Jump to content

Any thoughts on this Watch and Strange Rotor


Recommended Posts

Hi there JD, that is what you call a bumper movement 

A bumper movement is a type of self-winding, automatic movement.

However, unlike a modern automatic, which has the rotor spins a full 360 degrees, a bumper moves back and forth at about 120 degrees.They are fun to wear. You can feel a slight thud as you turn your wrist reminding you that you are wearing a bumper. It is an interesting method to wind the watch that avoids infringing on full rotor patents.Hope that helps 

Cheers Graziano 

Edited by Graziano
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like an AS1171 which as @Graziano says is a bumper movement. As such the oscillating weight doesn't make a full rotation at all but swings back and forth through an arc of about 170 degrees, bumping off the buffer springs that you can see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/4/2021 at 2:58 AM, Kobus said:

Thanks. Enjoyed that. 

 

On 1/4/2021 at 5:18 PM, luiazazrambo said:

I did not even know that it is called dressing (English is not my mother tongue). Interestingly I have not read your advise or any other advise after the video for dressing and I almost did the same thing on my own following common sense. I worked on my brass tweezers internally first - the only difference was that i used grit 800 and i did not fold it only worked on one of them at the time -, then i worked on them along the sides - perpendicular. I am sure it is not perfect as I did it more or less the first time, but i am sure it is a way better then they were before. I also bought a pair of Dumont tweezers as you are not the first one who said the same thing but with different words: "it was like going from a riding lawn mower to a Rolls Royce". However i have not felt that big jump, i bought a set of 8 stainless steel tweezers from cousinsuk and they are quite ok. (They were advertised as "Superior Quality" but could not compare them to something else - before the Dumont - as it was my first set ever for watchmaking) Well they are good or I am just not experienced enough to feel the difference between those and the Dumont. When I look at them under the microscope the Dumont looks better though. ?

I know: practice, practice, practice.

All in all very good advice, thank you. ?

 

On 1/7/2021 at 5:55 PM, Poljot said:

Being a pirate is no longer a requirement on immigration application.

Arrr

 

22 minutes ago, Marc said:

Looks like an AS1171 which as @Graziano says is a bumper movement. As such the oscillating weight doesn't make a full rotation at all but swings back and forth through an arc of about 170 degrees, bumping off the buffer springs that you can see.

Thanks Mark. I will be stripping it down and getting it working and looking good again. Cool watch that I got in a trade for work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Graziano said:

Hi there JD, that is what you call a bumper movement 

A bumper movement is a type of self-winding, automatic movement.

However, unlike a modern automatic, which has the rotor spins a full 360 degrees, a bumper moves back and forth at about 120 degrees.They are fun to wear. You can feel a slight thud as you turn your wrist reminding you that you are wearing a bumper. It is an interesting method to wind the watch that avoids infringing on full rotor patents.Hope that helps 

Cheers Graziano 

Very appreciated. I was stumped when I first saw this movement as I was thinking “where the heck is the rotor “ ? interesting but simple design. When it says incabloc , what is the company that produced by his watch?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/18/2021 at 10:06 PM, jdrichard said:

Very appreciated. I was stumped when I first saw this movement as I was thinking “where the heck is the rotor “ ? interesting but simple design. When it says incabloc , what is the company that produced by his watch?

I don't know who made your watch I can't see makers name but back in the mid-20thcentury, the “Incabloc” trademark was a sign of quality and excellence for watches, to the point that brands would print it on their dials, and I have seen incabloc on rotors just like yours. 

 

Edited by Graziano
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Graziano said:

I don't know who made your watch I can't see makers name but back in the mid-20thcentury, the “Incabloc” trademark was a sign of quality and excellence for watches, to the point that brands would print it on their dials, and I have seen incabloc on rotors just like yours. 

Incabloc-shock-absorber-device-animated.gif

Thanks. I do have another 24 Jewel incabloc. Btw, this watch has a radioactive radium dial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 I have got two bumper automatics( AS made specially for Mido), with the original MS still in the barrel, a detached special spindle. Though a regulare type spring replacement can't be ruled out, I wonder what original MS in my watch is telling.

 I suggest you check and try to source a MS for this before investing time in it.

Regs

Joe

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/19/2021 at 2:04 AM, Graziano said:

I don't know who made your watch I can't see makers name but back in the mid-20thcentury, the “Incabloc” trademark was a sign of quality and excellence for watches, to the point that brands would print it on their dials, and I have seen incabloc on rotors just like yours. 

Incabloc-shock-absorber-device-animated.gif

Hi Graziano,  Do I have your permission to repost this (Picture or whatever its called) in the froum as it will surely come needed. 

Regs 

Joe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

Hi Graziano,  Do I have your permission to repost this (Picture or whatever its called) in the froum as it will surely come needed. 

Regs 

Joe

Hi Joe, please delete it as I didn't even think about that, I don't want to cause any problems. Sorry about that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Graziano said:

Hi Joe, please delete it as I didn't even think about that, I don't want to cause any problems. Sorry about that. 

Hi Graziano,  I don't think there is any problem with you post.

I find this gifs very useful specially helpful to me when I try to explain things with my broken English.

I was just asking for your permission to use it, playing polite, didn't want to just steal it.

Regs 

Joe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

Hi Graziano,  I don't think there is any problem with you post.

I find this gifs very useful specially helpful to me when I try to explain things with my broken English.

I was just asking for your permission to use it, playing polite, didn't want to just steal it.

Regs 

Joe

 

Incabloc-shock-absorber-device-animated.gifAlso this link is helpful for explanation, 

 

Edited by Graziano
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ok thanks Ross, I will give that a try!😁
    • Welcome my friend. 
    • Been there. Worn that Tshirt.  'ping'. Hands and knees. Nothing. Nada. 20 minutes? Ha! I found it 7 month later. How? Well, after advice from a member, I invested in a £4 UV light torch.  Hands and knees looking for a 'ping' from a Sekonda, found them both within 30 seconds. UV makes the jewel shine. easy peasy. Could have taken longer. Just lucky on the location of the search. Hope this helps.
    • Thanks Dell. I thought about silver soldering. Have never done it but would like to give it a go. Do you think to put flux on the butted joint then run the solder in or to maybe brace it with a piece of scrap spring steel?
    • Never and others. Yes, like you I do spend a fair amount of time reading the contents of this forum. I find it better that any other. Clear, lucid, no Prima Donas, and most of all an easy access without adverts. All thanks to Mark. God bless you mate. You give so much to many of us. What if? No Mark? Hypothetically. A forum. I did run a forum for a few years. Really enjoyed it, but became so engrossed that it did affect my health. I gave to to others to run. Not been back. It was very successful and rivalled a number of large paying sites. No adverts, no others but me. I did ask and listen to members comments and it worked well.    Costs Having a domain name, £10 annually.  Register the site with a forum company, free. Build the site using the forum company guide lines, free. It looked and ran almost the same a Mark's. All the same facilities. The cost was only £5 per month, but counted visits (views). If I recall, it was that price for 5,000 views. Each extra 5,000 views increased the price by £2 per month. Success was my own personal undoing. From £5 per month initially, it rose to £60 a month and looked like increasing. This was 10 years ago. I could not afford that, and asked it anyone would like to take over and someone did. I would assume that this is the price that Mark is funding for us all. His return is our continued comments on the internet about his course, and the fact that many of the big names on YouTube mention him as their Tutor. Those of us who have done, and are still using, his course, benefit. In comparison to other courses, I can't believe how cheap it is, and the value is exceptional. It is the structure that gives the value. Long may Mark reign. Ross  
×
×
  • Create New...