Jump to content

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Klassiker said:

That's the first time I've seen a toothed drive belt in use. Do you have toothed pulleys too?

No teeth on drive, or headstock.  Just friction.  As I recall...my dad had a leather belt installed back in the day.  Not sure what caused the transition.  It is a very nice belt and will never break--pretty sure of that.

It is quiet.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LittleWatchShop said:

will never break-

You can be very sure of that! The concern I would have with a toothed belt is, they have no stretch in them, like a drive chain. You have a relatively small area of adjustment, outside of which there is either too little tension (slipping) or too much (radial load on the bearings). But If it works for you, then fine!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have the same tension on either a round leather belt or the toothed V-belt, no more radial load will be exerted on the bearings.

Due to contact area of the V-belt versus a round belt, you will get more power transferred to the lathe before the belt slips under load.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watchmakers are interesting people we adapt and use things from a variety of sources.

One popular method of belts is something that  can be fused together. heat up the ends push them together clean up the access and I never like that as it is really hard to do. But it was popularly sold because you can have any size you want.

Then somebody discovered sewing machine belts. Exactly what's being discussed here the perfect solution other than you have to disassemble lathe to put them on. Even though supposedly they don't scratch they do stretch enough to hold nice and tight they do work really well. About the only downfall that I noticed if you don't use your lathe on a regular basis to keep the belt under tension it stretches. But I doubt you're ever going to see that under normal use.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

I will get a feel for this over time and adjust accordingly

With your set-up you can adjust the tension then clamp everything down so it doesn't move. "Slipping with some amount of resistance" is probably about right. That's an engine timing belt, so it won't stretch, ever. it might wear though, or it might wear your pulleys. If you want to run on one of those smaller pulleys you will have to readjust for tension and alignment. The Singer v-belt might be the better option, but you have to dismantle everything again to try it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting debate my take is the there is no real need for a toothed belt with a watchmakers lathe because of the small cuts made. My worry would be if there was a mishap/jam the smooth belt would slip but a toothed belt would till try to carry on turning the lathe. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would agree if it was using a toothed pulley then yes,  but some toothed belts are "V" belts toothed for easier curvature around pulleys but the "V"pulley is smooth so slippage occurs.  There was some Large printers I worked on that had both types driving the print barrel,  solid brass with a beryillium coating so the hammers did not flatten the characters..    600 Lpm and 300Lpm.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

5 hours ago, clockboy said:

My worry would be if there was a mishap/jam the smooth belt would slip but a toothed belt would till try to carry on turning the lathe. 

My only experience with watchmakers lathe belts before the sewing machine belt was round and smooth. I don't recall ever having a problem with round and smooth because there's always tension on the belt. Yes if you're trying to make a really aggressive cut it will probably slip but watchmakers lathes aren't really meant to be machining heavy cuts. Then there's the shape of the pulley on the lathe they seem to be designed for a round.

The link below shows lathe belting material and it's all round. Farther down the page some of its textured.

https://www.cousinsuk.com/product/lathe-belting-also-for-rota-barrel-drums?code=L58234

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have round section pulleys, you should use round belt material. If you have V section pulleys, you should use a v-belt.

It should be remembered though that a v-belt only contacts the pulley on its sides. The inner face of the belt should not be running on the bottom surface of the V on the pulleys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Klassiker said:

Well, the convention on watchmaking lathes is to use a round belt in a v-groove, hence my original question to LittleWatchShop.

Correct. The material used is soft and will adapt itself to the shape of the pulley grove, and elastic enough to deal with some elongation. That is, self adjusting for tension. 

Very different from bigger belt machines. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I picked up another lathe...just because I guess.  I did not have a motor nor tail stock.  I scavenged a motor from an old sewing machine I had in the queue for the dump (whew, glad I woke up regarding that).

I needed a belt.  Imagine that.  After trying a leather shoe lace I did some research and found that some people use PU (polyurethane) belts and melt them together to form a continuous loop.

I do not have any PU, however, I have 3mm TPU (Thermoplastic Polyurethane) used for 3D printing.  Voila!  Seems to be working just fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OK, welcome in the world of alarm clocks... I guess the 4th wheel is dished because it is from another movement. If it was not dishet, then it would not mesh with the pinion of the escape wheel, am I right? The marks of wear on the 4th wheel pinion doesn't corespond to the 3th wheel table position, at list this is what i see on the picts. Calculating the rate is easy - there is a formula - BR = T2 x T3 x T4 x T5 x 2 /(P3 x P4 x P5) where T2 - T5 are the counts of the teeth of the wheels tables, and P3 - P5 are the counts of the pinion leaves. Vibrating the balance is easy - grasp for the hairspring where it should stay in the regulator with tweasers, let the balance hang on the hairspring while the downside staff tip rests on glass surface. Then make the balance oscillate and use timer to measure the time for let say 50 oscillations, or count the oscillations for let say 30 seconds. You must do the free oscillations test to check the balance staff tips and the cone cup bearings for wear. This kind of staffs wear and need resharpening to restore the normal function of the balance.
    • Glue a nut to the barrel lid, insert a bolt, pull, disolve the glue.  Maybe someone will have a better answer. 
    • The stress is the force (on the spring) x distance. The maximum stress is at the bottom, and decreases up the arm. That's why they always break at the bottom. I used a round file, then something like 2000 grit to finish. I gave the rest of the arm a quick polish - no need for a perfect finish. Just make sure there are no 'notches' left from cutting/filing. The notches act like the perforations in your toilet paper 🤣
    • It's probably a cardinal rule for watch repair to never get distracted while at the bench. Yesterday, after finishing a tricky mainspring winding/barrel insertion (I didn't have a winder and arbor that fit very well) I mentally shifted down a gear once that hurdle was passed. There were other things going on in the room as I put the barrel and cover into the barrel closer and pressed to get that satisfying snap. But when I took it out I realized I never placed the arbor.  When opening a barrel, we are relying on the arbor to transfer a concentrically-distributed force right where it is needed at the internal center of the lid. However, when that isn't present it's difficult to apply pressure or get leverage considering the recessed position of the lid, the small holes in the barrel and the presence of the mainspring coils. It was a beat-up practice movement so I didn't take a lot of time to think it over and I pushed it out using a short right-angle dental probe placed in from the bottom, but that did leave a bit of a scratch and crease in the thin lid. I had also thought about pulling it using a course-threaded screw with a minor thread diameter smaller than the lid hole and a major diameter larger, but that may have done some damage as well.  Thinking about how this might have been handled had it been a more valuable movement, is there a method using watchmaking or other tools that should extract the lid with the least damage? 
    • 🤔 what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ? Making a small groove so the lubrication doesn't spread across the component but what if when lubing a little overspills and sits on the epilame .
×
×
  • Create New...