Jump to content

Balance staff remover: K&D 50


Recommended Posts

Hello,

I hope everyone is doing well.  I've been searching the market for a k&d balance staff remover tool to use with my staking set.  The K&D 50 type comes in different sizes depending on the gap between the goose neck of the staking set and its table (the gap on mine is 11/16 inch).  Reading the k&d instructions my staking set calls for a 3/4 inch k&d 50 tool.  I've not found a 3/4 on ebay.  I have found a 5/8 inch, so I'm wondering if the the 5/8 inch would work--that must depend on how far out the knob unscrews (and heightens) to fit tight inside the gap.  Or might the next size up work.   Does anyone know?  Thank you.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Graziano,

Thanks for taking the time.  i think i'm either having cognitive issues or my eyesight is getting way bad :), but the measurements i gave were not correct.  i used my digital calipers this time and a measurement of 27 mm or roughly 1 inch.  so according to the chart i would need a kd 50 model 3/4 inch or 7/8 inch.  i don't know where they get those measurements; is it from the top to bottom with the top screwed all the way down?    do you know which is your model; it's often times printed on the front of the original box if you have it.  would you mind measuring from the top to the bottom with the top screwed all the way down.  that way i'll have some base for comparison when shopping online.  have a nice day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Well, this thread solved a mystery for me.  I have posted about my Tri-Duty staking set before w/r to using it on a lathe.

I had noticed the staff-remover tool before, but knew it was to short to work on my other staking set.  No wonder...it is designed to fit this try-duty set.  It comes with the unique stakes that fit into the adjuster.

This is great!  I have done three staff replacements so far...with my other staking set.  This discovery should remove any error to the process.

2021-05-23 10_45_54-Photos.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I have this 50b in size 3/4 inch. I was wondering if the part A in the picture is same in all sizes and height of B varies or is the threaded part in A different height in every size option? I might want to get the K&D 50 for pocket watches too but the smaller sizes seem pretty rare. My Favorite has a clearance of 22,7 mm. It would help if I could just buy some wrong size and use the B I already have.

 

IMG_20221108_233242.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, praezis said:

A remark to all users and seekers:
This tool cannot avoid distorting and damaging of the hole when punching the staff out.

Frank

But for those of us home hobbyists without the space for a lathe, it is an acceptable option.

It's no different from using a Platax tool, as Mark demonstrates here : (5min)  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vIQvAm4GC5U&t=992s

From looking under the microscope, I haven't seen any noticeable distortion or damage. 

To quote "Fried" :

Lathe method :
"This method of removing riveted staffs is recognised as the safest and will not distort or damage the balance".

Staff Extractor :
"Some watchmakers use a staff extractor to remove riveted staffs. This method, though not as good as cutting off the hub, is better than just knocking out the staff without any support for the balance arms".
 

Edited by mikepilk
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, praezis said:

A remark to all users and seekers:
This tool cannot avoid distorting and damaging of the hole when punching the staff out.

Frank

Hiya Frank. Would you say this basically applies to all mthods of using a staking tool to remove the staff ? and best practice would be to cut away the rivet rather than break it out through the balance wheel hole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Hiya Frank. Would you say this basically applies to all mthods of using a staking tool to remove the staff ? and best practice would be to cut away the rivet rather than break it out through the balance wheel hole.

Yes!

That tool(s) avoid bending the balance spoke only, but do not prevent the hole from damage.
- by forcing the thicker, distorted part of the staff (from rivetting) through the hole
- by unsufficient support:

Unruhmax_supp.jpg.823c39b14d00711a1a4e9f24184c9dc6.jpg

The issue was already discussed here several times.

Frank

Edited by praezis
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kalle Slaap at Chronoglide doesn't use any support - just punches it out with a staking set 😯 (see from 4 min)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GRj8Eb97HJo&t=933s

And Ashton, at Precision Horology, says that the way he was trained at Rolex, was to push it out with a jewelling tool, again no support : (see from 6m 30sec)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8EtGKDg8Qs

If it's good enough for Rolex ....

