Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have used one very similar for a while now. OK for basic diagnostics and helps to eliminate the obvious (battery, free train, coil etc).  Instructions for use were not very good but it is simple enough to use.  There are better and more expensive ones for the professionals, but this type is ok for the rest of us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi all, I am a new member and was looking for some advise. I have a fully kitted out workshop at work with the best equipment up to accreditation level from most brands but am looking to build a small workbench at home on a budget. The next thing on my list is a machine that will test the consumption of a Quartz movement. I have the all singing all dancing witchi one at work but was looking for a cheaper more basic alternative for at home. The cheapest I have found is the horotec Flashtest, has anyone any experience with this tester or is there a cheaper alternative. I only need to test the the consumption of the movement on 1.5v Watch's, I don't need it to do anything else.

Your help and advise would be greatly appreciated 

 

thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you only need to test consumption (drain) all you have to is to get a broken quartz movement, remove all components, solder two wires to it to + and - pads, terminate these with a crocodile clip. you can now put a battery in it and measure with any common tester.

Otherwise there are cheap testers like this

http://www.aliexpress.com/item/Free-Shipping-2013-Latest-Quartz-Watch-Impulse-Button-Battery-Checker-Battery-Tester-Watch-Tools/1581946931.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply, the tester you have linked to is not quite what I am wanting. I want to be able to remove the battery from say a tag Watch with a eta 955 112 movement and then put a prong on the + and a prong on the - which will then give a reading in μA. For example this eta calibre should read below 1.5μA for a new battery to last 2 years, if the reading is higher than this it means the watch needs a service because it's consuming too much from the battery and the battery won't last the 2 year period it should. The tests can be quite a low reading for some calibres so would think the devise used will have to have a digital display to be accurate. Some ladies Watch's should be .5 and the Rolex oyster Quartz can be as high as around 9μA going from memory so it needs to be quite accurate.

 

This is the cheapest version I have found so far that will do it. The test I want to do is test 6 in the instructions in the link below.

http://www.horotec.ch/flashtest/ModeEmploiANGLAIS.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are correct, I didn't realized that the device above doesn't do what you require. I could not find a cheap dedicated instrument so all you have to do is to use an external battery and a good multimeter. This one has a 20 uA setting which should work

http://www.aliexpress.com/item/High-Accuracy-General-Manual-Range-Digital-Multimeters-UNI-T-UT39A-Amp-Ohm-Volt-Meter-Digital-LCD/1000001391486.html

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Without knowing the exact name and type of the component, it's simply an electro-magnetic sensor. However in my opinion is that the watch runs it's pointless to see that it pulses - evidently it does. What you may want to know is the timing and shape of the pulse, for which you need a much, more sophisticated machine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jdm said:

Without knowing the exact name and type of the component, it's simply an electro-magnetic sensor. However in my opinion is that the watch runs it's pointless to see that it pulses - evidently it does. What you may want to know is the timing and shape of the pulse, for which you need a much, more sophisticated machine.

There is a benefit to such a detector as it is a quick way to determine whether a non-running watch is suffering an electrical/electronic fault or a mechanical blockage since a mechanically seized movement will still pulse without the hands moving.

A simple diagnostic routine for a non-running quartz watch might be;

Pulse detected - mechanics need freeing/servicing

No pulse - check continuity of coil

If coil is open circuit then replace coil

If coil is good but there is still no pulse then electronic module is faulty

 

At this level of simplicity a tester can be picked up off eBay for as little as £15 or so and could save a lot of time if you do a lot of quartz movements. Something more sophisticated would certainly be of benefit if you going to get into repairing the electronic modules but then the cost does go up considerably.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

I was reading up about this tester and nobody has passed any coments about the `Horotec Flashtest` tester, that is why I have mentioned it; specifically. Maybe someone who hasn`t seen my prevoius article will see this one.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Ray said:

I have one and used it for the BHI Quartz servicing exam. A great little device that does almost everything you need at the fraction of the price of a Witschi 

Can't compare this to Witschi, which has a full screen oscilloscope showing the shape of the pulse (important on the latest generation, low drawn movt.s), memory, and heaven known how many things more. A top laboratory would get that, an hobbyist or a budget professional the $30 boxes mentioned in the thread above.

Edited by jdm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think unless you're working on quartz a lot, it's hard to justify the cost. Please don't do this with your Omega's but if you have a cheap quartz movement and suspect the train is stuck. You can use a cheap Chinese demagetiser $15. Place the movement and press the button. The hands will spin and the second hand is likely to spin off into orbit. See pics. No damage was done to the movement and it still keeps time. And no the rotor was not demagetised. No I'm not accepting liability for this BAD practice. Note how fast the second hand is rotating! [emoji16]cdb4598a1d563882110b7f4e23a68d8a.jpgd12c81a6376d778882a6564b88c44fc2.jpg86de6d3e819b454d370939304e3e8db7.jpg

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, jdm said:

Can't compare this to Witschi, which has a full screen oscilloscope showing the shape of the pulse (important on the latest generation, low drawn movt.s), memory, and heaven known how many things more. A top laboratory would get that, an hobbyist or a budget professional the $30 boxes mentioned in the thread above.

The Witschi is a serious machine with a serious price which is not suitable or justifiable for the hobbyist, the horotec tests voltage consumption, lowest working voltage, coil resistance, battery voltage under load and end of life indicator and the rate. Which is all I'll ever need. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ray said:

the horotec tests voltage consumption, lowest working voltage, coil resistance, battery voltage under load and end of life indicator and the rate. Which is all I'll ever need. 

(Test battery consumption). My point is that you can have all that for maybe $80, not $439. But to each one his own.

Edited by jdm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In the meantime whilst awaiting a better plan, please drop me a quick hello on my email. 
    • I looked at it like this, I've built a lot of stuff in my time, building structures and furniture,those are my creations and they will still be here way way after I'm gone. Traditional watchmakers felt the need to pass their knowledge on, ideas that they created . I assume with them as it is with me, leaving their mark on the earth, a way of being remembered. This creation of Mark's has brought thousands of people together to pass their knowledge around,  ideas that will continue to be used for lifetimes. Ideas that should continue to be procured. If for whatever reason the forum ceased to exist, not quite like Ranfft's, that didn't disappear but much less usable. Then that is sad, such a massive loss of communication between good people and a wealth of knowledge lost. There should be something in place for when that happens which could be next week, next year or in 10 years. Might not be a topical subject for a lot of folk or boardering on controversy, i did say i talk about stuff other people dont. But if you dont talk about it and something happens then you've lost it and you ain't gonna fix it .
    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
×
×
  • Create New...