Jump to content

Anyone been inside Seiko Crown, Sportsman, and Champions from the 1960's?


Recommended Posts

I have been looking on the Auction-Site-That-Shall-Not-Be-Named at older Seiko dress watches,specifically the Seiko Crown, Sportsman, and Champion from the 1960's. All are dress watches with a minimalist 1960's styling that I like -- kind of like a poor man's Omega Seamaster from the same era. Does any one of you have a sense of what the major design differences were among the models? On the outside, they definitely have a "family resemblance." I have a couple of the 17 Jewel Diashock Sportsmans in decent shape that run about +12 sec/day, and a couple, including a Champion, that are non-working. Were these different lines of watches sold contemporaneously? Did they share any components? Or were they separate design efforts by different Seiko factories that should be treated as different lines of evolution? My questions stem as much from a desire to take the non-working watches apart and see whether they can't be cleaned as it is from a desire to understand the brand.  I am probably "out over my skis" in terms of my level of actual expertise, but you have to start somewhere.

Thanks in advance for any insights. . .

BTW, I did ask the above question on The Watch Site, which seems to be a good place to ask question about Japanese automatics.  91 views and no responses though, so maybe it is all Seiko SKX dive watches over there.  It is a generous community when the collectibility of a watch is in question -- but on the insides of these beasties, I trust you all the most.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NewToWatches said:

I have been looking on the Auction-Site-That-Shall-Not-Be-Named at older Seiko dress watches,specifically the Seiko Crown, Sportsman, and Champion from the 1960's.

These are JDM models and not even the most popular, if you are interested in getting them or just looking at pictures look on Y! Japan auctions, not Ebay. To buy there you will need an agent, preferably not Buyee, there are much better ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jdm said:

These are JDM models and not even the most popular, if you are interested in getting them or just looking at pictures look on Y! Japan auctions, not Ebay. To buy there you will need an agent, preferably not Buyee, there are much better ones.

Interesting.  So what were the most popular model dress watches for the domestic market if these don't make the cut?   I do like the styling though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NewToWatches said:

Interesting.  So what were the most popular model dress watches for the domestic market if these don't make the cut?   I do like the styling though. 

King and Grand Seiko are the ones attracting the most collectors, for good reasons of quality, looks, and investment value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NewToWatches said:

No disrespect to JDM's answer, but I guess I still have my basic question on the innards.  It seems like incremental improvements were being made all the time to these Seiko movements. 

Which movements? On a Seiko watch that identified by the first 4 digits of the reference on the caseback, while what is printed on the dial is there to establish it's marketing line or brand in some cases. You can learn a bit more on the history of Seiko movements from the following link, and many other similar ones on the web. https://www.trovestar.com/generic/blog.php?Article=55

Quote

Any thoughts on mainspring availability?

Do you have a watch in hand already, fully serviced and tested? That is the only time when the need for a new mainspring can be established with certainty, unless it's visibly strained when taken apart. 

Just because a mainspring is 60 years old one can't assume it's to be replaced. It may have spent most of its time in a drawer, or have been replaced at some point already. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah!  Super helpful.   I see from the article you linked to that although these watches have an outwards similarity in style, their workings represent different stages of caliber development.   My working ones are a Seiko Sportsman with a movement number that looks like 2290 and one that has no dial marking but J14020 on the back.  The non-workjing ones are a Seiko Crown with a 337 movement and a Sportsman that says different things on the watch face and the back  The face appears to say SMS 15N310E and the back says 15019E.  I'll have to open them and see how the movements are stamped.

Many thanks!  This was just what I was looking for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • in general this shouldn't be any change. but in general questions like this it be nice to know the specifics of the watch in other words how was it performing before it was cased up and what is it doing now.
    • just as a reminder this watch is a Swatch group product. This will bring up a problem like spare parts and technical information. that I found some links to some information on when I talk about your watch and some of the technical and basically your watch is equivalent to 2834-2 for which I'm attaching the technical sheets. But equivalent does not mean exactly the same you want to do a search on the group for C07 as we discussed this watch before including the technical differences how it's supposed to be regulated and basically because it's watch group there is no parts availability. https://calibercorner.com/eta-caliber-c07-xxx/   https://www.chrono24.com/magazine/eta-movements-from-the-2824-2-to-the-powermatic-80-p_80840/ https://www.watchuseek.com/threads/h-10-movement-details.4636991/ eta CT_2834-2_FDE_481857_15.pdf
    • people be honest.... Swatch is evil for the watchmakers and repairers, BUT not everything in watches from Switzerland is from the Swatch-Group. As far as i know, Selitta got sacked by Swatch as a Movement-Assembler for them and they started to produce Movements in their own Name with slight Modifications. As far as i know, they sell Parts to the Market for their Movements. In most cases, if a ETA-Movement fails, it is a valid Option to replace it with a Selitta Movement, which i consider the Solution for this Mess with the Swatch-Group...... I have no Connection to anybody at Selitta, but being a Swiss-Guy, i still like to have Swiss-Made Watches, but not from the Swatch-Group.   ok ? regards, Ernst
    • Just one more greedy act by Swatch. They started a number of years ago here in the US..cutting off supplies to watchmakers that could build complications that many Swatch houses couldn't even touch. Old school masters who had gone through some of the most prestigious houses in the world. Otto Frei has some statements on their page about it. I tell all my customers to avoid new Swiss watches like the plague,..unless they just want an older one in their collection that still has some parts out on the market, or they have really deep pockets and don't mind waiting months and paying through the nose to get it back. Plenty of others to choose from..IE Seiko,..or other non-swiss brands Even a number of Chinese brands are catching up with the Swiss,..and I think that in time, their actions will be their downfall
    • Yes. If that's not what you are experiencing...start looking for something rubbing. A 1st guess is that one of the hands is rubbing against the hole in the center of the dial. Especially if you now have lower amplitude in face up/ face down positions.
×
×
  • Create New...