Jump to content

Anyone come across this Rolex Submariner dial anomaly?


Recommended Posts

Hello all. My first post-introduction post on the forum, so please bear with me. But I wanted to reach out to this community as I am hoping that someone in the watch-repair realm has come across this anomaly.

I recently came across an interesting 1984 16800 Rolex Submariner with an 8.2 mil serial. At first glance everything seems to be in order. However, upon close examination the dial reveals something interesting ... it looks like it's been stamped/struck twice. Comparing the text font and other features, with the exception of the double stamping it looks to be a MKIV dial with all the right features. But the fact that it seems to have been overstamped certainly raises some questions.

I've posted about this issue on Rolex Forums, and there are two prevailing views there: (1) I've never seen this before and is therefore a fake, and (2) everything about the font/dial looks genuine and it is likely a factory error that got past QC.

In addition, I've reached out to several well-known watchmakers and all that have seen the pictures say that they see no indication of a counterfeit dial, though only one has said that he's heard of a double-strike dial in the past.

I also took the watch a local Rolex AD which has an on-site Rolex trained tech. His verdict, "there is nothing in this watch that would indicate that any part of it is not genuine." Particularly with respect to the dial, in his opinion the text looks correct, the spacing looks correct, the texture of the lume plots show the characteristic waffle pattern, the lume reacts to UV light as it should. Basically he's never seen anything like it but he also couldn't find anything that would make him believe that it's a refinish job and he thinks it likely got past QC without being noticed.

With all that, I am curious if anyone here has come across a Rolex dial like this. Am I holding a one-off fake or a one-off genuine?

Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Also, if anyone has any thoughts on where else I could go to get a more definitive answer, I'd love to hear those suggestions.


Thanks
 

Click on any of the pictures for higher resolution versions.

 

<a href="https://ibb.co/0qWhmT0"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/H7MnB6c/20210430-095820.jpg" alt="20210430-095820" border="0"></a>
<a href="https://ibb.co/SPH2Nkz"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/KXBY6tJ/20210430-095745.jpg" alt="20210430-095745" border="0"></a>
<a href="https://ibb.co/jyG1WS6"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/Lx62J3k/20210430-095544.jpg" alt="20210430-095544" border="0"></a>
<a href="https://ibb.co/wYnCVFw"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/DLBkhH8/20210430-095644.jpg" alt="20210430-095644" border="0"></a>
<a href="https://ibb.co/BBb7DC0"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/L1mqwZV/20210430-084134.jpg" alt="20210430-084134" border="0"></a>
<a href="https://ibb.co/w7xj3H9"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/9hCSzXF/20210430-084300.jpg" alt="20210430-084300" border="0"></a>
<a href="https://ibb.co/rs3MznY"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/m80t2Qk/20210430-084203.jpg" alt="20210430-084203" border="0"></a>

 

 

Edited by s0nic2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, s0nic2 said:

Hello all. My first post-introduction post on the forum, so please bear with me. But I wanted to reach out to this community as I am hoping that someone in the watch-repair realm has come across this anomaly.

I recently came across an interesting 1984 16800 Rolex Submariner with an 8.2 mil serial. At first glance everything seems to be in order. However, upon close examination the dial reveals something interesting ... it looks like it's been stamped/struck twice. Comparing the text font and other features, with the exception of the double stamping it looks to be a MKIV dial with all the right features. But the fact that it seems to have been overstamped certainly raises some questions.

I've posted about this issue on Rolex Forums, and there are two prevailing views there: (1) I've never seen this before and is therefore a fake, and (2) everything about the font/dial looks genuine and it is likely a factory error that got past QC.

In addition, I've reached out to several well-known watchmakers and all that have seen the pictures say that they see no indication of a counterfeit dial, though only one has said that he's heard of a double-strike dial in the past.

I also took the watch a local Rolex AD which has an on-site Rolex trained tech. His verdict, "there is nothing in this watch that would indicate that any part of it is not genuine." Particularly with respect to the dial, in his opinion the text looks correct, the spacing looks correct, the texture of the lume plots show the characteristic waffle pattern, the lume reacts to UV light as it should. Basically he's never seen anything like it but he also couldn't find anything that would make him believe that it's a refinish job and he thinks it likely got past QC without being noticed.

With all that, I am curious if anyone here has come across a Rolex dial like this. Am I holding a one-off fake or a one-off genuine?

Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Also, if anyone has any thoughts on where else I could go to get a more definitive answer, I'd love to hear those suggestions.


