Jump to content

Replacement Hairspring - Options?


Recommended Posts

I am struggling to replace the balance complete (or hairspring) on a very rare and inaccessible movement, a Tudor caliber 2461. The movement, balance, and balance staff are all in excellent condition. The hairspring is not - it's broken. 

My first instinct was to order a replacement balance complete. Unfortunately it's not an easy one to come by. 

My second idea was to buy donor movements with compatible specs (Hamilton 678, 679, 692, etc) - KIF shock system, 18000 beat rate, and one fixed regulation arm. Still waiting on delivery of some I purchased. 

My third idea is to simply try to buy a hairspring to spec. Is there a way to buy complete hairsprings (wound, with collet, and stud)? 

Thanks! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Dr ranfft lists a host of calibers of the same generation/family to 2461, those balance completes that beat the same would fit your watch( your best bet) and springs off of them would have the same springness ( CGS) therefore compatable with the balance you have. 

 Dedicated hairsprings as you speak of with stud and collet attached which all you got to do is to install existed for many calibers and might be found specially on ebay. 

Another point is Tudor expectedly used specifically high grade hairsprings. 

Regs

Joe

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nucejoe said:

 Dr ranfft lists a host of calibers of the same generation/family to 2461, those balance completes that beat the same would fit your watch( your best bet) and springs off of them would have the same springness ( CGS) therefore compatable with the balance you have. 

 Dedicated hairsprings as you speak of with stud and collet attached which all you got to do is to install existed for many calibers and might be found specially on ebay. 

Another point is Tudor expectedly used specifically high grade hairsprings. 

Regs

Joe

 

Thanks! 
I flip between the Jules Borel caliber reference and Ranfft to figure out what parts and movements are compatible. 
The harder part is finding similarly high grade donor watches without high price tags. 
A couple follow up questions: 

Is there an easy or consistent way to determine the collet size by movement type/caliber, manufacturer, or some detail like shock system? I need a .6mm collet size. 
I’ve been eyeing up Hamilton’s as potential good donors. Can you think of others you’d recommend targeting? 
Also to your point about beat rates, if I found a different family of calibers that beat at the same rate, could I harvest springs from them? For example, ETA 1080’s? 

Edited by mzinski
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mzinski said:

Also to your point about beat rates, if I found a different family of calibers that beat at the same rate, could I harvest springs from them? For example, ETA 1080’s?

I wouldn’t choose a balance complete from an ETA 1080 since it has a different base caliber.
My curiosity of why I have so many balances completes for ETA 2390 at home got answered with this question too, it seems to fit a TUDOR Cal. 2461 too.
A quick search in the BestFit database confirms my suspicions.
So if you want to try a balance complete out for this one I would try the 2390 one or some in that family. (Note the difference in the roller table)

 

ROL TUDOR 2461.png

Edited by HSL
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There you are, as advised above , same beat doesn't neccessarily mean neither  interchangability, compatibility nor incompatibility, 1080 hairspring might not/ might have same CGS as 2390, if you are lucky its CGS might be close enough to vibrate with 2390 balance. Even between members of same family its the same CGS which means compatible but not neccessarily interchangable right away.

2 hours ago, mzinski said:

 

Is there an easy or consistent way to determine the collet size by movement type/caliber, manufacturer, or some detail like shock system? I need a .6mm collet size. 
 

Go by staff, see what staff its suppose to fit on or has come off of. 

Any hairspring will eventually vibrate with a balance so compatibility is limited by the space available on the balance wheel. There are also factors such as stability of the beat, impulse energy .... but that is a designers concern I think.

I summary any of calibers Dr ranfft says no difference is known between them and 2461, would fit right into your watch.

I doubt if hamilton's hairspring grade meets Tudors standards, but what do I know. ?

 Good luck pal.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, clockboy said:

Replacing hairsprings is really difficult due to finding the correct spring. I have a draw full of hairsprings purchased over the years but rarely find one that is suitable.

10 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

There you are, as advised above , same beat doesn't neccessarily mean neither  interchangability, compatibility nor incompatibility,

the problem is manufacturing tolerances of balance wheels. Traditionally every single hairspring is vibrated to a specific balance wheel. Exceptions to the rule are hairsprings that are manufactured first to very exacting specifications. Typically these are over coil hairsprings, the over coil has to be formed exacting locations. Then the balance wheel is matched by adjusting the timing screws.

