Jump to content

Real or fake?

sweeney90
 Share

Recommended Posts

oldhippy Distinguished Member

oldhippy

Posted
Posted

Well it looks to be genuine, but some of those screw heads look to be poorly finished and not what I would expect. Mind you it looks as if someone has been inside playing with the screws as some have burr on the heads, due to a bad size screwdriver blade or the wrong width used. Are there any numbers on the side of the case? Can we see the face and the hands? The colour of the auto wheels are the correct colour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jdm Distinguished Member

jdm

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, sweeney90 said:

Hello I was wondering if anyone could share any thoughts on this movement. 

Fake of the cheap variety, it's not just the paint peeling off screws, also stamped lettering is off by good deal.
You did not mentioned about the watch and how much you paid it?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
oldhippy Distinguished Member

oldhippy

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, jdm said:

Fake of the cheap variety, it's not just the paint peeling off screws, also stamped lettering is off by good deal.
You did not mentioned about the watch and how much you paid it?

 

 

What do you mean about the stamped lettering? can you give an example jdm? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jdm Distinguished Member

jdm

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, oldhippy said:

What do you mean about the stamped lettering? can you give an example jdm? 

Genuine 1520:

Rolex-Calibro-1520-1.jpg.0fcfe9891441d1948ad51aaa2a51e1bb.jpg

"Rolex" is aligned at the bottom of the rivet at its left, and much closer to it. "26" is centered below it, not to it's right. All stamped lettering has a bronze background. Just open the very many 1520 pictures available online, I'm sure you will fine many other details, probably 

 

 

1 hour ago, sweeney90 said:

My thoughts were that in the 60s most of the work was done by had so there would be room for human error?? 

Not at Rolex (or other top majers) in the 60's, or even in the 30's. That is what set them apart from the competition.
 

Quote

I have not purchased it but have been offered it by somebody at my place of work and he wants £1800 for it 

More pictures? Papers and box? S/N inquiry to Rolex, and certified authentication by an Authorized Dealer? Buying in presence you have the opportunity to obtain all these discriminants which are often unavailable to online buyers. For the peace of mind and workplace, I would not buy without.

Anyway, there are popular luxury watches forums (WUS and others) where authenticity questions are asked all the time. Experts have no problem in answering, sometime bluntly. Post the link here if you do that.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jdm Distinguished Member

jdm

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

I think it's to do with the photos. I still say it's a genuine Rolex. 

To each own his opinion, maybe the OP will ask elsewhere and share.
In the meantime, the casual reader can look and judge himself. Detail of bridge, genuine:

Cattura-1.PNG.c904d81a4cc5cd9e32c478f64b63d77a.PNG

 

it has blued dark screws all of the same color, not some painted and some not. The outer lower said rim is accurately refinished in rounds, the OP's is just milled around with remarkable marks left:

 

Cattura.PNG.f1fbd16e9a220847bd683e4814cce043.PNG

Link to comment
Share on other sites
sweeney90 Member

sweeney90

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 hours ago, jdm said:

To each own his opinion, maybe the OP will ask elsewhere and share.
In the meantime, the casual reader can look and judge himself. Detail of bridge, genuine:

Cattura-1.PNG.c904d81a4cc5cd9e32c478f64b63d77a.PNG

 

it has blued dark screws all of the same color, not some painted and some not. The outer lower said rim is accurately refinished in rounds, the OP's is just milled around with remarkable marks left:

 

Cattura.PNG.f1fbd16e9a220847bd683e4814cce043.PNG

I never noticed this so thank you, I am in the process of getting some other opinions so will post an update once I receive some 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jdm Distinguished Member

jdm

Posted
Posted
12 hours ago, watchfellow said:

 I have never seen a fake 1520 or 1530 before, let alone a cloned vintage movement with that degree of finish. 

That is a good point. Back then  the "highways gas station special" had generic, rudimentary mov.t. I'm not sure when it was that they began faking Rolex mov.s that from far away can fool anyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
HSL Distinguished Member

HSL

Posted
Posted (edited)

I have seen something like this before but didn’t reflect that much of it back then.
If one can assume the bridge is engraved 1520, I would guess the watch should be a Rolex Air-King 5700 not a 5500. It then should have a flat hairspring too, pumping at 19800. The funny thing here is that Rolex would have called the movement 1525 since it has been modified with a date function, but the bridge would still say 1520.
Another thing this specimen appears to have is a main plate from a 1530.
It is always easier to speculate about a watch or a movement if one can see what model of watch this is supposed to be. Would bee scary if this is a fake since some of the parts is quite well done.

