Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have used one very similar for a while now. OK for basic diagnostics and helps to eliminate the obvious (battery, free train, coil etc).  Instructions for use were not very good but it is simple enough to use.  There are better and more expensive ones for the professionals, but this type is ok for the rest of us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi all, I am a new member and was looking for some advise. I have a fully kitted out workshop at work with the best equipment up to accreditation level from most brands but am looking to build a small workbench at home on a budget. The next thing on my list is a machine that will test the consumption of a Quartz movement. I have the all singing all dancing witchi one at work but was looking for a cheaper more basic alternative for at home. The cheapest I have found is the horotec Flashtest, has anyone any experience with this tester or is there a cheaper alternative. I only need to test the the consumption of the movement on 1.5v Watch's, I don't need it to do anything else.

Your help and advise would be greatly appreciated 

 

thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you only need to test consumption (drain) all you have to is to get a broken quartz movement, remove all components, solder two wires to it to + and - pads, terminate these with a crocodile clip. you can now put a battery in it and measure with any common tester.

Otherwise there are cheap testers like this

http://www.aliexpress.com/item/Free-Shipping-2013-Latest-Quartz-Watch-Impulse-Button-Battery-Checker-Battery-Tester-Watch-Tools/1581946931.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply, the tester you have linked to is not quite what I am wanting. I want to be able to remove the battery from say a tag Watch with a eta 955 112 movement and then put a prong on the + and a prong on the - which will then give a reading in μA. For example this eta calibre should read below 1.5μA for a new battery to last 2 years, if the reading is higher than this it means the watch needs a service because it's consuming too much from the battery and the battery won't last the 2 year period it should. The tests can be quite a low reading for some calibres so would think the devise used will have to have a digital display to be accurate. Some ladies Watch's should be .5 and the Rolex oyster Quartz can be as high as around 9μA going from memory so it needs to be quite accurate.

 

This is the cheapest version I have found so far that will do it. The test I want to do is test 6 in the instructions in the link below.

http://www.horotec.ch/flashtest/ModeEmploiANGLAIS.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are correct, I didn't realized that the device above doesn't do what you require. I could not find a cheap dedicated instrument so all you have to do is to use an external battery and a good multimeter. This one has a 20 uA setting which should work

http://www.aliexpress.com/item/High-Accuracy-General-Manual-Range-Digital-Multimeters-UNI-T-UT39A-Amp-Ohm-Volt-Meter-Digital-LCD/1000001391486.html

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Without knowing the exact name and type of the component, it's simply an electro-magnetic sensor. However in my opinion is that the watch runs it's pointless to see that it pulses - evidently it does. What you may want to know is the timing and shape of the pulse, for which you need a much, more sophisticated machine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jdm said:

Without knowing the exact name and type of the component, it's simply an electro-magnetic sensor. However in my opinion is that the watch runs it's pointless to see that it pulses - evidently it does. What you may want to know is the timing and shape of the pulse, for which you need a much, more sophisticated machine.

There is a benefit to such a detector as it is a quick way to determine whether a non-running watch is suffering an electrical/electronic fault or a mechanical blockage since a mechanically seized movement will still pulse without the hands moving.

A simple diagnostic routine for a non-running quartz watch might be;

Pulse detected - mechanics need freeing/servicing

No pulse - check continuity of coil

If coil is open circuit then replace coil

If coil is good but there is still no pulse then electronic module is faulty

 

At this level of simplicity a tester can be picked up off eBay for as little as £15 or so and could save a lot of time if you do a lot of quartz movements. Something more sophisticated would certainly be of benefit if you going to get into repairing the electronic modules but then the cost does go up considerably.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

I was reading up about this tester and nobody has passed any coments about the `Horotec Flashtest` tester, that is why I have mentioned it; specifically. Maybe someone who hasn`t seen my prevoius article will see this one.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Ray said:

I have one and used it for the BHI Quartz servicing exam. A great little device that does almost everything you need at the fraction of the price of a Witschi 

Can't compare this to Witschi, which has a full screen oscilloscope showing the shape of the pulse (important on the latest generation, low drawn movt.s), memory, and heaven known how many things more. A top laboratory would get that, an hobbyist or a budget professional the $30 boxes mentioned in the thread above.

