Jump to content

Help identifying manufacturer / caliber


Recommended Posts

Hello Everyone,

My better half has come into posession of a very interesting artifact I am unable to identify and hope you can share any insights into what manufacturer this might be and what model.

2021-02-19_15-06-48.png.0ad6c483bf69c32b5c825f95f7d20b35.png

The caliber along with the dial is enclosed in a case that just opens up in the back, there is a hinge, so once it opens, one can take the entire movement out.

2021-02-19_15-05-16.png.bbc71b63284e043c41e8b7dc843ce64d.png

The back of the case has three very fine service marks, the last seems to be around 1997.

2021-02-19_15-05-50.png.401110ed9468276baee37cd1942f82fc.png

The little icon above the serial number on the case might represent a manufacturer, but I cannot quite make it out. To me it looks like a gloved hand.2021-02-19_15-04-35.png.ae2c909e7e50f6d1064eaab98d7d6dff.png

I have not taken it apart yet to have a look at the base plate for any additional markings. The balance wheel bridge has letters S and F, which points to a British or American manufacturer.

Any ideas or suggestions are welcome!

Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi there, the s and f you see on the balance bridge stands for fast and slow. It's for regulating the time telling. You need to remove the balance cock or bridge and see if there is a makers and movement id under there. Sometimes you can use a Loupe and you will be able to see without removing. Sometimes markings are under the dial. Have a look on the plate under the balance wheel. Once you find the maker head to this website for more information http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&2&2uswk

Hope this helps. 

Graziano 

Edited by Graziano
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While newer movements are marked under the balance, older ones are marked under the dial or not at all. The method I use for unknown or unmarked movements is by their finger prints, or the shape of the set lever bridge, set lever and detent. These can be matched to a specific maker and model number. If that fails, then likely it was made before parts were standardized. 

I'm certain this is not an American make.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Took it apart for cleaning. Still nothing. 

The main plate under the dial has a number - 4362. No databases return anything.

IMG_20210219_225136.thumb.jpg.bd887f87e6beb3b042a9c2024521bf3c.jpg

Here are setting parts, any resemblance to anything anyone has seen before?

IMG_20210219_225408_1.thumb.jpg.0cc34e41933134ab5a7ccaccdb9076b7.jpg

I have done a search by image, there are a few that look similar to 1920's Gruen watches, but those usually have the name prominently spelled out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like a Buren movement with the Finnish on the bridges from about the 1930s but then again anonymous Swiss ébauches (movements) made before the 1930s are not at all well documented. Catalogues of movements such as Bestfit generally only include movements made from the 1930s onwards, and usually require the movement size and the shape of the keyless mechanism cover plate. If the cover plate does not include the setting lever detent spring, it is unlikely that the movement will be listed in one of the catalogues.The really definitive "fingerprint" of a movement is the keyless mechanism, which is why materials parts suppliers such as Bestfit and Schwartchild often show only the components of the keyless mechanism in their movement identifications.

This bit of reading may help you understand who made your watch ,have a read ....https://www.vintagewatchstraps.com/whomademywatch.php

Edited by Graziano
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With unmarked movements the bestfit books are probably the best reference, Identifying via the setting lever spring and associated parts.  The books were put on the site by Old Hippy some while ago and were available for down load. They contain a mine of information .   Have a look for them through the search facility at the top right on the home screen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I checked the setting parts to the Bestfit system and found no match, so I would agree with Graziano that this likely predates the 1930s. It's going to be hard to identify it. 

The stamp in the case back likely identifies the metal used (gold, platinum, etc.) Or the case maker, but not likely the movement maker.

Among my parts watches I have a few that are of this vintage. I know the frustration of not being able to ID them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thank you all for the replies!  Very informative! True enough, the Gamsol took some time to evaporate and does leave a residue. So not all naphtha are created equal!  Need to find alternatives then. i was able to try Hexane recommended by Alex and it seems great.  I wonder what the cons are?
    • Yeah, I saw that in the tech sheet but I don't see how it can be adequately cleaned with the friction pinion still in place. I've accidentally pulled the arbor right out of the wheel once when I used a presto tool to try and remove it. Mark shows how he does it with the Platax tool. Those are a little too pricey for me so I got one of these from Aliexpress and I just push down on the arbor with the end of my brass tweezers. That usually gets it most of the way out and then I just grab the wheel with one hand the and the friction pinion with the other and gently rotate them until it pops off. Probably not the best way but it's seemed to work for me so far.    
    • Thanks, Jon Sounds like a plan. Obviously I'll have the face on so do you think gripping with the holder will create any problems, but I will check in the morning to see how feasible it is but I assume it only needs to be lightly held. As for holding the movement instead of the holder won't be possible in this scenario as one hand will be puling on the stem while the other pushes the spring down. That was my initial concern is how the hell can I do this with only one pair of hands. All the other times I've had to remove the stem hasn't been a problem, apart from the force required to release the stem from the setting lever, but now I need to fit the face and hands its sent me into panic mode. If it had the screw type release things would be a lot simpler but that's life 😀   Another thing I will need to consider is once the dial and hands are fitted and the movement is sitting in the case I will need to turn it over to put the case screws in. I saw a vid on Wristwatch revival where he lightly fitted the crystal and bezel so he could turn it over, is this the only option or is there another method?      
    • Hi Jon, do You think that relation spring torque - amplitude is linear? I would rather guess that the amplitude should be proportional to the square of the torque. I had once idea to check it, but still haven't.
    • I did not. I thought about it, but I had cleaned it in my ultrasonic, and the tech sheet shows lubricating it in place already assembled, so I figured discretion was the better part of valor. Although since I have to depth the jewels anyway, maybe I pull the pinion off to rule it out 100% as part of the problem. Do you know if there's a safe way to do it? I don't want to use a puller because it would push down on the plane of the wheel, and that seems like a Bad Idea. I thought about using a roller table remover, but I don't think I have a hole stake pointy enough to push it down.
×
×
  • Create New...