Jump to content

ETA 7751 triple full calendar; service, tips, tricks, watch-out fors, do's and don'ts advice please .....


Recommended Posts

Hello All;

Got myself a nice little project; a triple full calendar 7751 with papers + box from first owner. The gold-plated watch (Berney-Bloneau S.A.) was purchased on 06 Nov. 1995, worn only on social events, never been serviced and never been opened ! (🙂)

A do assume it's a standard grade 7750 (?)

7751-1.thumb.jpg.b742c5d1a6da0251747510ce24df63c5.jpg

(crown pulled out to prevent the watch from running)

7751-2.thumb.jpg.ff90fda7b5718121b532b679cf494060.jpg

On the timegrapher the movement runs with straight lines. Amplitude DD & DU around the 230 degrees and about 190 degrees in the vertical positions.

As far as I'm aware it's mostly a 7750 but before taking it apart, I like to fully understand the calendar works and perhaps its pitfalls; the do's and most importantly the don'ts.

- Any advice were to look-out for when disassembling the calendar works ? Any notorious "jumpers" underneath the calendar plate / disks?

The ETA Technical communication describes how to assemble the calendar driving wheel (position day-finger and month-finger) and some checks & adjustments.

- When assembling the calendar works are there any other points I've to be aware off ...... ??

My plan is to take pictures of the disassembly / assembly for a walk-through ......

Hope to hear 😉

 

 

 

 

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Endeavor changed the title to ETA 7751 triple full calendar; service, tips, tricks, watch-out fors, do's and don'ts advice please .....

There's not too much to fret over if you've done a regular 7750 before. There are two wire click springs on the calendar plate that can jump, and 4 jumpers. Two use springs mounted on the plate, and two the wire springs shared with the moonphase advance lever and corrector. The jumpers for the date and year look identical, and they are, in spite of the manual showing different part numbers, so don't worry about mixing them up.

 

If you've done a 7750 then you are already familiar with the spring for the hour counter hammer and zero lever, that one is always fun to put in place. There is a flat wire spring for the day corrector here, which is easy to overlook or think that it's secured in the plate, but it comes right out. The manual makes it clear how to orient it when reinstalling. The date advance wheel doesn't need to be oriented like the pair of wheels in a regular 7750 day-date, it advances everything in order without any fuss. Pay attention to the minute wheel- it has a little cap on the pinion which needs to go over the hour wheel teeth. This is easy to miss and will lock things up if not installed correctly. Normal 7750 doesn't have this.

 

Otherwise just follow the (very good) manual for lubrication and assembly. They say not to service the barrel but of course you can and should if not replacing it. On a watch this old it might be a good idea to replace it along with the cannon pinion and reverser for the automatic and possibly the rotor bearing. Do the adjustments for the moonphase corrector (again well explained in the manual), the difference between locking up and not working at all is a very small adjustment.

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excellent, such an answer I was hoping for 👍 Thanks a lot !!

Do you have any tips for removing the hammer-spring (45) without scratching the edge of Automatic device bridge (44)?

I know that there is a hole in it, but lifting the spring over the edge of the bridge and releasing the tension doesn't seem to, without making a small scratch, work very well for me. I also tried to carefully remove the bridge, holding the hammer down and then lift the spring ........ bit more tricky of having a "flyer".

What's your way of doing it?

BTW, can you see from the movement whether it's a standard grade?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Endeavor said:

Excellent, such an answer I was hoping for 👍 Thanks a lot !!

Do you have any tips for removing the hammer-spring (45) without scratching the edge of Automatic device bridge (44)?

I know that there is a hole in it, but lifting the spring over the edge of the bridge and releasing the tension doesn't seem to, without making a small scratch, work very well for me. I also tried to carefully remove the bridge, holding the hammer down and then lift the spring ........ bit more tricky of having a "flyer".

What's your way of doing it?

BTW, can you see from the movement whether it's a standard grade?

You can put a piece of Scotch tape on the bridge, the translucent one, not the clear one (it sticks just enough but no residue), to protect from scratching with the hammer spring. I put both spring and hammer before the bridge; it almost always stays put (chrono in "run" mode so the hammer isn't on the chrono wheels). I  can only remember once in the last few years having one that didn't want to do that.

 

Can't tell what grade it is. Even standard grade tends to hit chronometer level rates, or close to it, even after 30 years of being run without servicing. It's not the prettiest chrono but it's a runner.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you, I'll try the "running"-mode tape-method 😉

Yes, it's amazing how accurate you get these 7750's to run when, if all else good, you spend time to adjust the Etachron properly.

I think I know enough to get started 🙂

Thank you for your help so far ...... 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
11 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

Master

Unlike some who like to think they are, you truly are ! 😉 👍

The 7751 is back together, ticking & showing no less than the 11 functions very happily.

Awaiting new crystals to complete the case and for the final walk-through picture ....

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
    • @JohnR725 now that you've mentioned it. This is actually the second aftermarket spring (same place and brand) I ordered as the first one broke. The eye on which the arbor pulls on, broke off on the first spring after the first wind, and also it was a bit to large for the arbor. Looked like on one the second picture in the 2nd group. The second one was exactly the same, I had to bend it a bit, to give it a more prominent curve to the end of the spring so that the arbor catches the eye.  Also I believe both were 5-10mm shorter. Not that I writing that, I feel a bit dumb, as the spring might actually been the problem all along, although its advertised as a substitute to the original...     
    • The CS70 is the only one they show as annealed.  A further search on ebay, I found CS75 and CS100 annealed carbon steel strips  e.g. https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/314072784422
    • Aloha and thanks for catching all these small but important details, John.  I'm going to give it a shot. The good news is I have a parts movement here with a perfect complete balance.  I will place them side by side for visual reference when doing what you outlined.  It's been a while were I've had a hobby in which I joined a forum.  I forgot just how helpful everyone can be. Mahalo. Frank.
×
×
  • Create New...