

I don't mind removing acrylic crystals with a crystal lift, but inserting new ones can be frustrating when the case falls between available crystal diameters and I go for the larger diameter.

(It seems clear these presses will work great on mineral & sapphire crystals)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, mbwatch said:

Question about these screw-type crystal presses: Can they be used with acrylic crystals in the way that an old Robur style press works by bending the crystal down over a felted lower die and then bringing the case up to meet the compressed crystal? The old Robur dies appear to have been more smoothly concave than these.

I don't mind removing acrylic crystals with a crystal lift, but inserting new ones can be frustrating when the case falls between available crystal diameters and I go for the larger diameter.

(It seems clear these presses will work great on mineral & sapphire crystals)

I feel the dies for the screw type presses would not hold a crystal in its compressed state to be able to enter it into a case or bezel. Interesting question though that deserves more thought for adaptation.  👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, mbwatch said:

I wonder if there's a knock off set of dies at the customary one-sixth-bergeon price point to use with the Chinese press in question.

I couldn't find any myself. You can order the Bergeon ones individually from Ofrei, which is what I did and I bought the 06, 07, and 08 sizes for $9 each.

Edited by GuyMontag
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Do these work by pressing the crystal straight into the case or by compression and then release of the crystal ?

It's the same as with the Robur press, it compresses the crystal on the lower domed die then you lift the case up and release the crystal.

EDIT: I'm talking about the Bergeon press I mentioned above, I'm not sure about the Aliexpress ones.

Edited by GuyMontag
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
×
×
  • Create New...