Jump to content

Interesting new watch tech from Frederique Constant


Recommended Posts

I saw this posted on The Watch Site.  Apparently, Frederique Constant is releasing a 40hz mechanical watch using a single-piece silicon balance in place of the traditional Swiss lever. I watched the video at the link below and was pretty impressed (but then again, that is not difficult). ? In the video, they are claiming 10x the oscillations per hour compared to a traditional balance system.  They also claim that the oscillator needs no lubrication (!) and replaces about 20 parts from a traditional watch.  I find myself wondering what the longevity and shock resistance of watches built around something like this will be.  Also, I wonder whether anyone other Frederique Constant will touch the tiny weights on the oscillator, which are apparently used to time the movement.  

I can't post a direct link to the video, but their marketing page with the video on it is here:

 

https://monochrome-watches.com/frederique-constant-slimline-monolithic-manufacture-video-review-technical-guide-specs-price/

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very impressive !

Still mechanical, but instead of a quartz crystal+stepper-motor a high frequency vibrating disk, build out of one piece.

I wonder however the longevity? Material fatigue and endurance.

Would this fantastic, innovative, highly sophisticated movement last for decades? How many 1970's quartz watches, low and high end, do actually still work on their original movement?

Then again, we mortals also do have a certain lifespan, so perhaps who cares; just enjoy while you can ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a 1994 quartz Victorinox watch that is operating on its original movement.  I guess I sort of assumed it would run until the world supply of spare batteries ran out.  But I also assume that these quartz movements are so cheap that they get replaced rather than serviced.  Any insights about that? They have moving parts so they must wear out eventually . . .right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Often the PCB (printed circuit board) or the electronic components on them fail in time. 1994 isn't the '70's jet and undoubtedly there are still some 1970's quartz watches running, but the majority have given up their duty, ended up at the bottom of a drawer or found their way to landfill.

Also I was wondering about the company above; would it still exist in 50 years time and/or be able to supply the escapement disk for this particular watch?

Still, it's perhaps a step-stone for new developments, just like the '70's, 80's ground-breaking but long gone 5.25" 360Kb floppy, the 3.5" 1.44Mb disk and soon the CD/DVD were. Who knows ?

It's for sure a fine piece of technology ?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh nice. I have a similar wedge style stump for my staking tool, so I'll give that a shot. Thanks!
    • Thank you all for the replies!  Very informative! True enough, the Gamsol took some time to evaporate and does leave a residue. So not all naphtha are created equal!  Need to find alternatives then. i was able to try Hexane recommended by Alex and it seems great.  I wonder what the cons are?
    • Yeah, I saw that in the tech sheet but I don't see how it can be adequately cleaned with the friction pinion still in place. I've accidentally pulled the arbor right out of the wheel once when I used a presto tool to try and remove it. Mark shows how he does it with the Platax tool. Those are a little too pricey for me so I got one of these from Aliexpress and I just push down on the arbor with the end of my brass tweezers. That usually gets it most of the way out and then I just grab the wheel with one hand the and the friction pinion with the other and gently rotate them until it pops off. Probably not the best way but it's seemed to work for me so far.    
    • Thanks, Jon Sounds like a plan. Obviously I'll have the face on so do you think gripping with the holder will create any problems, but I will check in the morning to see how feasible it is but I assume it only needs to be lightly held. As for holding the movement instead of the holder won't be possible in this scenario as one hand will be puling on the stem while the other pushes the spring down. That was my initial concern is how the hell can I do this with only one pair of hands. All the other times I've had to remove the stem hasn't been a problem, apart from the force required to release the stem from the setting lever, but now I need to fit the face and hands its sent me into panic mode. If it had the screw type release things would be a lot simpler but that's life 😀   Another thing I will need to consider is once the dial and hands are fitted and the movement is sitting in the case I will need to turn it over to put the case screws in. I saw a vid on Wristwatch revival where he lightly fitted the crystal and bezel so he could turn it over, is this the only option or is there another method?      
    • Hi Jon, do You think that relation spring torque - amplitude is linear? I would rather guess that the amplitude should be proportional to the square of the torque. I had once idea to check it, but still haven't.
×
×
  • Create New...