Jump to content

A couple of new projects..... Any info welcome!?


Recommended Posts

Decided to take a quick look at a couple of new project watches that I picked up last week from an aquaintance, just wondering if anyone is familiar with them and can point me to any resources that may help with the planned service / repair:

This one marked as Corteberts 592 R:

62941056-F416-4AD4-B97C-08C674D433DB.thumb.jpeg.5fa41b9834ff9f2e88ece8ef855fdae7.jpeg

6B0687F6-AB67-41D1-8A89-0292AB98ED8C.thumb.jpeg.b3baf61f860e600946451703431a6b40.jpeg

This one looks Russian, marked 18KAMHEN 3602:

1376CADD-2E6A-46E7-9F07-165884FBD954.thumb.jpeg.0a10f97988c3bd730870067477df10aa.jpeg

769A7A7D-5995-47D1-AF06-86EA58BCED00.thumb.jpeg.45b2cf4bc4ceaf7cae47bb2c0420266a.jpeg

This one I am told is trench watch, no initial markings but what looks like an interesting hacking mechanism?:

8A82BF74-AAAA-4F99-8EAA-F059CB3F1358.thumb.jpeg.69572486a531a2371431c77cd0513d8f.jpeg

ADE05614-14CE-4D3D-B259-02CEEEEB80F5.thumb.jpeg.1da065ae5ea43a8f2556ab5326c70ad9.jpeg

 

Edited by Robbie010
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think any of those qualify as trench watches. They were typically small pocket watches with wire lugs soldered on. An interesting movement in that last one. Once you get into it, I'd be interested to see if there is any means of returning the second hand to 0. Jeweled pin lever movements aren't the norm either. Definitely interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cortebert is a good quality swiss, well worth fixing/ service and a good keeper.

The second one is Russian malnija, a copy of cortebert, rumour has it Russians hired former cortebert watchmakers to build malnija. Pivots polish themselves when used a lot but the piece wouldn't qualify as a watch in my book.

Third one ain't worth winding, in my book. 

Regs 

Joe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, spectre6000 said:

I don't think any of those qualify as trench watches. They were typically small pocket watches with wire lugs soldered on. An interesting movement in that last one. Once you get into it, I'd be interested to see if there is any means of returning the second hand to 0. Jeweled pin lever movements aren't the norm either. Definitely interesting.

I’ve removed the wristwatch from its case, the first thing that strikes me is a very strange balance wheel / pallet fork setup. The pallet fork I have never seen before, I did a quick sketch:

E176701F-D224-4C00-B5FE-F86BAB7FE1AA.thumb.jpeg.152130a6b31e00a29db1b6105bf3e2ed.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought I saw some extra pallet fork in there, but obviously hard to tell from the photo. 

So if you want to use the tachymeter, you have to wait for the second hand to reach 0, then stop it, hope whatever artillery didn't need to be fired in that time, then fire/start and stop again? That seems more decorative than useful... 

Wait... Looking again, is there even any sort of detent to keep the balance hacked between button pushes, or does it only stop while the pusher is pressed?

Edited by spectre6000
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@WatchMaker is right, it looks as though the hack is spring loaded and just stops the watch when the pusher is pressed. So is this a first world trench watch then? I wondered what the dial markings were for. 

Anyhow, I did a little more teardown this morning, very strange looking pallet fork and no impulse pin or jewel on the balance, just a piece of metal:

FDF0785C-629B-436D-9282-F408FD4A24D0.jpeg

1E3A0CA4-A599-4DF9-B600-91EAA128EDE5.jpeg

9E7A682C-F5F6-432C-9ADD-F0E3AECFB3A3.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only markings on the movement are a number 5 stamped on the main plate and number 3 stamped on the bridge plate. There are some faint marking inside the case back which I’ll try and get a better look at after its been through the sonic cleaner but the outer case back is well worn....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/6/2021 at 12:17 PM, watchweasol said:

A super sturdy movement, If they were military issue there would usually be the arrow mark an the case back along with a serial number.

The outer watch case back looks as though it may have had some markings but they are long since worn away. However, the inside of the watch case back has a few markings which look hand inscribed rather than stamped. They are:

addio ABABA

N94P8/43

189168

SJN + JHN

Do these mean anything to anyone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/6/2021 at 12:09 PM, Robbie010 said:

So is this a first world trench watch then?