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mikepilk said:

Kalle Slaap at Chronoglide doesn't use any support - just punches it out with a staking set 😯 (see from 4 min)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GRj8Eb97HJo&t=933s

And Ashton, at Precision Horology, says that the way he was trained at Rolex, was to push it out with a jewelling tool, again no support : (see from 6m 30sec)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8EtGKDg8Qs

If it's good enough for Rolex ....

 

 

My staking/jeweling class a couple of weekends ago was taught by a Rolex certified watchmaker.  Guess what?  He taught us to punch them out.  The few staff replacements that I have done...I have done it with the lathe and sans the lathe.  So... I dunno.  What I do next time will depend on my mood.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LittleWatchShop said:

My staking/jeweling class a couple of weekends ago was taught by a Rolex certified watchmaker.  Guess what?  He taught us to punch them out.  The few staff replacements that I have done...I have done it with the lathe and sans the lathe.  So... I dunno.  What I do next time will depend on my mood.

Was the balance arms supported when you punched them, or was it just free like in Kalle's vid ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mikepilk said:

Was the balance arms supported when you punched them, or was it just free like in Kalle's vid

Supported.  We used a tool which I do not have.  It was a punch with wings that had a punch inside.  You pressed the outer shell punch down to secure the balances arms and then you punched out the staff with the inner punch.  Not sure what that tool is called.  I do have the KD tool that fits on my staking set and I think I used it once or twice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

Not sure what that tool is called

It is the „Unruhmax“, probably German origin (my drawing showed part of it. 

Mr. Slaap is someone, I would never hand over a valuable watch for repair. It makes sense that his videos adress and are famous with amateurs.

Just today his videos were warmly recommended by 2 members in a German watch/clock repair forum that I attend frequently. I watched a video about chaging balance staffs, but was embarrassed after few minutes and quit.
Damaging balances is easy and no amateur will need a video to do this! 

Experienced fellow watchmakers‘ judgement was exactly the same.

Sorry,
Frank

Edited by praezis
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, praezis said:

It is the „Unruhmax“, probably German origin (my drawing showed part of it. 

Mr. Slaap is someone, I would never hand over a valuable watch for repair. It makes sense that his videos adress and are famous with amateurs.

Just today his videos were warmly recommended by 2 members in a German watch/clock repair forum that I attend frequently. I watched a video about chaging balance staffs, but was embarrassed after few minutes and quit.
Damaging balances is easy and no amateur will need a video to do this! 

Experienced fellow watchmakers‘ judgement was exactly the same.

Sorry,
Frank

Certain subjects should just not be broached 🙂

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, praezis said:

It is the „Unruhmax“, probably German origin (my drawing showed part of it. 

Mr. Slaap is someone, I would never hand over a valuable watch for repair. It makes sense that his videos adress and are famous with amateurs.

Just today his videos were warmly recommended by 2 members in a German watch/clock repair forum that I attend frequently. I watched a video about chaging balance staffs, but was embarrassed after few minutes and quit.
Damaging balances is easy and no amateur will need a video to do this! 

Experienced fellow watchmakers‘ judgement was exactly the same.

Sorry,
Frank

 

Screenshot_20221109-225622_eBay.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, praezis said:

Yes!

That tool(s) avoid bending the balance spoke only, but do not prevent the hole from damage.

I agree with @praezis that balance staff removal should only be attempted in a lathe. However, many/some other watchmakers who are also fairly well experienced are certain that punching out a balance staff while supporting the balance wheel is acceptable (at least if done only once), and will not distort the balance wheel hole. 
 

This debate over balance staff removal has continued for a very long time, and like choice of lubrication, is unlikely to ever end. People over at the NAWCC forum have even gone to the extent of measuring the size of the hole in the balance wheel AFTER the balance staff has been punched out. Proponents of removal punching out the balance staff have claimed that it is only improper punching out of the balance staff that distorts the hole. 
 