Edited by jdm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think unless you're working on quartz a lot, it's hard to justify the cost. Please don't do this with your Omega's but if you have a cheap quartz movement and suspect the train is stuck. You can use a cheap Chinese demagetiser $15. Place the movement and press the button. The hands will spin and the second hand is likely to spin off into orbit. See pics. No damage was done to the movement and it still keeps time. And no the rotor was not demagetised. No I'm not accepting liability for this BAD practice. Note how fast the second hand is rotating! [emoji16]cdb4598a1d563882110b7f4e23a68d8a.jpgd12c81a6376d778882a6564b88c44fc2.jpg86de6d3e819b454d370939304e3e8db7.jpg

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, jdm said:

Can't compare this to Witschi, which has a full screen oscilloscope showing the shape of the pulse (important on the latest generation, low drawn movt.s), memory, and heaven known how many things more. A top laboratory would get that, an hobbyist or a budget professional the $30 boxes mentioned in the thread above.

The Witschi is a serious machine with a serious price which is not suitable or justifiable for the hobbyist, the horotec tests voltage consumption, lowest working voltage, coil resistance, battery voltage under load and end of life indicator and the rate. Which is all I'll ever need. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ray said:

the horotec tests voltage consumption, lowest working voltage, coil resistance, battery voltage under load and end of life indicator and the rate. Which is all I'll ever need. 

(Test battery consumption). My point is that you can have all that for maybe $80, not $439. But to each one his own.

Edited by jdm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • An update, for everyone who contributed advice, and for those who come after with a similar problem. Based on the answers received, I decided to work on the face of the hammer first. I used a square degussit stone to guarantee a vertical surface to work against, and ground the face back until it was square across 90% of the depth. I was conscious of the risk of removing too much material.* After I'd got the shape how I wanted it, I polished the surface with lapping film. To cut a long story short, it did the trick and the hammer hasn't slipped off the cam since. Of course, that wasn't the end of my problems. Have a look at this video and tell me what you think is wrong. https://youtu.be/sgAUMIPaw98 The first four attempts show (0 to 34 sec.) the chrono seconds hand jumping forwards, the next two attempts (35 to 47 sec.) seem "normal", then on the seventh attempt (48 to 54 sec.) the seconds hand jumps to 5 sec. and the minute counter jumps to 1. The rest of the video just shows repeats of these three variants. I solved it by rotating the minute counter finger on the chronograph (seconds) runner relative to the cam.  I'd be interested to hear your opinions on that. It seemed to be the right thing to do, but maybe I've introduced another problem I'm not aware of. * What is the correct relationship between the two hammers and cams, by the way? Should both hammers strike the cams exactly at the same time, or is it correct for the minute counter hammer to be a bit behind the seconds hammer? In this picture, I removed the adjusting screw at 1, and the hammers are contacting the cams simultaneously at 3 and 4. I had to turn the screw down tight to achieve this condition after stoning the seconds hammer and replacing the bridge.
    • It was easy enough to pop off. Once I had the cannon pinion hanging on the blades of the stump, I got my #2 tweezers on the gear attached to the staff and levered it down. That way none of the force was on the brass wheel itself.   I reinstalled it and the bridge, and it looks like a small but reasonable amount of end shake. It also spins easily with a blower. It stops quickly, but I think that's due to the large shoulder and about what I'd expect from this wheel.  
    • Oh, right. For some reason I was picturing a monocoque case in my head. Good looking watch!
    • Well said Ross. My reason for the thread, i like many of us dont want to lose the forum, such a well knitted group of individuals i feel. But things can happen out of anyone's control. Would be nice to have something in place just in case, if anyone has any ideas please speak up. 
    • Ok thanks Ross, I will give that a try!😁
×
×
  • Create New...