Jump to content

Bulova Accutron 2180 2181


Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

I somehow doubt that that's the problem as I've never heard of that before. We really need a picture.

I think I'll test my theories in the future before guessing the outcome. I tried a 343, 344 and 350 in a spares movement and the outcome was the same each time - I could get each battery to not start.

I might try and investigate the capacitor(s) next...

IMG_20220102_155312.thumb.jpg.871ebe4088fdfac0200fed1754fcab71.jpgIMG_20220102_155618.thumb.jpg.64cffb0fef6af1b4cb60e08267dc24eb.jpg998050016_ESA9162circuit.thumb.jpg.3a4f8322f1b08335567378c3cd1ea61a.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Plato said:

I could get each battery to not start.

Just a clarification so things are clear in my mind. Just to be clear on things you do know that the watch is not necessarily a self-starter. In other words I'm going to snip something out of the service manual for the 218. Notice the reference that you have to give it a start. So in other words it's not a 100% the watch will start with power it sometimes needs a little help and the manual was written with the thought of using a Mercury battery.

218 not necessarily self starting.JPG

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

Just a clarification so things are clear in my mind. Just to be clear on things you do know that the watch is not necessarily a self-starter. In other words I'm going to snip something out of the service manual for the 218. Notice the reference that you have to give it a start. So in other words it's not a 100% the watch will start with power it sometimes needs a little help and the manual was written with the thought of using a Mercury battery.

218 not necessarily self starting.JPG

So there may be nothing wrong with a tuning fork watch that doesn't start each and every time? Just a quirk of that type of movement? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

Yes exactly there's nothing wrong with the watch.

Thanks @JohnR725. I have two nice Omegas that I didn't feel right to sell on thinking they had a problem. I was happy to keep and wear them knowing full well that a little tap would see them run but not good enough for sale. I'm going to keep one and sell the other to fund more projects 🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...
1 hour ago, LittleWatchShop said:

If you want to build it yourself, here is a solution that I found on the web a while back.

If I remember right the person of posted this design adapted a Bulova variable power supply which is why it's such a peculiar design.

Then if you're looking for another idea of the simple design here's what I use.

lm10 voltage regulator watch repair.JPG

lm10.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there one I could buy that would work?

5 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

If I remember right the person of posted this design adapted a Bulova variable power supply which is why it's such a peculiar design.

Then if you're looking for another idea of the simple design here's what I use.

lm10 voltage regulator watch repair.JPG

lm10.pdf 2.59 MB · 0 downloads

I might be able to build this if I knew what that thing in the middle was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry for late response.  My computer is f upped and wont let me download photos.  Will this meter work and can I build the power supply in it?  Is the power source a 9v battery?  What controls the voltage amount?  I think that I can build it with a little help.

IMG_5167.JPG

IMG_5168.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, markr said:

Will this meter work and can I build the power supply in it?

No, the voltage range is too high.  Your power supply maximum voltage is less than two volts.  Now for me, I would build a supply that goes to about 3.2 volts because it would be more general purpose for quartz watches.  But 10 volts is way too high.

The circuit @JohnR725posted is fine for your application.  I would use a digital meter if your only goal is to provide voltage (not measure current).  I will sketch something up for you and post it a little later.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Use this for your volt meter.

Shown here is a schematic and a layout.  I did not try to make this compact so it is laid out very loose.

Check my work...cranked out pretty fast.

You can download the software used to generate these and order them online.  You get three boards for about $60.  US made and very high quality.

In this layout, the Meter and pot are not intended to be placed on the PCB but shown this way for checking purposes.

The bypass caps are overkill.

If you want to build this, I can PM you the files and a link to the fab.

2022-08-01 16_17_13-ExpressPCB - F__Documents_Docs_Engineering_2016_Projects_LM20 power supply.pcb.png

2022-08-01 16_15_10-ExpressSCH - F__Documents_Docs_Engineering_2016_Projects_LM20 power supply.sch.png

Edited by LittleWatchShop
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

No, the voltage range is too high.  Your power supply maximum voltage is less than two volts.

Yes the problem of normal power supplies are not meant to do watch repair. They will not go typically low enough voltage sometimes a well. They typically go way too high and voltage. Plus they have way too much power out and if you short the leads together you'll have smoke and fire. None of which are nice to have on the watch bench.

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is my power supply.  I use a 9V battery inside the box.  The circuit in this box is different than the one posted above.  The box is a stock box, but the front plate was 3D printed.  I had the 10-turn pot in my box-o-parts, so I used it, but it could be a standard pot.

2022-08-02 07_13_32-20220802_071211.jpg ‎- Photos.png

Here is a tighter layout...just because...

The dots are 0.1 inch spacing.

2022-08-02 07_34_07-ExpressPCB - F__Documents_Docs_Engineering_2016_Projects_LM20 power supply.pcb.png

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LittleWatchShop said:

Here it is...working.  There is a mistake in the pcb layout.  I cannot believe it. What a dip***t mistake.  Who can find it?

 

2022-08-10 15_10_29-20220810_150733.jpg ‎- Photos.png

I don't know if it's a mistake, but I would have reversed the top and bottom layers of the tracks for easier soldering.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/1/2022 at 1:42 PM, markr said:

Sorry for late response.  My computer is f upped and wont let me download photos.  Will this meter work and can I build the power supply in it?  Is the power source a 9v battery?  What controls the voltage amount?  I think that I can build it with a little help.

IMG_5167.JPG

IMG_5168.JPG

If you want to build the LM10 supply, I will send you the PCB.  You can order the LM10 from a variety of places and the digital meter also if you wish to use it.  The 5K pot is also available at Jameco

Edited by LittleWatchShop
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

No, that is not it.  These are plated through holes (vias), so soldering from either side works just fine.  There is a more fundamental error.

So what's the mistake?

The solder pad of R1 looks strange and the alignment of the holes of C1, R1 are not in a straight line. I don't know what the underside looks like but it doesn't seem to follow the PCB plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
×
×
  • Create New...