Thanks
 

Click on any of the pictures for higher resolution versions.

 

<a href="https://ibb.co/0qWhmT0"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/H7MnB6c/20210430-095820.jpg" alt="20210430-095820" border="0"></a>
<a href="https://ibb.co/SPH2Nkz"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/KXBY6tJ/20210430-095745.jpg" alt="20210430-095745" border="0"></a>
<a href="https://ibb.co/jyG1WS6"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/Lx62J3k/20210430-095544.jpg" alt="20210430-095544" border="0"></a>
<a href="https://ibb.co/wYnCVFw"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/DLBkhH8/20210430-095644.jpg" alt="20210430-095644" border="0"></a>
<a href="https://ibb.co/BBb7DC0"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/L1mqwZV/20210430-084134.jpg" alt="20210430-084134" border="0"></a>
<a href="https://ibb.co/w7xj3H9"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/9hCSzXF/20210430-084300.jpg" alt="20210430-084300" border="0"></a>
<a href="https://ibb.co/rs3MznY"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/m80t2Qk/20210430-084203.jpg" alt="20210430-084203" border="0"></a>

 

 

Sorry but the pics are not showing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, clockboy said:

Oh I am well aware of the model that I have.  I am more curious about the double-strike on the dial and whether anyone here that works on watches may have come across something similar in their line of work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I wish I could help you but I find this very interesting. I hope it’s legit and it sounds like there’s a good chance it is But there is a guy who has a web article about vintage Rolex dials and how to spot fakes or legit anomalies and he may be able to help. I’ll try to copy the link but just in case it doesn’t work it’s called the Rolex passion report. I don’t know how to contact them but give it a shot.

https://rolexpassionreport.com/21770/the-importance-of-the-vintage-rolex-dial/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thank you so much, Hector and CJ. I appreciate the tech sheet and the video. Gasp, I think I will make the attempt. What's the worst that can happen? I think there may be a new balance complete in my future, though.  I'll update the post and let you know the result. R, Frank  
    • So here is the new base (v 2.1), I made it so that the base will fit over and swallow the stump of the hand pusher tool (or at least my clone of the tool), I also reduced the OD of the bottom skirt a little as it looked/felt a little large, here are a few pictures and the fake .pdf file which you need to convert to .zip once downloaded.   The cut-out seen on the below image on the bottom of the base should swallow the OD (40 mm, +0.1 mm tolerance) of the stump and the height of the stump 9.5mm (measured to 9.1mm, but rounded to 9.5mm) - let me know if this works for your tool.   Note, I think you may need to print supports for the new internal shelf created? Here is the fake .pdf for just the FreeCAD base file and 3mf files Modular Movement Holder.pdf Here is the fake pdf for complete set of the new base and ring FreeCAD/3mf files: Modular Movement Holder base and ring v 2.1.pdf However, I'm wondering how often you could use this feature, adding the dial usually increases the OD of the movement, so you would need a new (larger) adapter ring tuned to the OD of the dial and I wouldn't like to grip the dial in any kind of movement holder if It could be avoided for fear of damaging it. Maybe I'm misunderstanding you?
    • Hi Frank, you have dived headlong into the deep end. Hairspring work has to be the scariest thing a newbie has to tackle. Your hairspring appears to be bent and just putting it back into the regulator would not allow the balance to work properly. It might start oscillating but the performance would not be good. The proper thing to do is to unstud the hairspring, remove the hairspring from the balance, reinstall the hairspring on the stud carrier, reshape the endcurve and centre the collet to the balance jewel hole. This challenge would either make you or break you. Hope that you will be able to fix your watch. Welcome to the world of watchmaking.  Watch this video. It think it'll give you an idea of the task ahead. From your 1st photo, I think you have a etachron type stud. Let me see if I can find a video on how to remove it from the arm.
    • Have read of the Tech Sheet attached on the balance section page 12. It may be bent but until you reposition it back in the regulator pins you'll never know. Cheers CJ 4R35B_4R36A.pdf
    • Aloha All, My Seiko 4R35B movement stopped working today. Upon closer inspection, it looks like the balance spring came out of the regulator pin. This is my first time working on a balance. Any advice on how to get this spring repositioned (back to normal)? I'm pretty sure that while adjusting the beat error on this movement, I must have turned the stud (I didn't even know they turned), and the spring eventually fell out.  Will the spring go back to even spacing when it's back in the pin, or does it look bent? Thanks, Frank  
×
×
  • Create New...