Jump to content

Weishi vs. Vibrograf conflicting results


Recommended Posts

On 11/11/2021 at 4:07 AM, LittleWatchShop said:

So...how does this thing work?  Well, the motor spins at a precise speed.  The motor drives a roller that his a raised spiral.  When the watch ticks, it causes a hammer to impact the roller.  If the impact hammer hits the roller at the same angular position each time, a vertical line will be marked on the paper.  If the impact hammer hits the roller at a different angular position, the line will walk to the left or to the right. 

From the photo of the tape of a watch running slow, I gather that the motor spins from right to left?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, xyzzy said:

From the photo of the tape of a watch running slow, I gather that the motor spins from right to left?

I'm sure the motor runs in a circle.

 

Sorry, haha. I haven't run my b200 in many years, as I recall looking down at the roller, with the upper part of the spiral to the left, it continues downward towards the right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

I'm sure the motor runs in a circle.

 

Sorry, haha. I haven't run my b200 in many years, as I recall looking down at the roller, with the upper part of the spiral to the left, it continues downward towards the right.

That is correct. It is a raised helix. Very clever design.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, LittleWatchShop said:

is the 5meg board from a B200a?

Absolutely no idea at all?

Went back to the folder where the photograph was found and the only thing I photographed was that office later board and the serial number plate. At least I'm guessing that would be the machine it came from.

B200 sn for new osc.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

Absolutely no idea at all?

Went back to the folder where the photograph was found and the only thing I photographed was that office later board and the serial number plate. At least I'm guessing that would be the machine it came from.

B200 sn for new osc.JPG

The one I have...guessing my Dad bought it in the early 70s. Before that, he had a Watchmaster.

when I get back home, I plan to measure the speed of the motor, and check to see which crystal board I have.

Edited by LittleWatchShop
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/12/2021 at 10:59 AM, nickelsilver said:

Sorry, haha. I haven't run my b200 in many years, as I recall looking down at the roller, with the upper part of the spiral to the left, it continues downward towards the right.

That's the opposite of what I thought.  But, the tape moves "up", I was thinking down, so from the left to the right.  So the line will move to the right as it goes down if the movement is slow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, indeed the motor spins at the following speeds: 32, 40, 44, 48 RPS.  I verified this by measuring the motor pulses with an oscilloscope.

The gear ratio to the platen (the rotating cylinder) is 2.666:1 (the motor turns 2.3333 times for every rotation of the platen).

There are two oscillations of the helix on the platen for every rotation, thus the effective gear ration with respect to the helix is 1.333:1

Taking the ratio of the motor speed to the helix frequency yields 24, 30, 33, 36 which are the values at the top of the beat table on the B200 and designated as "N" in the document posted above. 

These numbers comport with the numbers I posted originally where I assumed that the platen and the helix were 1:1 and the motor to platen also 1:1

And finally, the divider values to achieve the motor frequencies are 330, 264, 240, 220.

There is harmony in the universe.  I can now move on to the next problem...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was probably making a incorrect assumption which was that the vacuum tube version the B100 probably Has the same print mechanism but I don't know if it really does.

What's interesting about the company who makes the timing machine is that the earlier versions they have schematics and repair Manual with all the variations of the schematics and a complete parts list which is not entirely helpful as some of the parts a course or their part numbers and do not correspond to anything in the real world. Like for instance the crystal pickup.

What I was curious about was whether the a use the same quartz frequency they did not. Then because it's vacuum tubes they use a three stage divider and came up the frequencies that I snipped out down below.

 

B100 _motor fr.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, LittleWatchShop said:

I don't understand what this snip means. 

It means I was being lazy and only snipped out one item and didn't give you the other item which I'm now giving you. What the snippet shows you is the final frequency used to drive the motor. Maybe this one is better because it shows you the crystal frequency and what each stage would divide down to to get the final motor frequency.

B100 frequency division for motor drive.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Out of curiosity would you be interested in any other schematics of timing machines? For instance I have the schematic with waveforms for the Bandelin  Tickoprint perfect  T46 Timing machine it looks like it's from the year 1970 at least the schematic the interesting machine with an integrated circuit or two but a complete transistor dividing circuitry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

Out of curiosity would you be interested in any other schematics of timing machines? For instance I have the schematic with waveforms for the Bandelin  Tickoprint perfect  T46 Timing machine it looks like it's from the year 1970 at least the schematic the interesting machine with an integrated circuit or two but a complete transistor dividing circuitry

Would love to!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

Rather than just the schematic yet the entire manual. Complete with it's very interesting interpretation a waveforms at the very back the schematics.

