Jump to content

What is the difference between the hand setting "pen"-style tools vs the larger bench-style tools?


GregG

Recommended Posts

Sometimes when installing hands, I don't feel confident with the loose approach to using the pen-style pressers, since you have to trust that your hand is steady, and slipping could be potentially dangerous to the movement.  I'm looking into the more bench-style tools for stability and its ability to press downwards exactly at 90 degrees, but can't find a resource that describes the difference between the two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I was in school last century we pressed hands on with tweezers, preferably nickel or brass. Then towards the end of school a specialist came to teach us chronographs and the first thing we did was make our own nylon pushers from rod- that was a revelation and I've used those or commercial "free hand" plastic tipped pushers since. But I do see the advantage of the devices that keep things nice and vertical and even approaching "codger" status I think I'll buy one just to add to the arsenal. At a hobby level I think you could put your money toward more useful tools though.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Just to add my two cents, I find the vertical tool usually gives a better result especially if the hands are not damaged. In addition to this the tool also forces you to slow down and set up the tool and position of the watch correctly. After a long challenging build and I see the finish line in sight I sometimes rush the final stages and end up taking several steps back (bending a hand, scratching the dial, slipping and dropping the entire movement on the floor)....setting up the hand press tool with the correct nib forces you to take your time. However, if the hands are not perfect sometimes you may need to apply a very small force at something other than perpendicular in order to lift or drop the hand very slightly (fractions of a mm) to avoid it clashing with the hand above or below or the dial chapters etc., and this is best done with the hand pen type tools as you get more of a feel of what is going on. Therefore, I usually force myself to use the desk type tool and then make fine adjustments with the hand tools if required, but as @nickelsilverpoints out you could manage with either tool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like to install hands under a microscope. I find that the plastic tipped pens block the view and I can't see anything through the microscope. My spring loaded presser is collecting dust in the drawer.

So, I discovered that there is an Indian made tool from Anchor, that is basically a metal rod with a hole at each end. The watch hand hole is visible through the hole of the presser. But most of the time, I just press it on with a plastic tipped tweezer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Through trial and error I find that I get the best results by aiming my camera at the dial and viewing on my monitor. One time I was able to see why two hands were hitting one another and it wasn't because the hands were not set properly but because of corrosion on the underside of the minute hand which was scraping along the hour hand.

 

hand-press.jpg.7dcf444deb67d157fc1ba40f2953fc5a.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OK, welcome in the world of alarm clocks... I guess the 4th wheel is dished because it is from another movement. If it was not dishet, then it would not mesh with the pinion of the escape wheel, am I right? The marks of wear on the 4th wheel pinion doesn't corespond to the 3th wheel table position, at list this is what i see on the picts. Calculating the rate is easy - there is a formula - BR = T2 x T3 x T4 x T5 x 2 /(P3 x P4 x P5) where T2 - T5 are the counts of the teeth of the wheels tables, and P3 - P5 are the counts of the pinion leaves. Vibrating the balance is easy - grasp for the hairspring where it should stay in the regulator with tweasers, let the balance hang on the hairspring while the downside staff tip rests on glass surface. Then make the balance oscillate and use timer to measure the time for let say 50 oscillations, or count the oscillations for let say 30 seconds. You must do the free oscillations test to check the balance staff tips and the cone cup bearings for wear. This kind of staffs wear and need resharpening to restore the normal function of the balance.
    • Glue a nut to the barrel lid, insert a bolt, pull, disolve the glue.  Maybe someone will have a better answer. 
    • The stress is the force (on the spring) x distance. The maximum stress is at the bottom, and decreases up the arm. That's why they always break at the bottom. I used a round file, then something like 2000 grit to finish. I gave the rest of the arm a quick polish - no need for a perfect finish. Just make sure there are no 'notches' left from cutting/filing. The notches act like the perforations in your toilet paper 🤣
    • It's probably a cardinal rule for watch repair to never get distracted while at the bench. Yesterday, after finishing a tricky mainspring winding/barrel insertion (I didn't have a winder and arbor that fit very well) I mentally shifted down a gear once that hurdle was passed. There were other things going on in the room as I put the barrel and cover into the barrel closer and pressed to get that satisfying snap. But when I took it out I realized I never placed the arbor.  When opening a barrel, we are relying on the arbor to transfer a concentrically-distributed force right where it is needed at the internal center of the lid. However, when that isn't present it's difficult to apply pressure or get leverage considering the recessed position of the lid, the small holes in the barrel and the presence of the mainspring coils. It was a beat-up practice movement so I didn't take a lot of time to think it over and I pushed it out using a short right-angle dental probe placed in from the bottom, but that did leave a bit of a scratch and crease in the thin lid. I had also thought about pulling it using a course-threaded screw with a minor thread diameter smaller than the lid hole and a major diameter larger, but that may have done some damage as well.  Thinking about how this might have been handled had it been a more valuable movement, is there a method using watchmaking or other tools that should extract the lid with the least damage? 
    • 🤔 what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ? Making a small groove so the lubrication doesn't spread across the component but what if when lubing a little overspills and sits on the epilame .
×
×
  • Create New...