Jump to content

Ball bearings for clock bushings


HectorLooi

Recommended Posts

I came across a video on YouTube where a worn bushing was replaced with a ball bearing. The repaired wheel was able to spin freely for a very long time. 

If you fast forward to around 6:00, he shows a worn 2nd wheel hole replaced with a ball bearing. (OH, please look past the use of a power drill to enlarge the hole.)

What are your opinions on the use of ball bearings?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I just watched it all and I would suggest that he has not achieved very much at all. If you watch after 7:45 minutes, maybe it is the refresh rate on my Mac, but I cannot see the bearing race actually turning when he is spinning the wheel. Also, as he has the bearing on the top plate of this wheel in his demonstration the wheel would be sitting on its lower pivot on the bottom plate as he shows the bearing slipping onto the top pivot at 7:07.

I am not an experienced clockmaker, but I don't think there is any advantage to doing this at all. If the pivot spins in the inner race, the pivot will wear away now as the race is hardened. When the pivot is in the brass plate, the plate wears away. That would no longer happen in this case. Also, if the bearing happened to 'walk' out of the movement plate for whatever reason, the damage that would happen then would quite likely ruin quite a few parts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see two things wrong with this. The first he has removed far to much brass in order to fit that ridiculous bush. You are supposed to remove as little as possible of the original. Second it is not in keeping with the clock, it sticks out like a sore thumb, again you repair as near to the original as possible. I watched a few of his videos and I'm not impressed at all. If I had my way 99% of videos I watch on Youtube about clock repairing I would remove. They give skilled repairers or restorers a bad name. 

Any new clock repairers on this forum. Do not follow what this idiot is showing you and avoid his videos. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, noted. I like to explore new ways of doing old things. One material that has intrigued me for a long time is Aluminium Magnesium Boride (BAM). It's supposed to be one of the hardest and most slippery substance known to man.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminium_magnesium_boride

However, I have not seen any real world applications of this material. Can you imagine if we had bushings or bearings made of this ceramic alloy. If we could coat metal surfaces with it, we could have machines that would never wear out.

And there lies the crux of the matter. Which manufacturer would invest in a technology that could put them out of business.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Hector if only.  The machines of today have built in obsolescence with a life of 5 to10 years max. And as you rightly say what manufacturer would embrace a technology that would give bearings and bushings a life time of use. Such technology would put manufacturers out of business. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I'm for the use of new technologies and materials, I do draw the line when it comes to doing sacrilegious things.

Like whenever I see a vintage clock that had been gutted and fitted with a $2 quartz movement. And the smug seller advertises it as repaired, fixed and modernized. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no other way, than repair as un obtrusivly and as near to the original as possible keeping the whole clock intact as is. I repair quartz clocks, and when ever possible repair the same unit or re fit a unit as close yo the original as possible.  We can all lob in a cheap chinese unit costing a £1 and make it work.  I have seen some nice clock cases that have been "converted" using cheap units, the clock is then ruined. Most clocks can be repaired but as ever its economics, down to cost.  How many good clocks have suffered with that in mind. Hundreds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I first watched this I did so without sound. (in our lounge and others were watching TV)

I just listened to it with sound. What a mess of a video. It chops and changes between topics (i.e. the preacher moment) and I have only just heard & noticed that he used a bushing inside the inner race of the bearing. What an absolute waste of time and effort as well as looking completely out of place.

I'm with @oldhippy. Not a very instructional video.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess it's also because the clock was not designed for ball bearings and the bearings were not designed for clocks. If it were executed correctly, the clock could potentially be maintenance free. But I can already hear the clockmakers scream "Why would we want that?"

I like things that lasts forever and need practically no maintenance. It's probably a trait I acquired from having too many expat teachers from Scotland. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ball bearings are marketed by Butterworth clocks in the U.S., a distributor of German clock movements. As I understand it, the bearing mod came about as a result of the terrible plated pivots some of the German makers started using in the last quarter of the 20th century; many clockmakers feel that once the plating starts to peel off, the soft steel underneath is unsuitable as a pivot, so you either repivot or replace the whole wheel. With the bearings (installed as intended), the pivot is a firm fit in the inner race via a bushing, and voila. It seems initially they were just for the great wheels, now with cheap miniature bearings they are marketing them for more.

 

They also sell a "pivot polishing system" which looks like a time consuming way to make crappy pivots- just went to find a vid (there are a couple), and had to laugh out loud- our dear OldHippy seems to have commented hahahahahaha.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nickelsilver said:

They also sell a "pivot polishing system" which looks like a time consuming way to make crappy pivots- just went to find a vid (there are a couple), and had to laugh out loud- our dear OldHippy seems to have commented hahahahahaha.

Dear God!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

haha... classic case of 'a solution in search of a problem' . The balls are not moving.. (7.55). If the bearing was working properly they would roll around. The bearing looks like it will be thicker than the plate.. this means it will not be really secure..

Interesting but ultimately pointless.

Anilv

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

On the question of pivots I've notice you can now buy "quick pivots" which looks like they fit over the the top of the old part. not having a lathe to make new ones this does seem like a simple solution but what do people think? are they any good?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're a brave one. I didn't dare ask OH any more heretical questions lest he excommunicate me.

