Jump to content

American Waltham


markr

Recommended Posts

This watch is running but week.  I'm assuming that it's a split stem front loader but before I go prying I would like to conform that.  Besides missing hands and crystal am I also missing a bezel?IMG_4595.thumb.JPG.acf4221d45ff22df57d434131081dc95.JPG

IMG_4594.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, no bezel.  And I would bet money it's a split stem.  Even though it's a lever set case, I don't see a lever protruding from the movement, so I'm guessing you have a crown-set cased in a lever-set case.  In which case (pardon the pun) you'll want to remember to pull out the crown to the set position before lifting out the movement.  Pocket Watch Database will give you a picture and tell you more.  Nice old Waltham you have!

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before popping the movement out remember to Either remove or rotate the case screws out of the way. Then it's very likely it hasn't been serviced in a very very long time probably service last time with organic oils which have hardened up more than likely a new mainspring and cleaning will possibly fix the problem.

Notice how I use the phrasing possibly fix the problem? Your watch is missing a few things who knows what else has been done to it. American pocket watches have suffered in the hands of people who didn't always grasp what they were doing and it makes for challenging repairs at times. So simple cleaning is may not fix the problem. If you're lucky maybe no one's actually touched the movement since it was manufactured then cleaning should fix the problem and new mainspring.

What's interesting the pocket watch database that was mentioned above found that the link below doesn't have the parts list for your watch? The parts listings are out there it just means that they haven't got them listed yet hopefully.

https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/waltham/6176367

 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

John makes a good point; who knows what people have been doing to it over the span of decades.  I'm sure when you strip it down for cleaning you'll be going over the parts with a fine-toothed comb.  Goodness knows I've seen tool marks of wide variety, from repairmen with too-large screwdrivers and a handful of thumbs, and I've seen (and smelled) movements that were sprayed full of WD-40, Cosmoline, gun oil, and some kids of oil I could not identify but may have been akin to lamp oil maybe.  And I have found all manner of filth anf grit in some of them too.  This Waltham has been around a while so there's been time.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A nice watch! Replacement hands are easy to come by, as are replacement crystals.

Bezels are a different story. You might contact Don Barrett at City Bank Antiques in Ohio. He has a good reputation among NAWCC members for his epic stash of hunter case bezels. (He would also replace the crystal if you wished, which is probably worth it.)

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've seen some really nice early 20th century pieces where all the jewels, including center wheel, were convex. Definitely to reduce friction. It can be quite hard to tell if a jewel has olive holes, especially on small sizes, but that again reduces friction- as well as accommodates small misalignments better. Why they aren't used more often? I imagine it was found that at a certain point in the train the actual advantage became negligible, and the added cost on high production movements is why it's not seen on those, just higher-end pieces.   I did an experiment on a little 5x7"' AS 1012 a few years back. These things run OK sometimes, but often are absolute dogs. And AS made gajillions of them. I had a NOS novelty watch in for a service, ran OK flat, massive drop in amplitude vertical. Made like 3 staffs for it trying different pivot sizes, no change. Tried high quality (not Seitz) convex/olive jewels, no change- the original were flat, but could have been olive hole. Same for the pallet fork, then escape wheel, no change. Probably had 20 hours in the watch, new staff and new hole jewels through the escape wheel, no difference in running. Just a dog of a movement. But if I were making a watch I would use them, just because.
    • When Nicklesilver mentioned the use of them on non coned pivots on older high end watches closer to the escapement.  That suggested to me  probably fourth wheels and possibly third wheels. The square shoulder rotatating on the much smaller surface area of a dome as opposed to a flat jewel surface. I'm curious as to why they are not used predominantly?
    • That's what I thought, but as I said, it makes sense. See if any of our pros will have something to add.
    • Kind of guessing here watchie with a bit of logic.
    • Canon with FE 4612a movement. Day and Date display Trying something new. Although is will take some time for me to start, I have a back injury that is very painful and so cannot concentrate. Set myself a target to begin mid May. Purchased a Canon wrist watch with  FE 4612a movement. Advertised with Rotor missing. Arrived, took photographs. Strap broken, removed and place in bin. Back removed. No rotor. Wind is stiff. Can wind up. Everything moves ok. Oscillates for under a minute, then stops. No rotor but all wheels appear the be there. Have sent for a donor movement FE4612. No day wheel.  I have taken basic photographs up to the point of service commencement. I will try a new format and use the record system on the microscope to show the full disassembly subsequent assembly. I will photograph the cleaning process.  Whilst I have no intention beginning a YouTube channel, I would like to begin to make a better record of my work standard. Work to do.  Make case to a better standard. Repair crystal. Replace strap.  Only a thought. I will try to insert an English day wheel. Not sure if it can be done, but hey, what can I lose. Got to stop now, back so sore.
×
×
  • Create New...