Hi @Robbie010. No. This looks like a watch from the 1950s. Lapanouse had a brand called Rego which I've mentioned above. In the 1950s the Cimier brand came into being from this manufacturer. Could the 'CIR' logo on the dial be shorthand for Cimier? I don't know but irrespective of that it looks too similar to the range of inexpensive pin lever escapement watches produced in the 50's by this brand or similar.

Look for instance at the 'Telemetre' watches halfway down this page: http://www.mcbroom.biz/forum/read.php?5,2931 .

Such watches were made to look like more expensive proper chronographs but, as you've found, could simply have a 'balance stop' mechanism and no reset to zero. Doesn't mean it's a watch you shouldn't like though! Hope you get it going.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I recognize myself all too well. It takes a lot of experience and discipline to recognize when it's time to cancel and come back at a later time. Very well said! We should have a forum dedicated to this topic as it is critical to achieve success when working on watches. It's a lot more important than most other things related to watch repair. And yes, just a short break can make a world of difference!
    • Hello Wai and welcome to the forum. A little information to enlighten you a little more TZIllustratedGlossary.pdf
    • I am certainly not the first one who happen to ruin the chronograph center-wheel of a Seiko 6139B. The internet, when you search for it, is littered with stories, even here on WRT there are some. One of the problems is that the service manual of the 6139A is readily available on the net, not so with the service manual of the 6139B. On top, reading other forums & stories, there are people who claim that there is hardly any difference between the 6139A and the 6139B movement, so the 6139A service manual will suffice. However, one of the crucial differences is the design of the chronograph center-wheel. Also the Seiko reference numbers are different. For the 6139A, the reference number for the chronograph center-wheel is 888610 and for the 6139B: 888611 or 888612, depending on which manual you are reading (and perhaps there is a difference between these two wheel too !??) To lubricated the 6139A chronograph center-wheel, the following graphic picture in the 6139A service manual is given; One has to press down the sprocket and oil it. Unaware of the difference in chrono center-wheel design, I pressed down on the sprocket, but there was no movement. Perhaps not understanding or interpreting the drawing correctly, I pressed with the tweezers on the 4th wheel. This caused the 4th wheel, which turned out to be a press fit to the sprocket by the 6139B, to strip off the sprocket. Thereby me joining the line of all the others, who tried this before and are now searching for "how to fix" this misfortune. In an older thread on WRT, member @ricardopalamino place a picture in which he shows the difference in center-wheel design between the 6139A and the 6139B. To the left the 6139B and to the right the 6139A. As can be seen on the left center-wheel, the 4th wheel is pressed onto a sprocket. Pressing down on it, as shown in the 6139A service manual, gives a ruinous result. People did several attempts to repair the damage, but so far, I haven't found a success story. Here is one of the attempts; Reading what already has been tried, I tried a different approach ..... but sadly failed too. Nevertheless, I'll show what I've done; perhaps somebody may fine-tune or expand on the idea and has success? In my staking set was an anvil with a 4.5mm hole, exact the size needed to fit the chrono center-wheel "up-side-down". The distance between the clutch parts and the 4th wheel was 0.25mm. To support the 4th wheel as close as possible up to its center, I used feeler gauge blades, on one side a 0.25mm blade, and on the other side a combination of 0.15mm + 0.10mm blades. This allowed me to tap the sprocket back onto the 4th wheel ...... The thickness of 0.25 blades doesn't prevent some "spring" action, and so my 4th wheel was slightly deformed. The re-attachment seemed successful, but when trying to true the wheel, the connection failed again 😭 Currently there is a NOS 6139B chronograph center-wheel on eBay. Last Sunday the price was €150, on Monday the seller increased the price to €165 !!         Prevention is better than the cure and I do hope that anyone in the future, searching for a 6139 manual, with read my "Warning". As for my Seiko, I'm not going to invest €165 for one part and since the rest is pretty good, I will sell the watch for "parts or repair" 😞  
    • Off the top of my head I can't remember which was which, but one of the hands had the clutch with the very fine radial teeth as described above, the other had a flat disc with two tiny 'pins', there was what looked like the remains of something black smeared on the opposite face, maybe the remains of rotted rubber? When I can get some good pictures of both I will post
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
×
×
  • Create New...