Jump to content

Jaeger-LeCoultre 497 amplitude drop


Jakub

Recommended Posts

Good day!

Today I finished service of LeCoultre Futurematic. Once I’ve put movement together and let it run for while, it was about weishi time. Soon enough I’ve noticed new issue for me. 
There is significant amplitude drop between horizontal and vertical positions, but different horizontal and vertical positions have very close results. Same issue causes this movement to slow down. 
I don’t realize it would do before service, since the amplitude was in general low, so I didn’t pay attention to it (my bad). After I’ve found this, cleaned train, check end shake and hair spring.
Do anyone has this happened to them? Please let me know if there is something to be done. I feel I’m pretty close with getting this one right.

Cheers 

Jakub

C1CEE026-5714-40A5-94E2-16EC54D53B76.jpeg

1C4E2D6F-11E1-4290-B5EB-95BCB5DF60DE.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

About a 40 degree drop from horizontal to vertical would be normal for many vintage pieces with relatively heavy balances and slow (18,000bph) trains. It's a matter of pivot size to balance inertia. You aren't too far off, and some older Lecoultre stuff is especially bad here- their smaller calibers can have a 70 degree drop in some cases. I've noticed that the escapement locks are often quite heavy on old Lecoultre calibers, and reducing that can help quite a lot. First of all it will boost the overall amplitude, but by reducing the lock you reduce the force needed to unlock, and this is especially helpful in the vertical positions where the balance is already dealing with increased friction.

 

As it is, have a look at the regulator pins; they should be very close, but with the spring bouncing evenly between them. About 2 hairspring thicknesses would be a max gap (so 1 thickness of freedom). If you can close them a little it will already improve the difference between H and V rates.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

As it is, have a look at the regulator pins; they should be very close, but with the spring bouncing evenly between them. About 2 hairspring thicknesses would be a max gap (so 1 thickness of freedom).

I can’t make picture clear enough, but you can take my word it is pretty much as you write. 

2 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

I've noticed that the escapement locks are often quite heavy on old Lecoultre calibers, and reducing that can help quite a lot. First of all it will boost the overall amplitude, but by reducing the lock you reduce the force needed to unlock, and this is especially helpful in the vertical positions where the balance is already dealing with increased friction.

Here I am very interested. I would love to explore this further, but I guess on cheaper caliber. I have some suitable CCCR watches with heavy locks. Correct me if I’m wrong, do I better own poising tool before this experiment?

Thank you for answer. I am happy to hear watch is actually behaving OK. On other side I have to resolve -26s/d. In this case I will regulate watch to V positions since there is more of them ?

Cheers

Jakub

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you aren't experienced in adjusting escapements then definitely learn on something cheaper. There aren't too many Futurematics out there! I wouldn't recommend getting into poising on this one either. You will want to check it in 6 positions, 4 vertical and the 2 horizontal. An overall delta of 30 seconds would be normal for this watch. If you can set the machine to a time "window" where it averages over a set length of time, set it to 20 seconds. When moving to a new position give it 20-30 seconds to settle in, then take a reading. Take the average over the 6 and regulate to be about 5s fast per day.

 

Also, as you just finished it, you will likely find that it picks up some amplitude over the next few days. Not all watches do, but it happens quite often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m not experienced in adjusting balances, tho I went over some materials about it. I won’t do such a move on such a watch. For now I am happy with results on movement and power reserve. Poising tool is on the list and I have bunch of Soviet whole balances that I use for such a experiments.

I’ve noticed before increased amplitude. I assume it’s for better lubricant distribution. I expect “tick” and “tock” lines to be more parallel in next 24 hours.

Overall this 497, interesting experience. Specially unwind mainspring ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • in general this shouldn't be any change. but in general questions like this it be nice to know the specifics of the watch in other words how was it performing before it was cased up and what is it doing now.
    • just as a reminder this watch is a Swatch group product. This will bring up a problem like spare parts and technical information. that I found some links to some information on when I talk about your watch and some of the technical and basically your watch is equivalent to 2834-2 for which I'm attaching the technical sheets. But equivalent does not mean exactly the same you want to do a search on the group for C07 as we discussed this watch before including the technical differences how it's supposed to be regulated and basically because it's watch group there is no parts availability. https://calibercorner.com/eta-caliber-c07-xxx/   https://www.chrono24.com/magazine/eta-movements-from-the-2824-2-to-the-powermatic-80-p_80840/ https://www.watchuseek.com/threads/h-10-movement-details.4636991/ eta CT_2834-2_FDE_481857_15.pdf
    • people be honest.... Swatch is evil for the watchmakers and repairers, BUT not everything in watches from Switzerland is from the Swatch-Group. As far as i know, Selitta got sacked by Swatch as a Movement-Assembler for them and they started to produce Movements in their own Name with slight Modifications. As far as i know, they sell Parts to the Market for their Movements. In most cases, if a ETA-Movement fails, it is a valid Option to replace it with a Selitta Movement, which i consider the Solution for this Mess with the Swatch-Group...... I have no Connection to anybody at Selitta, but being a Swiss-Guy, i still like to have Swiss-Made Watches, but not from the Swatch-Group.   ok ? regards, Ernst
    • Just one more greedy act by Swatch. They started a number of years ago here in the US..cutting off supplies to watchmakers that could build complications that many Swatch houses couldn't even touch. Old school masters who had gone through some of the most prestigious houses in the world. Otto Frei has some statements on their page about it. I tell all my customers to avoid new Swiss watches like the plague,..unless they just want an older one in their collection that still has some parts out on the market, or they have really deep pockets and don't mind waiting months and paying through the nose to get it back. Plenty of others to choose from..IE Seiko,..or other non-swiss brands Even a number of Chinese brands are catching up with the Swiss,..and I think that in time, their actions will be their downfall
    • Yes. If that's not what you are experiencing...start looking for something rubbing. A 1st guess is that one of the hands is rubbing against the hole in the center of the dial. Especially if you now have lower amplitude in face up/ face down positions.
×
×
  • Create New...