Jump to content

Jaeger-LeCoultre 497 amplitude drop


Jakub

Recommended Posts

Good day!

Today I finished service of LeCoultre Futurematic. Once I’ve put movement together and let it run for while, it was about weishi time. Soon enough I’ve noticed new issue for me. 
There is significant amplitude drop between horizontal and vertical positions, but different horizontal and vertical positions have very close results. Same issue causes this movement to slow down. 
I don’t realize it would do before service, since the amplitude was in general low, so I didn’t pay attention to it (my bad). After I’ve found this, cleaned train, check end shake and hair spring.
Do anyone has this happened to them? Please let me know if there is something to be done. I feel I’m pretty close with getting this one right.

Cheers 

Jakub

C1CEE026-5714-40A5-94E2-16EC54D53B76.jpeg

1C4E2D6F-11E1-4290-B5EB-95BCB5DF60DE.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

About a 40 degree drop from horizontal to vertical would be normal for many vintage pieces with relatively heavy balances and slow (18,000bph) trains. It's a matter of pivot size to balance inertia. You aren't too far off, and some older Lecoultre stuff is especially bad here- their smaller calibers can have a 70 degree drop in some cases. I've noticed that the escapement locks are often quite heavy on old Lecoultre calibers, and reducing that can help quite a lot. First of all it will boost the overall amplitude, but by reducing the lock you reduce the force needed to unlock, and this is especially helpful in the vertical positions where the balance is already dealing with increased friction.

 

As it is, have a look at the regulator pins; they should be very close, but with the spring bouncing evenly between them. About 2 hairspring thicknesses would be a max gap (so 1 thickness of freedom). If you can close them a little it will already improve the difference between H and V rates.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

As it is, have a look at the regulator pins; they should be very close, but with the spring bouncing evenly between them. About 2 hairspring thicknesses would be a max gap (so 1 thickness of freedom).

I can’t make picture clear enough, but you can take my word it is pretty much as you write. 

2 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

I've noticed that the escapement locks are often quite heavy on old Lecoultre calibers, and reducing that can help quite a lot. First of all it will boost the overall amplitude, but by reducing the lock you reduce the force needed to unlock, and this is especially helpful in the vertical positions where the balance is already dealing with increased friction.

Here I am very interested. I would love to explore this further, but I guess on cheaper caliber. I have some suitable CCCR watches with heavy locks. Correct me if I’m wrong, do I better own poising tool before this experiment?

Thank you for answer. I am happy to hear watch is actually behaving OK. On other side I have to resolve -26s/d. In this case I will regulate watch to V positions since there is more of them ?

Cheers

Jakub

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you aren't experienced in adjusting escapements then definitely learn on something cheaper. There aren't too many Futurematics out there! I wouldn't recommend getting into poising on this one either. You will want to check it in 6 positions, 4 vertical and the 2 horizontal. An overall delta of 30 seconds would be normal for this watch. If you can set the machine to a time "window" where it averages over a set length of time, set it to 20 seconds. When moving to a new position give it 20-30 seconds to settle in, then take a reading. Take the average over the 6 and regulate to be about 5s fast per day.

 

Also, as you just finished it, you will likely find that it picks up some amplitude over the next few days. Not all watches do, but it happens quite often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m not experienced in adjusting balances, tho I went over some materials about it. I won’t do such a move on such a watch. For now I am happy with results on movement and power reserve. Poising tool is on the list and I have bunch of Soviet whole balances that I use for such a experiments.

I’ve noticed before increased amplitude. I assume it’s for better lubricant distribution. I expect “tick” and “tock” lines to be more parallel in next 24 hours.

Overall this 497, interesting experience. Specially unwind mainspring ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think if you want to play Billy big b.ollocks then you have to have something up your sleeve, anyone that knows how to fight, plays dirty. Lets face it a lot of folk that voted for Brexit just rolled uk their sleeves to say up yours EU hoping for good changes. We have idiots for leaders and probably none of them clever enough to clean the shitty stick they were given. I didnt vote, what will be will be.
    • I voted leave too, my reasoning was the the EU is undemocratic, no elected officials. I don't regret it but I  am sad that both sides acted like petulant toddlers.  Shameful.  I'm not on other forums but if I was and left this site, would you shun me? Of course not, we aren't petulant toddlers.  
    • This is a type of tool that may be suitable to remove the bezel - though note that I'm pretty sure the watch should be face down - not face up, as in some of the photos of these tools on amazon & ebay! If you try one one of those, put the movement screws back in first to avoid accidents. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Removal-Professional-Remover-Watchmaker-Diameter/dp/B09XCH4QVN?source=ps-sl-shoppingads-lpcontext&ref_=fplfs&smid=A296NCMMFVXSDN&th=1  
    • Hi, I’m constantly asking my wife to help me with removing the stem in order to complete casing. To expand, this is not a challenge for me when the setting lever is secured by a screw (older calibers). However when the setting lever is attached to a spring loaded setting lever axel, like on more modern calibers, I simply don’t see how to apply enough pressure on the button to get the stem out short of putting the movement face down with the dial and hands attached, which I’m loath to do in order to avoid damaging the dial/hands? what technique should I be using? thanks  
    • Many thanks for your advice (being borne in mind at present) & offer Dell. When I was given the clock the plastic anchor was loose on the arbour (it had split at the 'hole') &, after repairing this, I have been trying to determine whether the spindle (pin) should be perpendicular when the pallet is sitting on a flat surface; or whether, when installed, its L-R extremes (or alternatively its tick & tock points) should lie at equal angles from the vertical when moved with spring absent. I can get the clock to run but in every such configuration the top block has to be turned anti-clockwise (from above) by quite a bit in order to be 'in beat' & it always runs fast (despite the pendulum being set to as slow as possible). This makes me wonder if there is any particular feature of/fault in a torsion spring clock which determines which turn direction (if any) is necessary to get it 'in beat'; & whether there would be a different set of settings that would get it running nearer to time at somewhere around the mid timing/inertia position which would then allow tweaking of the fast/slow setting.
×
×
  • Create New...