Simplistic traditionally is two identical watches swap they hairspring is and it won't keep time because are not manufactured to close enough tolerances for that to occur. At least until relatively modern times perhaps.

References are interesting? Like the first link for different balance wheels when I figured out which one everyone thinks it is time to go with that whether it's right or not. Then look at the balance staffs think the balance wheels are confusing look at all the different staffs good we don't have to worry about that but that does appear to be a lot of variations.

But seeing as how the group seems to think that? Okay group likes 2390 but it looks like the base model at the link below is 2451?

so for the first link click on the right balance complete correspondence and 2390 scroll down to the bottom of the list almost andlooks like the available at the third link a bargain price. I suppose you could find one of the other balance completes and yes they would be cheaper but. Why go with cheaper when there it is.

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=TUD_2461

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=[^[DYE\

https://www.jewelerssupplies.com/rolex-tudor-2402-balance-complete-2402.721.html

 

 

 

Rolex tutor balance completes lots of them.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

the problem is manufacturing tolerances of balance wheels. Traditionally every single hairspring is vibrated to a specific balance wheel. Exceptions to the rule are hairsprings that are manufactured first to very exacting specifications. Typically these are over coil hairsprings, the over coil has to be formed exacting locations. Then the balance wheel is matched by adjusting the timing screws.

Simplistic traditionally is two identical watches swap they hairspring is and it won't keep time because are not manufactured to close enough tolerances for that to occur. At least until relatively modern times perhaps.

References are interesting? Like the first link for different balance wheels when I figured out which one everyone thinks it is time to go with that whether it's right or not. Then look at the balance staffs think the balance wheels are confusing look at all the different staffs good we don't have to worry about that but that does appear to be a lot of variations.

But seeing as how the group seems to think that? Okay group likes 2390 but it looks like the base model at the link below is 2451?

so for the first link click on the right balance complete correspondence and 2390 scroll down to the bottom of the list almost andlooks like the available at the third link a bargain price. I suppose you could find one of the other balance completes and yes they would be cheaper but. Why go with cheaper when there it is.

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=TUD_2461

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=[^[DYE\

https://www.jewelerssupplies.com/rolex-tudor-2402-balance-complete-2402.721.html

 

 

 

Rolex tutor balance completes lots of them.JPG

Thanks John! I was going down the route of the 2402, arriving at donor watches and thinking about eta 1080’s. But the link to a complete balance for $250 is a very good price - it’s been ordered. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can happily report I received the balance complete from Cas-Ker today - all ready installed and running better than ever. Glad I got turned on to their availability rather than seek out a compatible hairspring or balance complete from a donor movement. 

