Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I went to an estate sale at the corner and befriended the seller. I asked about watches and he told me he had some at home and since I seemed nice, he’d bring them to me. 

He had some nice pieces and after disassembling this pocket watch, I’m under the assumption it’s a no name.

The dial material is copper and I assume porcelain because it’s hand painted. The only word on the movement is “Garantee” and it’s my first cylinder escapement.

If anyone has clues to the movement manufacturer or dates, please comment

61D1E495-9827-4E24-88E8-EB6529D92464.jpeg

E6B17990-D16D-4A51-9C27-DC40BDE5469F.jpeg

2A47F2D3-2C7B-48D5-9B0D-69BE4E132066.jpeg

7D0CD987-F5A7-4E78-89FB-D8DA04778C76.jpeg

5457EA50-CF3F-4F41-B800-8A6F7F1344BA.jpeg

884D54CD-DE86-41B3-9C3A-6721B04DF8A6.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish I could help more, but that's going to be a tough one.  I get the impression that this (likely) Swiss lever-set movement was made for the English or American market, since the balance cock reads "Slow" & "Fast" rather than Avance & Retard, but that's a guess.  
In your fifth picture, showing the various parts, the underside of the barrel bridge is depicted, off to the right there.  There seem to be two maker's marks on the bottom surface of the bridge by the locator pin.  Could we have a better, closer picture of those please?  Can your camera do that?
The bottom surface of the balance cock looks like it may have marks stamped on it also, but I think those just may be a portion of the serial number.  To be safe though, may we also have a good picture of it as well?  Or if they are just scuffs, then no worries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know, it could be American.  It gives that impression the more I look at it.  I don't see a lot of American cylinder movements, so I tend to think of them as a Swiss or French thing mostly, but there were a few here and there.  There's not a lot to go on, but I wonder which American makers dabbled with cylinders...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm American and don't know of any native makers of cylinder movements. There were a lot of what's called "swiss fakes" which were swiss made movements mimicking the American style, and I'm sure some cylinder movements made it in that category (some swiss makers were producing cylinder movements up to the '20s, probably using up old stock against high demand).

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nickelsilver said:

I'm American and don't know of any native makers of cylinder movements. There were a lot of what's called "swiss fakes" which were swiss made movements mimicking the American style, and I'm sure some cylinder movements made it in that category (some swiss makers were producing cylinder movements up to the '20s, probably using up old stock against high demand).

I remember discussing Swiss fakes in other posts.  I've been researching and cannot yet come up with an American make that used cylinder movements either.  I was sure there was at least a couple, but maybe not.  Now, as far as English producers, I've heard of Dwerrihouse (sp?) who in fact would sell Dutch cylinder movements for the English market, casing them in "Colonial" brand cases.  And that *might* explain why it says "Fast & Slow" on the regulator.  But the more I look at this,  the more it temps me to speculate whether it might be a very early Swiss Fake.
But all in all, I really don't know yet what to make of it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

well, first off, i made a mistake by posting in the wrong area! Ill get better with time.

I wasnt exactly sure what to take pics of, so Ill have those others that have been asked for posted tomorrow.  I know the movement has pairs of digits stamped but i figured those were part numbers.  Ill get photos of any numbers and post.

 

The side of the movement does say swiss made on the main bridge. what a funny place for it! I havent looked up etymology of the spelling of guarantee being "garantee" There may be some time period it was a common spelling or region. For some reason, it strikes me as victorian 

 

The watches in with the rest were all american.  a couple elgin and westclocks   and  the elgin were from 1890 and 1900. This would be the outlier if its not american.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been looking into this and I'm sure this is not a swiss fake. The swiss faked American P/Watches because they were so expensive and high quality movements, they also had similar American names printed on the dials.  This movement is of very poor quality, no jewels for the train. The reason I asked about how many feet the dial has is this can also help as to if it's a fake or not. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys are super sleuths! I appreciate the knowledge.

there are two dial feet, and I have no idea how this figures into the equation. Can you share?

the number I see is 5606 and I know there’s one more. I’ll have to take the movement further apart if it will help. This train wasn’t that big of deal to line up.

theres a filed section on the edge of the main palette and I don’t know if it was from the manufacturer or a repair. Either way, it’s a sloppy job of removing metal

 

is there anything else I can provide?

3DB472B5-5491-4B88-8FC3-0C5DCFB62464.jpeg

B81BFB21-AD71-48C8-9917-37AAFC3ADF05.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two dial feet. Now we do have a problem, because American P/W's normally have three and the Swiss fakes have two. I cannot find out any info of Swiss fake cylinder P/W's. To be fair I'm not sure what we have here now. I was hoping it had three feet that would have cleared it up.

