Jump to content

A couple of new projects..... Any info welcome!?


Recommended Posts

Decided to take a quick look at a couple of new project watches that I picked up last week from an aquaintance, just wondering if anyone is familiar with them and can point me to any resources that may help with the planned service / repair:

This one marked as Corteberts 592 R:

62941056-F416-4AD4-B97C-08C674D433DB.thumb.jpeg.5fa41b9834ff9f2e88ece8ef855fdae7.jpeg

6B0687F6-AB67-41D1-8A89-0292AB98ED8C.thumb.jpeg.b3baf61f860e600946451703431a6b40.jpeg

This one looks Russian, marked 18KAMHEN 3602:

1376CADD-2E6A-46E7-9F07-165884FBD954.thumb.jpeg.0a10f97988c3bd730870067477df10aa.jpeg

769A7A7D-5995-47D1-AF06-86EA58BCED00.thumb.jpeg.45b2cf4bc4ceaf7cae47bb2c0420266a.jpeg

This one I am told is trench watch, no initial markings but what looks like an interesting hacking mechanism?:

8A82BF74-AAAA-4F99-8EAA-F059CB3F1358.thumb.jpeg.69572486a531a2371431c77cd0513d8f.jpeg

ADE05614-14CE-4D3D-B259-02CEEEEB80F5.thumb.jpeg.1da065ae5ea43a8f2556ab5326c70ad9.jpeg

 

Edited by Robbie010
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think any of those qualify as trench watches. They were typically small pocket watches with wire lugs soldered on. An interesting movement in that last one. Once you get into it, I'd be interested to see if there is any means of returning the second hand to 0. Jeweled pin lever movements aren't the norm either. Definitely interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cortebert is a good quality swiss, well worth fixing/ service and a good keeper.

The second one is Russian malnija, a copy of cortebert, rumour has it Russians hired former cortebert watchmakers to build malnija. Pivots polish themselves when used a lot but the piece wouldn't qualify as a watch in my book.

Third one ain't worth winding, in my book. 

Regs 

Joe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, spectre6000 said:

I don't think any of those qualify as trench watches. They were typically small pocket watches with wire lugs soldered on. An interesting movement in that last one. Once you get into it, I'd be interested to see if there is any means of returning the second hand to 0. Jeweled pin lever movements aren't the norm either. Definitely interesting.

I’ve removed the wristwatch from its case, the first thing that strikes me is a very strange balance wheel / pallet fork setup. The pallet fork I have never seen before, I did a quick sketch:

E176701F-D224-4C00-B5FE-F86BAB7FE1AA.thumb.jpeg.152130a6b31e00a29db1b6105bf3e2ed.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought I saw some extra pallet fork in there, but obviously hard to tell from the photo. 

So if you want to use the tachymeter, you have to wait for the second hand to reach 0, then stop it, hope whatever artillery didn't need to be fired in that time, then fire/start and stop again? That seems more decorative than useful... 

Wait... Looking again, is there even any sort of detent to keep the balance hacked between button pushes, or does it only stop while the pusher is pressed?

Edited by spectre6000
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@WatchMaker is right, it looks as though the hack is spring loaded and just stops the watch when the pusher is pressed. So is this a first world trench watch then? I wondered what the dial markings were for. 

Anyhow, I did a little more teardown this morning, very strange looking pallet fork and no impulse pin or jewel on the balance, just a piece of metal:

FDF0785C-629B-436D-9282-F408FD4A24D0.jpeg

1E3A0CA4-A599-4DF9-B600-91EAA128EDE5.jpeg

9E7A682C-F5F6-432C-9ADD-F0E3AECFB3A3.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only markings on the movement are a number 5 stamped on the main plate and number 3 stamped on the bridge plate. There are some faint marking inside the case back which I’ll try and get a better look at after its been through the sonic cleaner but the outer case back is well worn....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/6/2021 at 12:17 PM, watchweasol said:

A super sturdy movement, If they were military issue there would usually be the arrow mark an the case back along with a serial number.

The outer watch case back looks as though it may have had some markings but they are long since worn away. However, the inside of the watch case back has a few markings which look hand inscribed rather than stamped. They are:

addio ABABA

N94P8/43

189168

SJN + JHN

Do these mean anything to anyone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/6/2021 at 12:09 PM, Robbie010 said:

So is this a first world trench watch then?

Hi @Robbie010. No. This looks like a watch from the 1950s. Lapanouse had a brand called Rego which I've mentioned above. In the 1950s the Cimier brand came into being from this manufacturer. Could the 'CIR' logo on the dial be shorthand for Cimier? I don't know but irrespective of that it looks too similar to the range of inexpensive pin lever escapement watches produced in the 50's by this brand or similar.

Look for instance at the 'Telemetre' watches halfway down this page: http://www.mcbroom.biz/forum/read.php?5,2931 .

Such watches were made to look like more expensive proper chronographs but, as you've found, could simply have a 'balance stop' mechanism and no reset to zero. Doesn't mean it's a watch you shouldn't like though! Hope you get it going.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
×
×
  • Create New...