Jump to content

Mainspring lubrication, manual and automatic


Recommended Posts

I know they say to lubricate the bridle of the mainspring, but does the rest of the mainspring need grease like a manual wind? Also what kind of grease does one recommend for the bridle and also how much to apply? Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Karim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

I am in the process of servicing a ETA 2671 that has been sitting in a drawer for over twenty years. The oscillating bearing was faulty and so I changed.

However the mainspring is what I call sett and therefore needs changing. My question is what lubricant should I use for the inside of the barrel.

Edited by clockboy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Barrels will take any amount of abuse and still work.. I seen watches with what looks like wd-40 in the barrels and they still work fine.

 

The idea of using the correct grease is it manages winding of the watch and sets the point at which the mainspring 'slips' to avoid overwinding.

 

Normal oil is too slippery and will allow the mainspring to 'slip' too early.. resulting in to the spring not being watch fully and power reserve suffers.

 

No oil will result in the mainspring not releasing.. resulting in unnecessary stress on the automatic winding mechanism.

 

hope this gives you a better understanding of mainspring oiling.

 

Anil

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi anilv,

 

Thank you for the explanation.

 

Which arises the following questions:

 

If I'm full servicing a watch, let's say, one of those vintage Seiko 5, would it be OK not to open/service the barrel (and spring) in order not to disturb the original lube?

 

or maybe because this watch/lube is too old (or another reason I can't think of), would it be better to just go ahead and do the whole barrel thing?

 

(I'm trying to find best practices/recommendations for a like now restoration here)

 

I understand Seiko uses a special synthetic lube in those barrels (S-4). It looks like some black stuff/dirt which is the color of molybdenum disulfide, the stuff they put in it). The reason for the question is two fold:

 

one because this grease doesn't go nicely. When pre-cleaning everything turns black and dirty (cotton swabs, rodico, etc) then it goes in the cleaning machine and the fluids get dirty too! (the cost per part during the cleaning process is high)

 

two, the way both halves of the drum seal makes it prone to ever slightly bend the parts when taking it apart or forfeit the original tightness from the factory once the halves are disassembled. (wobbly or out of shape/seal is "broken")

 

I'd love to hear thoughts about this issue. Also if I should, once the drum is disassembled (as I've done with previous watches) should I coat the spring with Moebius 8200 regardless of having Moebius 8217 covering the drum walls ( or in the case of Seiko, S-4)?

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My advise for what its worth is always always open the barrel to have at least a look.  I learned the hard way once, serviced a watch that was running but poorly. So I did not touch the barrel after the service it still would not run for more that 5 hrs. When I did take the barrel apart the spring was broken. Don,t ask me how it was winding up and running as it is a mystery but since then I always inspect the spring to check for damage and to see if the spring is sett. Also the barrel wall on a automatic if damaged can cause issues.

Edited by clockboy
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My advise for what its worth is always always open the barrel to have at least a look. I learned the hard way once, serviced a watch that was running but poorly. So I did not touch the barrel after the service it still would not run for more that 5 hrs. When I did take the barrel apart the spring was broken. Don,t ask me how it was winding up and running as it is a mystery but since then I always inspect the spring to check for damage and to see if the spring is sett. Also the barrel wall on a automatic if damaged can cause issues.

My first teacher during my apprenticeship never removed the mainspring when servicing (unless it was broken). Over the following years I found this to be bad practice and I always open the barrel and remove the mainspring prior to service. I have found many broken or almost broken mainspring hooks as a result and I suspect this has reduced the amount of return jobs significantly. :)

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Bob,

 

The manufacturer's recommendation is to replace the barrel complete. Having said that, buying a 20dollar part (+shipping in my case) for a 20 dollar watch is not economically sound unless you're going for a rebuild of a watch which has high value (chrono, vintage diver). Some Swiss high-beat movements used sealed mainsprings, in these cases since the value of the watch may be higher and to achieve the accuracy it was designed for it is worth spending the money on a new barrel/spring.

 

 

In most of the cases with the Seiko barrels/springs, I have found that that the lubricant has deteriorated to the extent that it serves no purpose and may even hinder the correct function of the watch.

 

I agree with you that the barrel cover is flimsy. It gets its strength through the rigidity offered by the large lip around its circumference, rather than other watches where the cover itself is quite thick. To avoid distorting the cover, pry it up just a little bit and work your way around. Don't try to get it off in one go.

 

One reason that i usually open the barrels on these Seikos is that they use one bridge for both train and barrel. If you suspect that the mainspring is giving problems then you have to remove everything from the balance onwards. Unlike in most Swiss watches where the barrel can be removed without disturbing the other stuff.

 

To avoid getting all that black stuff all over your desk, open the barrel and rinse it in some other fluid.. thinner or even WD-40 to get the worst of it off. I usually soak it for a few minutes in thinner.. (beware of flames, no smoking etc...)

 

 

Anil

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you Anil, that's good advice! I'll definitely use some of the fluids you suggest for a good pre clean since they are cheaper and readily available. And, no, I quit smoking a long time ago so there is no problem there, thanks you.

 

By the way,  would gas/gasoline/petrol (different names for the same thing) be suitable too? Do those regular solvents can be used on other watch parts for pre cleaning?...also in the ultrasonic machine (always for pre cleaning)?

 

Sorry for the many questions but that's the price I pay for learning at a risk of being too much!

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Bob,

 

I wouldn't use anything flammable in the ultrasonic as it generates some heat.

 

Apart from that use the same caution as you would handling thinner.. don't breath the fumes, dispose properly.

 

On using them for other parts, if they're steel then its ok. But if the parts have shellac then these fluids will melt the shellac.

 

Specifically the pallet fork and balance wheel, the pallet jewels are held in by shellac and if you use thinners/petrol the shellac will soften and the jewels may get loose, and you have to reset them. Likewise the roller jewel (that wot drives the pallet fork) on the balance is usually held in place with shellac as well.

 

Naphta (lighter fluid) is quite cheap and does not affect shellac, if the watch is unusually dirty I would soak the whole movement in it, agitating it slowly.

 

 

Dials and datewheels are not cleanable with fluids..

 

Anil

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you Anil, I will probably use lighter fluid for most everything. I happen to have a couple of bottles around. I will not use the ultrasonic though, I was thinking more on the line of cotton swabs on the big parts and the agitation as you described for smaller ones.

 

The balance wheel and pallet fork I usually clean normally and by themselves. I rather spend a little more cleaner on those than risk damaging them, the expense is minimal.

 

I'm glad you told me about the date wheels! Just in time my friend!

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

I am servicing my vintage Omega Seamaster (cal 552) and will be fitting a new mainspring. 

I will be buying a NOS Omega original which is likely to be many years old (my watch dates back to 1966/7). 

Should I remove it from the holder and clean/relube before fitting or can I just put it into the cleaned barrel with braking grease having applied oil to barrel bottom before fitting and apply oil to spring top after fitting? 

I do not have a winding tool so will have to do all by hand and would like to avoid removal from holder if possible. 

Any advice will be much appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi canthus,

 

Considering the NOS barrel may be so old, chances are greases might not be in good shape so I would service the part before using it. I haven't had this problem so far so I wouldn't be able to talk from experience. Maybe another member could make a better statement than me.

 

Cheers,

 

Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
×
×
  • Create New...