However, the flange of the rivet which secures the balance staff on the balance wheel still has to pass through the hole when the balance staff is punched out. While a single balance staff punched out once (done properly) should not distort the hole much, it’s much safer to remove the balance staff using a lathe.


This is similar to the question of whether to use  a reamer in a jeweling tool to enlarge a hole in the main plate: it’s far better to mount the main plate on a lathe and optically center the hole to be enlarged. This avoids hole drift, especially if the hole is in a part of the main plate of uneven thickness.

Edited by ifibrin
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, ifibrin said:

I agree with @praezis that balance staff removal should only be attempted in a lathe. However, many/some other watchmakers who are also fairly well experienced are certain that punching out a balance staff while supporting the balance wheel is acceptable (at least if done only once), and will not distort the balance wheel hole. 
 

This debate over balance staff removal has continued for a very long time, and like choice of lubrication, is unlikely to ever end. People over at the NAWCC forum have even gone to the extent of measuring the size of the hole in the balance wheel AFTER the balance staff has been punched out. Proponents of removal punching out the balance staff have claimed that it is only improper punching out of the balance staff that distorts the hole. 
 

However, the flange of the rivet which secures the balance staff on the balance wheel still has to pass through the hole when the balance staff is punched out. While a single balance staff punched out once (done properly) should not distort the hole much, it’s much safer to remove the balance staff using a lathe.


This is similar to the question of whether to use  a reamer in a jeweling tool to enlarge a hole in the main plate: it’s far better to mount the main plate on a lathe and optically center the hole to be enlarged. This avoids hole drift, especially if the hole is in a part of the main plate of uneven thickness.

I dont think anyone can disagree with that theory. Punching a folded rim of a hardened steel staff through a hole of a weaker or even an equivalent strength material must leave an element of damage/change to that hole. How much damage ? Thats going to vary on the skill and technique of the repairer, the thickness of the staff rivet being punched out and the varying strength's of the two materials being impacted. That being said that practice should still  continue to the best of the ability for those of us with no other option. Not everyone has the luxury of a lathe if they did then this discussion might not be here. ( apart from those of us that just like to argue 😅 )

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • 🤔 leaving the EU meant that UK was no longer part of the convention and have already been turned down an independent reapplication. I'm pretty sure courts have to be held in Switzerland in this case. There will be a lot more watches stashed away in draws  tbh, folk wont be able to afford to maintain them. Cheap watches will be bought and top end watches by folk with plenty of cash that can pay for service and repair. The expensive once in a lifetime gifts and everything else inbetween will be at the forgotton when they stop working. I know i was being a numpty, get used to it 😄 Anybody that knows will boycott them, but besides repairers who will know. Nope will never buy one, i made that decision as soon as i learnt about this. 
    • although not in this case.  It was the Lugano Convention and its deficiencies that allowed a Swiss court decision in the first place.  This isnt really a Brexit issue at all.  A decision that affects both the EU and the UK should never have been heard in Switzerland. I bet the authorised service centres in the UK are pretty pleased.  It's a massive shame, though; I believe watch owners should be able to choose to have their watch serviced by whoever they trust.
    • Hi guys I think that old hippy is correct, it opens the gates for china to manufacture aftermarket spare parts. considering that they already do work on behalf of the Swiss I guess this decision gives the a little more legitimacy to tool up and I am sure they will take advantage of the situation either with or without the blessing of the Swiss watch industry  Having read about the protectionist machinations of the Swiss in the history of Europe they were the only ones to get fat at everybody else’s expense. I think the outcome could have been guessed at but ,  fair play to Cousins UK for standing up to them.  Now the question,  will everybody boycott Swiss watches and Swatch, no way they will still fill their coffers.  Me I stick with the Japanese once renowned for cheap shitty watches who came good through industrial effort and don’t for get the Russians that most dismiss as low grade crap. Wouldn’t buy a swatch product ever how about you all.? a
×
×
  • Create New...