Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have used one very similar for a while now. OK for basic diagnostics and helps to eliminate the obvious (battery, free train, coil etc).  Instructions for use were not very good but it is simple enough to use.  There are better and more expensive ones for the professionals, but this type is ok for the rest of us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi all, I am a new member and was looking for some advise. I have a fully kitted out workshop at work with the best equipment up to accreditation level from most brands but am looking to build a small workbench at home on a budget. The next thing on my list is a machine that will test the consumption of a Quartz movement. I have the all singing all dancing witchi one at work but was looking for a cheaper more basic alternative for at home. The cheapest I have found is the horotec Flashtest, has anyone any experience with this tester or is there a cheaper alternative. I only need to test the the consumption of the movement on 1.5v Watch's, I don't need it to do anything else.

Your help and advise would be greatly appreciated 

 

thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you only need to test consumption (drain) all you have to is to get a broken quartz movement, remove all components, solder two wires to it to + and - pads, terminate these with a crocodile clip. you can now put a battery in it and measure with any common tester.

Otherwise there are cheap testers like this

http://www.aliexpress.com/item/Free-Shipping-2013-Latest-Quartz-Watch-Impulse-Button-Battery-Checker-Battery-Tester-Watch-Tools/1581946931.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply, the tester you have linked to is not quite what I am wanting. I want to be able to remove the battery from say a tag Watch with a eta 955 112 movement and then put a prong on the + and a prong on the - which will then give a reading in μA. For example this eta calibre should read below 1.5μA for a new battery to last 2 years, if the reading is higher than this it means the watch needs a service because it's consuming too much from the battery and the battery won't last the 2 year period it should. The tests can be quite a low reading for some calibres so would think the devise used will have to have a digital display to be accurate. Some ladies Watch's should be .5 and the Rolex oyster Quartz can be as high as around 9μA going from memory so it needs to be quite accurate.

 

This is the cheapest version I have found so far that will do it. The test I want to do is test 6 in the instructions in the link below.

http://www.horotec.ch/flashtest/ModeEmploiANGLAIS.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are correct, I didn't realized that the device above doesn't do what you require. I could not find a cheap dedicated instrument so all you have to do is to use an external battery and a good multimeter. This one has a 20 uA setting which should work

http://www.aliexpress.com/item/High-Accuracy-General-Manual-Range-Digital-Multimeters-UNI-T-UT39A-Amp-Ohm-Volt-Meter-Digital-LCD/1000001391486.html

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Without knowing the exact name and type of the component, it's simply an electro-magnetic sensor. However in my opinion is that the watch runs it's pointless to see that it pulses - evidently it does. What you may want to know is the timing and shape of the pulse, for which you need a much, more sophisticated machine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jdm said:

Without knowing the exact name and type of the component, it's simply an electro-magnetic sensor. However in my opinion is that the watch runs it's pointless to see that it pulses - evidently it does. What you may want to know is the timing and shape of the pulse, for which you need a much, more sophisticated machine.

There is a benefit to such a detector as it is a quick way to determine whether a non-running watch is suffering an electrical/electronic fault or a mechanical blockage since a mechanically seized movement will still pulse without the hands moving.

A simple diagnostic routine for a non-running quartz watch might be;

Pulse detected - mechanics need freeing/servicing

No pulse - check continuity of coil

If coil is open circuit then replace coil

If coil is good but there is still no pulse then electronic module is faulty

 

At this level of simplicity a tester can be picked up off eBay for as little as £15 or so and could save a lot of time if you do a lot of quartz movements. Something more sophisticated would certainly be of benefit if you going to get into repairing the electronic modules but then the cost does go up considerably.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

I was reading up about this tester and nobody has passed any coments about the `Horotec Flashtest` tester, that is why I have mentioned it; specifically. Maybe someone who hasn`t seen my prevoius article will see this one.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Ray said:

I have one and used it for the BHI Quartz servicing exam. A great little device that does almost everything you need at the fraction of the price of a Witschi 

Can't compare this to Witschi, which has a full screen oscilloscope showing the shape of the pulse (important on the latest generation, low drawn movt.s), memory, and heaven known how many things more. A top laboratory would get that, an hobbyist or a budget professional the $30 boxes mentioned in the thread above.

Edited by jdm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think unless you're working on quartz a lot, it's hard to justify the cost. Please don't do this with your Omega's but if you have a cheap quartz movement and suspect the train is stuck. You can use a cheap Chinese demagetiser $15. Place the movement and press the button. The hands will spin and the second hand is likely to spin off into orbit. See pics. No damage was done to the movement and it still keeps time. And no the rotor was not demagetised. No I'm not accepting liability for this BAD practice. Note how fast the second hand is rotating! [emoji16]cdb4598a1d563882110b7f4e23a68d8a.jpgd12c81a6376d778882a6564b88c44fc2.jpg86de6d3e819b454d370939304e3e8db7.jpg

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, jdm said:

Can't compare this to Witschi, which has a full screen oscilloscope showing the shape of the pulse (important on the latest generation, low drawn movt.s), memory, and heaven known how many things more. A top laboratory would get that, an hobbyist or a budget professional the $30 boxes mentioned in the thread above.

The Witschi is a serious machine with a serious price which is not suitable or justifiable for the hobbyist, the horotec tests voltage consumption, lowest working voltage, coil resistance, battery voltage under load and end of life indicator and the rate. Which is all I'll ever need. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ray said:

the horotec tests voltage consumption, lowest working voltage, coil resistance, battery voltage under load and end of life indicator and the rate. Which is all I'll ever need. 

(Test battery consumption). My point is that you can have all that for maybe $80, not $439. But to each one his own.

Edited by jdm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
×
×
  • Create New...