 

After all this it is steering us in the face the clue is Champion. I can confirm it is American. It might have a Dueber Champion grade case and a Hampden Champion grade movement.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well...this got complicated quickly.
With the two dial feet, the cylinder movement, and the cut of the escape wheel (perfect half-circle cuts, unlike Mudge) the "Swiss" stamping, the "Garantee" script, all in all I'm pretty certain that the movement, at least, is a Swiss one.  But maybe not intended to be a "fake" of anything.
As soon as I read that metal had been filed away, I began to look closer again.  The times that I've seen metal filed away from the outer edges of the surfaces on a movement, it was done to aid in getting the movement to fit into a case where it was tight in certain places.  I'm starting to speculate if this is an incident of someone wanting to put a Swiss movement into an American case, and doing what they can to make it fit?  Does it look that way to anyone else here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not that easy to to fit a different movement into a case that isn't made for the movement. First you have to be able to line up the winding you have the height, the diameter and it needs to be able to fit properly in order for the case to close. The dial can cause problems for the bezel.  It isn't impossible but it is highly unlikely that it's a marriage.   

Who's to say the file markings haven't been made by someone that was inexperienced in re-casing this movement. An apprentice as an example.   

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think youre onto something. 

I shared a photo showing the filing. Not sure what it’s for however, it doesn’t line up with anything. 

After reading your case refitting description, I added a photo of some strange bend in the case lip. It seems to be to allow the cock some room to live in. There were many divots added to give some balance wheel end play, so it may be a refitted movement and the ill fitting case was very close but needed “finesse” to get it to run.

im going to go with that and say this mystery is solved!

thank you !! 

image.jpg

C9884289-486C-4B14-AC1B-DA5B760D00CD.jpeg

01FE55A2-E3EA-4E4E-9340-387F1C922D47.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wanted to share something else Ive found with this watch. Saying Ive not seen this before doesnt hold weight because Im new, but have you seen this before?

What materials materials were jewels made from? This one has an inclusion of some other natural material. Was this common?

PICA0026.jpg

PICA0028.jpg

PICA0027.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thank you so much, Hector and CJ. I appreciate the tech sheet and the video. Gasp, I think I will make the attempt. What's the worst that can happen? I think there may be a new balance complete in my future, though.  I'll update the post and let you know the result. R, Frank  
    • So here is the new base (v 2.1), I made it so that the base will fit over and swallow the stump of the hand pusher tool (or at least my clone of the tool), I also reduced the OD of the bottom skirt a little as it looked/felt a little large, here are a few pictures and the fake .pdf file which you need to convert to .zip once downloaded.   The cut-out seen on the below image on the bottom of the base should swallow the OD (40 mm, +0.1 mm tolerance) of the stump and the height of the stump 9.5mm (measured to 9.1mm, but rounded to 9.5mm) - let me know if this works for your tool.   Note, I think you may need to print supports for the new internal shelf created? Here is the fake .pdf for just the FreeCAD base file and 3mf files Modular Movement Holder.pdf Here is the fake pdf for complete set of the new base and ring FreeCAD/3mf files: Modular Movement Holder base and ring v 2.1.pdf However, I'm wondering how often you could use this feature, adding the dial usually increases the OD of the movement, so you would need a new (larger) adapter ring tuned to the OD of the dial and I wouldn't like to grip the dial in any kind of movement holder if It could be avoided for fear of damaging it. Maybe I'm misunderstanding you?
    • Hi Frank, you have dived headlong into the deep end. Hairspring work has to be the scariest thing a newbie has to tackle. Your hairspring appears to be bent and just putting it back into the regulator would not allow the balance to work properly. It might start oscillating but the performance would not be good. The proper thing to do is to unstud the hairspring, remove the hairspring from the balance, reinstall the hairspring on the stud carrier, reshape the endcurve and centre the collet to the balance jewel hole. This challenge would either make you or break you. Hope that you will be able to fix your watch. Welcome to the world of watchmaking.  Watch this video. It think it'll give you an idea of the task ahead. From your 1st photo, I think you have a etachron type stud. Let me see if I can find a video on how to remove it from the arm.
    • Have read of the Tech Sheet attached on the balance section page 12. It may be bent but until you reposition it back in the regulator pins you'll never know. Cheers CJ 4R35B_4R36A.pdf
    • Aloha All, My Seiko 4R35B movement stopped working today. Upon closer inspection, it looks like the balance spring came out of the regulator pin. This is my first time working on a balance. Any advice on how to get this spring repositioned (back to normal)? I'm pretty sure that while adjusting the beat error on this movement, I must have turned the stud (I didn't even know they turned), and the spring eventually fell out.  Will the spring go back to even spacing when it's back in the pin, or does it look bent? Thanks, Frank  
×
×
  • Create New...