Jump to content

Old mainspring without an inner loop

ifibrin

By ifibrin
in Watch Repairs Help & Advice

 Share

Recommended Posts

jdm Distinguished Member

jdm

Posted
Posted

Surely not, who had worked on the watch must have discarded the broken piece when the repair was not made.

A broken mainspring is easy to diagnose from the outside because the watch winds effortlessly and forever. You would then start work as a repair, not just servicing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ifibrin Super WRT Addict

ifibrin

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, jdm said:

Surely not, who had worked on the watch must have discarded the broken piece when the repair was not made.

A broken mainspring is easy to diagnose from the outside because the watch winds effortlessly and forever. You would then start work as a repair, not just servicing. 

There is still a hole in the mainspring to engage the hook on the arbor, just that there is no loop!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jdm Distinguished Member

jdm

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, ifibrin said:

There is still a hole in the mainspring to engage the hook on the arbor, just that there is no loop!

The mainspring broke at the point of maximum stress, typically where curving is tighter. If you inspect the edge you could be able to see signs of fracture instead of a manufacturing cut. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
watchweasol Distinguished Member

watchweasol

Posted
Posted

I think we can concur what happened is what jdm has said the spring broke at the most stressed point, a previous repairer has removed the spring and re punched the hole but not bothered to reform the coil as it would require the  spring to be annealed and reformed, a cheap repair that would work untill the spring slipped the arbour and would not re engage. a new mainspring is required to complete the job.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jdm Distinguished Member

jdm

Posted
Posted
29 minutes ago, watchweasol said:

 a previous repairer has removed the spring and re punched the hole but not bothered to reform the coil as it would require the  spring to be annealed and reformed, a cheap repair that would work untill the spring slipped the arbour and would not re engage.

I see what you mean. As soon the mainspring is coiled a little it keeps the hook in the hole. Maybe the recommendation at delivery was not to ever let the watch unwind completely 😏

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jon
      Introducing myself

      By Jon · Posted

      Hi there  
    • Jon
      Movement inserted from crytal side

      By Jon · Posted

      Put the movement in a movement holder and it will be supported as you push down on the setting lever post to release the winding stem. Make sure the post is over the shoulder of the movement holder so what you are pressing down on is supported. As a general rule, hold the movement and not the movement holder. Replace the hands when the movement isn't in the case and support the centre jewel (if it has one) on a hard surface or staking block when replacing the hands to stop the jewel accidentally moving or even coming out. A dedicated movement holder with a central jewel support is even better, but pricey
    • JohnR725
      Main spring

      By JohnR725 · Posted

      It might help us if we knew which watch like model number.
    • Zedster
      Movement inserted from crytal side

      By Zedster · Posted

      Hi, guys I have a bit of a predicament and hopefully, somebody can advise. I'm working on a Roamer MST 521 where the movement is extracted from the crystal side. I'm now at the final hurdle where I need to replace the movement back into its case but I'm not sure of the correct procedure. I still need to fit the hands but that's where the problem lies. If I insert the winding stem to test the hands for correct alignment I will need to turn the movement over to release the stem again it's the spring-loaded type and needs a small bit of force to push down but with the hands fitted, I don't think I can do this on a cushion without causing some damage to the hands and that's the last thing I want to do, this watch has already been a love-hate relationship and I'm so close to boxing this one off which I'm counting as my first major project.  The other option is to case the movement then fit the hands and hope everything is okay. I've already broken the original winding stem but managed to find a replacement, the last one in stock, so I'm a bit reluctant to keep removing it. Any suggestions would be appreciated. 
    • Jon
      Main spring

      By Jon · Posted

      I would go for the dearer spring. You won't need to remove the spring from the carrier ring and then use a mainspring winder to get it into the barrel, for a start. Also that spring is closer to the needed dimensions, especially the length. The length plays a part in the mainsprings strength. If you double the length you will half the force (strength) of the spring and vice-versa. A spring with 20 mm less length would be about 7% shorter, so technically would be 7% more strength, but I find halving this number is closer to real-world findings, so the spring would be about 3 to 4% more strength/force. On a mainspring that ideally kicks out 300 degrees of amplitude, a 3% increase in amplitude would be 309 degrees. Increasing or decreasing the length of the mainspring will affect the power reserve to a greater or lesser degree. It depends how much shorter or longer it is. I've attached a lesson regarding mainsprings, focussing on the size and strength of the spring within the barrel, you might find helpful. Unfortunately it is a PDF converted from a PowerPoint presentation, but only a slide was lost that was originally a video of fitting a mainspring   Lesson 5 The mainspring.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...