Edited by HSL
swinglish
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
anilv Distinguished Member

anilv

Posted
Posted

My vote is that is real.. The shock protection on the balance cock is typical Rolex. Also how the movement screws work... ie the unscrew and brace against the case ring, that's pretty much how Rolex does it. The plain (non free-sprung) balance is consistent with this movement. As to the engraving, my bet is that it looks better with the naked eye.

Good luck

Anilv

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Paul80 WRT Addict

Paul80

Posted
Posted

Bering about as far as you get from knowing a genuine Rolex from a fake I suspect what we are seeing here is just down to the poor quality of the original poster picture compared to the others posted, they are soft and with very little contrast which is making all the fine detail appear to be missing.

Still don't know if it's a fake or not but better quality images taken under better lighting would be a big help here.

Paul

Link to comment
Share on other sites
sweeney90 Member

sweeney90

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Update: So I explained to the seller that I didn’t feel comfortable purchasing the watch without a qualified person looking at the movement and authenticating it. Luckily he understood my apprehensions,  so the watch was taken to a very respectful watchmaker in the East Anglian region who confirmed that it was indeed genuine!! Thanks to everyone who shared their opinion and knowledge 👍

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • nevenbekriev
      Is this a 'hack' ?

      By nevenbekriev · Posted

      OK, welcome in the world of alarm clocks... I guess the 4th wheel is dished because it is from another movement. If it was not dishet, then it would not mesh with the pinion of the escape wheel, am I right? The marks of wear on the 4th wheel pinion doesn't corespond to the 3th wheel table position, at list this is what i see on the picts. Calculating the rate is easy - there is a formula - BR = T2 x T3 x T4 x T5 x 2 /(P3 x P4 x P5) where T2 - T5 are the counts of the teeth of the wheels tables, and P3 - P5 are the counts of the pinion leaves. Vibrating the balance is easy - grasp for the hairspring where it should stay in the regulator with tweasers, let the balance hang on the hairspring while the downside staff tip rests on glass surface. Then make the balance oscillate and use timer to measure the time for let say 50 oscillations, or count the oscillations for let say 30 seconds. You must do the free oscillations test to check the balance staff tips and the cone cup bearings for wear. This kind of staffs wear and need resharpening to restore the normal function of the balance.
    • RichardHarris123
      Any tips to correct a sloppy error?

      By RichardHarris123 · Posted

      Glue a nut to the barrel lid, insert a bolt, pull, disolve the glue.  Maybe someone will have a better answer. 
    • mikepilk
      Setting lever spring

      By mikepilk · Posted

      The stress is the force (on the spring) x distance. The maximum stress is at the bottom, and decreases up the arm. That's why they always break at the bottom. I used a round file, then something like 2000 grit to finish. I gave the rest of the arm a quick polish - no need for a perfect finish. Just make sure there are no 'notches' left from cutting/filing. The notches act like the perforations in your toilet paper 🤣
    • Geotex
      Any tips to correct a sloppy error?

      By Geotex · Posted

      It's probably a cardinal rule for watch repair to never get distracted while at the bench. Yesterday, after finishing a tricky mainspring winding/barrel insertion (I didn't have a winder and arbor that fit very well) I mentally shifted down a gear once that hurdle was passed. There were other things going on in the room as I put the barrel and cover into the barrel closer and pressed to get that satisfying snap. But when I took it out I realized I never placed the arbor.  When opening a barrel, we are relying on the arbor to transfer a concentrically-distributed force right where it is needed at the internal center of the lid. However, when that isn't present it's difficult to apply pressure or get leverage considering the recessed position of the lid, the small holes in the barrel and the presence of the mainspring coils. It was a beat-up practice movement so I didn't take a lot of time to think it over and I pushed it out using a short right-angle dental probe placed in from the bottom, but that did leave a bit of a scratch and crease in the thin lid. I had also thought about pulling it using a course-threaded screw with a minor thread diameter smaller than the lid hole and a major diameter larger, but that may have done some damage as well.  Thinking about how this might have been handled had it been a more valuable movement, is there a method using watchmaking or other tools that should extract the lid with the least damage? 
    • Neverenoughwatches
      Epilame / Fixodrop

      By Neverenoughwatches · Posted

      🤔 what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ? Making a small groove so the lubrication doesn't spread across the component but what if when lubing a little overspills and sits on the epilame .
×
×
  • Create New...