Jump to content

If an 18000 balance complete were installed instead of the intended 19800 ? ... (Seiko 6216A)


Rory

Recommended Posts

So, I’ve just received a lovely 6216-9000 to get back in shape ... symptom reported by previous owner (flipper, with no knowledge of its service history) was of losing something like 5 min per hour (!).

However, I thought I’d lucked out when I popped it on the timegrapher - good accuracy (after minor dialling in), decent beat - but noticed that it was auto-detecting at 18000. The 6216A movement is supposed to run at 19800.  I manually set to 19800 and the grapher wouldn’t even provide a reading.

Observing the dial over the space of 5 minutes confirmed the movement is losing a ton of time, as reported by the previous owner.

So, this got me wondering ... if somewhere in this watch’s history someone replaced the balance complete with one from one of it’s 18000 rated cousins (in the 62 movement series) ... wouldn’t that be a prime contender for the cause of the very poor performance?  I’m mid teardown so other issues may present themselves, but the auto detect on my Wishi 1900 got me wondering, so wanted to get your view on this.

Cheers - Rory

Note on 62 series : https://www.watch-wiki.net/index.php?title=Seiko_6200

65949D30-B9BD-4BF0-B52A-C397128B07C1.jpeg

3C1D086C-A3BB-48D1-BAA6-2BC424FD6322.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The difference between 19800 and 18000 is 1800 beats per hour. That is the difference of 360 seconds or -6 minutes an hour (based on a 18000bph standard) or about -5 minutes 25-30 seconds (based on a 19800bph standard). So you theory that the wrong balance complete was used is very likely. I suspect if a 19800 balance complete was installed you issue would resolve. Let us know how it goes.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I could have fainted, but Cousins actually have the balance complete in stock - so I should have an update later in the week.  I had to triple check it was the right part - delighted.

Assuming this is the cause, it’s been an interesting “note to self”.  Anything new to you and running consistently off-pace in the region of multiple minutes per hour - double check the actual and expected vph.

Many thanks for the arithmetic - blaming my 2 year old for not thinking of doing that immediately ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This problem comes up with other watches Rolex and Omega for instance. There are several watches from each of these companies where the base movement may run at one frequency others will run at other frequencies. Especially with Rolex unscrupulous sellers will put just about anything in the get the watch out the door claiming it running and not really pay attention to how well it's running.

The simplistic of all of this is the balance wheel oscillated at its natural frequency with its hairspring of course the timing machine will pick this up you can regulated absolutely perfectly and If the gear train ratio doesn't match your screwed.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some progress - new balance complete arrived this afternoon. Photo attached of the pair, with the correct one sitting out pre-installation - with jewel impulse.

Happily, the timegrapher immediately autodetected 19,800 off the new part.  

Strip down, cleaning and inspection lies ahead. An uneasy feeling remains - what else did ‘they’ get wrong?  I’ve been picking up some key parts (NOS) here and there just in case.

Regards - Rory

6B8F460E-9011-432B-858E-188259735FEF.jpeg

BA35F7D1-A3A0-4C62-8F08-DD7378A8FE29.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 2/22/2021 at 5:59 PM, Repivot said:

The difference between 19800 and 18000 is 1800 beats per hour. That is the difference of 360 seconds or -6 minutes an hour (based on a 18000bph standard) or about -5 minutes 25-30 seconds (based on a 19800bph standard). So you theory that the wrong balance complete was used is very likely. I suspect if a 19800 balance complete was installed you issue would resolve. Let us know how it goes.

Can you share your working for how 1800vph difference ends up as 360s?   Many thanks - Rory

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In an 18000bph watch, there are 5 beats per second. So 1800 ÷ 5 = 360.        360 seconds = 6 minutes

In a 19800bph watch there are 5.5 beats per second. So 1800 ÷ 5.5 = 327.27.         327 seconds = 5 minutes, 25.5ish seconds.

To be clear we are measuring beats per hour (bph) not vibrations per hour (vph). My understanding is a vibration is full oscillation of the balance one way then the other. Beats are just one way or tick.

It looks to be running slow on the timing machine, but also looks by the position of the regulator you have plenty of room to regulate it faster.

I hope it all works out.

Edited by Repivot
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • 🤔 leaving the EU meant that UK was no longer part of the convention and have already been turned down an independent reapplication. I'm pretty sure courts have to be held in Switzerland in this case. There will be a lot more watches stashed away in draws  tbh, folk wont be able to afford to maintain them. Cheap watches will be bought and top end watches by folk with plenty of cash that can pay for service and repair. The expensive once in a lifetime gifts and everything else inbetween will be at the forgotton when they stop working. I know i was being a numpty, get used to it 😄 Anybody that knows will boycott them, but besides repairers who will know. Nope will never buy one, i made that decision as soon as i learnt about this. 
    • although not in this case.  It was the Lugano Convention and its deficiencies that allowed a Swiss court decision in the first place.  This isnt really a Brexit issue at all.  A decision that affects both the EU and the UK should never have been heard in Switzerland. I bet the authorised service centres in the UK are pretty pleased.  It's a massive shame, though; I believe watch owners should be able to choose to have their watch serviced by whoever they trust.
    • Hi guys I think that old hippy is correct, it opens the gates for china to manufacture aftermarket spare parts. considering that they already do work on behalf of the Swiss I guess this decision gives the a little more legitimacy to tool up and I am sure they will take advantage of the situation either with or without the blessing of the Swiss watch industry  Having read about the protectionist machinations of the Swiss in the history of Europe they were the only ones to get fat at everybody else’s expense. I think the outcome could have been guessed at but ,  fair play to Cousins UK for standing up to them.  Now the question,  will everybody boycott Swiss watches and Swatch, no way they will still fill their coffers.  Me I stick with the Japanese once renowned for cheap shitty watches who came good through industrial effort and don’t for get the Russians that most dismiss as low grade crap. Wouldn’t buy a swatch product ever how about you all.? a
    • Hold the crown when in winding position, move the click away from the crown wheel, and then while holding the crown let it slowly unwind. I recollect that you must remove the automatic device bridge first, but maybe I'm wrong. You can first try without removing the automatic device bridge.
×
×
  • Create New...