Jump to content

Eternamatic movement removal?


Recommended Posts

I have this Eternamatic that I am trying to identify and hopefully clean without damaging it or the Dial. The movement comes out with the case back, and I am assuming that the crown must be removed to access the movement?20210509_143451.thumb.jpg.4a41e0ed6e035c42e301f44029900ecc.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could be a two part stem. Some just pull apart, some will come apart if the stem is rotated just right.

My first course will be to try to lever the movement out by prying (gently!!!) under the dial on the crown side while simultaneously rotating the crown.

If that doesnt work then try pulling out the crown. However I would wait a few days to see if any others has had experience with this watch/case before trying.

rgds

Anilv

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, anilv said:

Could be a two part stem. Some just pull apart, some will come apart if the stem is rotated just right.

My first course will be to try to lever the movement out by prying (gently!!!) under the dial on the crown side while simultaneously rotating the crown.

If that doesnt work then try pulling out the crown. However I would wait a few days to see if any others has had experience with this watch/case before trying.

rgds

Anilv

Thanks Anilv, I am not in a hurry but that gives me a couple of options to try, I don't want to damage the dial. After I figure out how to get it apart I will need some pointers on cleaning the dial. It seems that the glue from the gasket has gummed up the edges of the dial. Thanks again for the advice. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noticed at 3 and 9, on the sub bezel? there are recesses, which seem to be intended for placing a screwdriver to compress the lens, (if the lens is acyrlic ) and perhaps once the lens is out, the movement and dial exit out the front. If the lens is glass, perhaps those recesses are to lever the bezel/sub-bezel? off.  I remember another watch I worked on, where the movement, dial, stem and all exited out the front, only after the crystal was removed. a Vacheron & Constantin-LeCoultre Galaxy, with a mystery dial if I remember correctly.

Or, as mentioned by someone else, it may be a split stem, or possibly a split stem, and out the front as well. Like the Omega Seamaster Cosmic. Really hard to say without a side view pic.

I believe in any case, that at some point, those recesses at 3 and 9 will be useful in some way. All conjecture on my part, no guarantees, only possibilities.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, OneBadWolf said:

I noticed at 3 and 9, on the sub bezel? there are recesses, which seem to be intended for placing a screwdriver to compress the lens, (if the lens is acyrlic ) and perhaps once the lens is out

Seems to me that the crystal is out already, as suggested above turn the crown slowly to align the stem joint while lifting up gently. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, OneBadWolf said:

I noticed at 3 and 9, on the sub bezel? there are recesses, which seem to be intended for placing a screwdriver to compress the lens, (if the lens is acyrlic ) and perhaps once the lens is out, the movement and dial exit out the front. If the lens is glass, perhaps those recesses are to lever the bezel/sub-bezel? off.  I remember another watch I worked on, where the movement, dial, stem and all exited out the front, only after the crystal was removed. a Vacheron & Constantin-LeCoultre Galaxy, with a mystery dial if I remember correctly.

Or, as mentioned by someone else, it may be a split stem, or possibly a split stem, and out the front as well. Like the Omega Seamaster Cosmic. Really hard to say without a side view pic.

I believe in any case, that at some point, those recesses at 3 and 9 will be useful in some way. All conjecture on my part, no guarantees, only possibilities.

 

Thanks, the top half of the case has set screws that allow you to remove it along with the crystal, now as you see it the dial is exposed and I need to pull the crown and stem to remove the movement. I will try and rotate the crown while prying gently and see if that works. I appreciate your help 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/10/2021 at 4:22 PM, OneBadWolf said:

I noticed at 3 and 9, on the sub bezel? there are recesses, .......... that at some point, those recesses at 3 and 9 will be useful in some way.

 

Hi wolf,

My guess is that these recesses are the edges of a round movement peeking past the dial.

Anilv

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh nice. I have a similar wedge style stump for my staking tool, so I'll give that a shot. Thanks!
    • Thank you all for the replies!  Very informative! True enough, the Gamsol took some time to evaporate and does leave a residue. So not all naphtha are created equal!  Need to find alternatives then. i was able to try Hexane recommended by Alex and it seems great.  I wonder what the cons are?
    • Yeah, I saw that in the tech sheet but I don't see how it can be adequately cleaned with the friction pinion still in place. I've accidentally pulled the arbor right out of the wheel once when I used a presto tool to try and remove it. Mark shows how he does it with the Platax tool. Those are a little too pricey for me so I got one of these from Aliexpress and I just push down on the arbor with the end of my brass tweezers. That usually gets it most of the way out and then I just grab the wheel with one hand the and the friction pinion with the other and gently rotate them until it pops off. Probably not the best way but it's seemed to work for me so far.    
    • Thanks, Jon Sounds like a plan. Obviously I'll have the face on so do you think gripping with the holder will create any problems, but I will check in the morning to see how feasible it is but I assume it only needs to be lightly held. As for holding the movement instead of the holder won't be possible in this scenario as one hand will be puling on the stem while the other pushes the spring down. That was my initial concern is how the hell can I do this with only one pair of hands. All the other times I've had to remove the stem hasn't been a problem, apart from the force required to release the stem from the setting lever, but now I need to fit the face and hands its sent me into panic mode. If it had the screw type release things would be a lot simpler but that's life 😀   Another thing I will need to consider is once the dial and hands are fitted and the movement is sitting in the case I will need to turn it over to put the case screws in. I saw a vid on Wristwatch revival where he lightly fitted the crystal and bezel so he could turn it over, is this the only option or is there another method?      
    • Hi Jon, do You think that relation spring torque - amplitude is linear? I would rather guess that the amplitude should be proportional to the square of the torque. I had once idea to check it, but still haven't.
×
×
  • Create New...