Very nice!  The Tickoprint operates on the same principle as the Vibrograf.

Clever way to get a lot of gain at high frequencies with a single opamp stage.  Back then opamps were expensive...today they are essentially free.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...
13 minutes ago, DavidinSB said:

Hi. It looks like you're simulating the circuit using LTSPice. Did you ever get that simulation to work?  Frequency response curves? I need to determine why the difference in results of my Weishi vs. Vibrograf.

Yes...LTSpice. I can send files if you want to fiddle around...tomorrow.

As I recall, they did work.

I picked up another Vibrograf the other day with microphone. The main unit does not work, but I bought it for the mic

Edited by LittleWatchShop
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It does look like it seems to be working again I'm getting emails.
    • One of the things that I've been bothered with lately is timekeeping? For instance a 90-year-old pocket watch what so to timekeeping was it supposed to keep? They publish railroad timekeeping but I don't know how well normal non-railroad watches were supposed to keep time. The reason why the question comes up for me is I spend a lot of time at work adjusting watches to keep really really good time  because I have to please my boss where as when the watch was made I have to wonder what kind timekeeping would've been acceptable. After all they typically didn't have timing machines 100 years ago and they were timing and six positions certainly not for the non-railroad grade watch. On the other hand I do get paid by the hour so maybe I shouldn't be concerned of how much time I Spend trying to make everything keep chronometer timekeeping almost. Citing a Delta of 40 seconds for a 90-year-old watch is quite outstanding.
    • That's an interesting question which I don't think I've seen explained anywhere. But I think the problem will go away just about instantaneously. In other words the  coating is really thin and it should go away almost immediately. So the problem should resolve itself extremely fast.  
    • I experienced that different types of shellac and their ages are affected differently by IPA. Sometimes the shellac dissolves in a few seconds and sometimes several minutes are required. Nowadays I never let shellac come into contact with IPA. It's a hotly debated topic here on WRT if you search. Like John, I don't think you need to worry about the weight of the shellac, but instead that it might start rubbing against something. When I learned how to adjust pallet stones, I tried documenting my experiences in this thread. Hopefully, it can help you. I personally don't believe in the idea of abrading the epilame before oiling so I don't think you need to think or worry about it. The only time I've heard anyone mention this is Alex on the YouTube channel Watch Repair Tutorials but actually no one else. I'm not saying it's "wrong" just that I don't think it's necessary or adds anything.
    • Typically for introductions all you would have to say is hi I am interested in repairing watches and nobody's going to care about the technical details. Then to certain degree the introductions are not life or death in some cases I guess it depends upon what you did when you came to the discussion group. It's good that you're getting a balance complete for variety of reasons and getting a bonus balance bridge. Because I want you to pay attention to something when you get it as your hairspring still has a problem quite an amusing problem in a way. You notice your hairspring stud is a triangle or shape and it fits into a triangular shaped hole. It also notice how your hairspring has some weird bending right around the stud? So when you get your new balance bridge and the balance complete if you look carefully you'll find that I'm pretty sure the stud will be rotated and that they hairspring will come out the end not the way it's coming here you have managed to twist the stud putting it into the hole and that's why it looks so bad in the previous image. If you are skilled at fixing hairsprings which are not you can fix this. On the other hand are getting replacement so that's good. No it's supposed to be straight up and down. So in addition to twisting the stud you also bent it. On the other hand this is the most common place where people like to bend their hairspring and yes if you had practice with bending hairsprings this is all relatively sort of easy to fix. But I would really suggest practicing on another watch or basically scrap of balance wheels off of eBay that nobody cares about. Because practicing on something you care about really isn't the best. Then the reason I wanted the image below was to see how the balance jewel assembly is attached to the bridge. Sometimes it needed jeweling tool to push it out but in this particular case all you have to do is remove the U-shaped clip in the whole thing falls apart. But if you're lucky here replacement balance bridge will solve the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...