I think it should work but I think a lathe is still needed to cut off the old pinion and shape the arbor to the correct diameter to fit into the quick pivot.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then I suggest the Unimat 3 this is what I have and it will handle anything right up to Longcase clocks including the barrels and center wheel. You can still buy accessories even though most are second hand. Some of the lathes I have seen on ebay even have the milling attachment (you can get that separately if you wish)   

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Got another one today! It took 10 weeks, but finally arrived. Fairly complete but I added the pivot guage. The burnisher and bow came with the tool. The case is a bit rough and the tool pretty dirty, but trying to decide how much I want to restore.
    • OK, so long story short, I'm working my way through Mark's courses using a "Sea-gul ST36" (or ST3600 from some vendors) AKA an ETA 6497 clone. as a practice piece.  I've had it fully appart and cleaned it, and have had it fully back together an "running", but only briefly as my oil hadn't arrived at the time.  In the course of that work, I saw no markings on the movement that would tell me if it was a true Sea-gul or just a clone of their clone of the original ETA movement. Well, fast forward to this weekend, when my oils arrived in my mailbox and I sat down to try my hand at oiling.  Everything was going swimmingly until I got to the shock setting on the top of the balance cock.  I was able to open the lyre spring without issue, but in attempting to swing the open to access the cap jewel and chaton, I apparently accidentally pressed the launch button as I sent the lyre spring into low earth orbit.  Like most things that make into such orbits it came back down at a place not too far from where it started, but of course that also means that it is no longer in the setting. So my task is now to get said spring back into setting.  What I have read so far tells me that I seem to have two options: Another thread here seems to indicate that the spring came out without taking the balance cock apart, therefore it should go back without the need for that procedure.  That seems a bit pie in the sky for me, but the posts in said thread also gave some high level information about how to get the spring back in (putting it at an angle to the channel cut in the cock and canted so that the tabs fit in the slots, followed by some "wiggling" to get it turned around the right direction.)  I've tried this a couple of times, which have lead to more trips to low earth orbit, but with successful recovery of the orbital vehicle after each trip.  This thread also suggests that what I did to cause the initial launch was to push the spring "back" with more pressure on one side than the other, which put it under tension and caused it to deform out the slot either on one side or at the end (where there is apparently no "back stop".) The other option appears to be varying degrees of disassembly of the balance cock.  Some things I've read suggest that the whole shock setting needs to come out, while other threads here suggest that I only need to remove the regulator arm and the arm carrying the balance stud.  After the last trip the spring made, this is seeming like a better option, but I'm super short on details on how to do what needs to be done.  if I am following correctly: I need to loose the balance spring stud screw so the stud is not held in the arm. I need to somehow disengage the balance spring from the regulator (all the regulators I've seen in videos look nothing like what I see on the balance cock I have.)  What I've seen on the interwebs is a couple of "pins" that the spring passes through.  What I see on my assembly is something that looks more like a single pin with a "V" shaped notch cut in the bottom of it.  The spring is secured in that notch with something that I guessed was glue, Posts here suggest that on some of these movements glue is in fact used.  So I'm trying to figure out how to tell, how to soften dissolve it (I'm guessing IPA or acetone) and how to put it back when I'm done (superglue?  UV glue?) With the spring detached from the cock, I've read that the regulator and stud carrier are basically glorified C clamps around the shock setting and that one removes them by slipping a razor blade under one side of each and prizing them up.  I assume that they go back in the reverse manner like another C clamp, but that again is only a guess.  The place I got this information from seemed to leave that bit out. Once I have one or both arms off the shock setting the above mentioned post seemed to indicate that I could just slide the spring back in the slot, though again, I'm interpolating between the lines I read.  The alternative that I've seen demonstrated on high end movements on Youtube is to remove the entire shock setting and to replace the spring from "underneath" rotating the setting so that spring basically falls into place. I'm not anxious to try this method, as I don't have a jeweling tool to put the shock setting back into place.  That not to mention that the professional watch maker who did the demonstration described "fiddly work." So at the end of the day I'm looking for a little guidance on which pathway to follow, or if I've missed something obvious, a new direction to follow.  If this is a repair that just need to wait until my skills improve I'm totally good with that, I can get another of these movements in relatively short order, I just don't want to treat this one as disposable, and I do want to make an honest effort at fixing it and learning from this experience. Thank you in advance for reading my ramblings and for any suggestions that you might have!
    • All the best, family always comes first, and I believe you have made the right call that you mother deserves your full attention. However, when you need a little outside distraction the guys here will always be available for some banter or a heated discussion on lubrication 🤣.
    • Wire for what? if it's steel then only certain types of steel can be hardened ie high carbon steels: "Mild steel doesn't harden very well. It doesn't have enough carbon. Get something like O1, silver steel or if you want to go full watchmaker, then Sandvik 20AP". Source
    • I'm wondering if there's any specific type of wire I should get for hardening? I would assume it doesn't matter as long as the wire doesn't melt before it is at temp. 
×
×
  • Create New...