IMG_7813.thumb.jpg.08c6742fb7b224571305732a2a8be43a.jpg

(for anyone paying attention, the dial was refinished by Bill & Sons in the UK)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is a very sad day for the industry.. For most of us being amateurs the cost of replacing parts for ETA,s etc will be beyond affordability for the customers.   see full statement below   We have now received the decision from Judge Michael Green on whether or not the High Court has jurisdiction to hear our claim against Swatch, and sadly it is not the decision we had hoped for.   As we have pointed out in previous news items (see below),the rules that Judge Green had to apply strictly prevented him from examining in any way how the Swiss Court arrived at its verdict, even if it is blatantly obvious that the verdict is wrong.   As Swatch’s lawyer was summing up in the last few minutes oft he hearing, the Judge twice pinned him asking if it was alright if, as a result of the Swiss verdict, consumers had to pay 50% more for their watch repairs. After some stumbling, their lawyer’s reply was “Yes”, so  I am quite sure that Judge Green left his court fully aware that the Swiss verdict does not reflect the norms of British Competition Law. However, the rules simply do not allow him to take that simple fact into account.   Judge Green noted that our two arguments relating firstly to British Competition Law now being different from that of the EU, and secondly to the contention that the legality of the Authorised Service Networks has not been tested, had both been mentioned in the Swiss verdict. Because they had been mentioned, he felt that to allow us to argue them again would constitute re examining the Swiss case, and could not be allowed.   As to our claim that we were denied our right to be heard because our evidence was not considered, our lawyers had argued that the evidence we provided could not have been looked at because had the Swiss Court done so, it could not have reached the conclusion that it did. In his verdict, Judge Green highlighted general statements in the Swiss verdict that evidence had been looked at, and acknowledged the arguments we made to him, but again he considered that this was re-examining the Swiss verdict, and could not be permitted.   Our case has attracted considerable interest within the Legal community, and within minutes of the decision being made public we were approached for comment by one of the largest subscription news services, Global Competition Review. They asked us two very pertinent questions, and I reproduce them for you below along with our responses, as they neatly summarise the consequences arising from our case.   What are the key takeaways?   Enormous damage has been done to the fundamentals of UK and European Competition Law by the Swiss courts. It has always been the case that the effect on consumers and competition has to be considered in any decision making, but we now have a ruling that states even monopolists can remove wholesale markets from the supply chain without any consumer benefit based justification. Those entities looking to subvert Competition Law and exploit consumers for their own benefit will be looking at this very carefully.   Has the court made the wrong decision? If so, will you appeal?   The issue lies not with the High Court, but rather with cross border jurisdiction treaties that have no requirement in them for foreign jurisdictions applying UK law to take account of the Ratio Legis [a legal term for the fundamental reasoning why the law was written] of that law, and have no remedy within them for UK Courts to overcome decisions that clearly do not.    After eight years of work, and a very considerable sum in legal costs, I can not begin to tell you how disappointed I am at this outcome. For the time being, there is no further route through the British Courts that Cousins can follow. However, I promised that we would fight to the end, and that promise stands.   The UK is no longer part of the Lugano Convention, whose rules Judge Green has applied, and as yet nothing permanent has replaced it. The political tide turned against repair prevention by restricting supply of spare parts some time ago, and our efforts on behalf of the Watch Repair industry have resulted in high level contacts within several Government Departments. You can be sure that we will keep working to overcome this unjust situation that we now all find ourselves in.    I will keep you advised.   Kind regards   Anthony
    • Dell fancy a challenge🤣   https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/285785684626?itmmeta=01HT29WVJY21Q94C73GYHGBTFX&hash=item428a277a92:g:15YAAOSwNRVmBAUz&itmprp=enc%3AAQAJAAAA0DIe4QLQBW66rSyIMiyBuk8GY%2B86pQ%2BQnxGbcNq7egAGe5DIs9YMmiWJIbZtMSxwNJIiJxuojbq523IeUSBQ6pJEIQ0tfz2ChrBR03BksmKINyklg1IK4GAfAcYY9Hta9wVeSZSZN7ZCNAfZTgKs9c4%2BUIUZ3Qjc3QjUXDn2uPRo1FiYOEewMG5A26EXb%2BclBgrqtbOmM6P3bea%2F8ZImOAXNI1HtbmtMk84pIGoM6ISwaM1PKFuADtTFMccS5e3ZjndCbXYXHrW3CecsV0edw3M%3D|tkp%3ABk9SR8q588nQYw Darwin’s theory of evolution has not been proven to be absolutely.  😀 
    • A already know the size movement I have the problem is the dial a had purchased has a dimension 20.6mm wide a want to find a watch case that going to fit the dial perfectly 
    • Hi.  I would like to take issue here regarding battery driven , watches, clocks,etc. I will and do repair these clocks in fact I have sever al in my collection as well as the regular mechanical ones. I have one on my mantle piece over 60 years old tha belonged to my wife’s Aunt,  long gone Iam afraid and it has been cleaned etc and never missed a beat and is accurate. Every one has their preduices as regards Electrical /electronic Horology but I regard it as part of the progress time line of the art of Horology and to be treated as such. Like Darwin’s theory of evolution it evolved.  Two cavemen knocking rocks together and a shard broke off , looking at it he worked out if it was stuck on the end of a stick he would have a spear. Likewise his pal seeing what he was up to picked up a piece  and did the same, now that’s evolution. Some clockmaker decided to build a clock that ran with a battery and no spring to wind up and break, progress and both the mechanical and battery driven clocks evolved, the battery ones got better to the point that if it broke you changed the complete unit. Likewise watches did the same but both can be repaired by people who approach Horology with an open mind without preduice.  We all have our likes and dislikes bu I for one would never dismiss any technology because I don’t like it.   The mobile phone is a good example of modern technology at work as is the automotive industry. There buttons and switches in my car I don’t use because to me they are not nesessary but I still drive the car.
    • I haven't gone through all the reading of what it might be or not. The first thing I would do if nothing obvious stands out is replace the mainspring, you have to start at the source of the power. Nine times out of ten that is the problem.  
×
×
  • Create New...