Jump to content

FHF 96-4 erratic rate and amplitude after service


SPIGGOTT

Recommended Posts

I am new to the hobby and only on my 4th service of a watch.  The first 3 have gone without any issues.

The latest one being a FHF ST96-4 movement. 

I put it on the timegrapher (Weishi 1900) to check it after servicing and to regulate.  All looked good at first then i adjusted the rate and beat error as it was loosing a little.  During this the balance wheel stopped (i did not touch it), so i move the levers back and it started again with a very poor amplitude.   Small adjustment and all started working again.

When it runs now there is no consistency in the rate or amplitude.  can go from -6 to -36 every few seconds.  the amplitude also changes from 284 to 295. The Beat error is 0.0ms.  The change is not dramatic like -6 to -36 in one go but runs steady for about 20 seconds then changes to 0 gain for 4-5 seconds when it resumes the rate goes lower.  Odd is at some times it gains and goes back to -6 as though it was resetting itself.

 

This is the output from the timegrapher.   I am assuming at this point it is an issue with the balance wheel / CAP Jewels???

 

IMG_8732.thumb.jpg.1f63bac6bbc212d93726908c0f2ceafa.jpg

 

 

Below is another one i have done showing normal results after regulating.

IMG_8733.thumb.jpg.2109ba6f4962aac1a72ea72216ab1945.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Periodic eraticity if correspondes to the period of a gear in the train, either on its own teeth or pinion or both ,imperfect jewel or bent/damage arbour, damage may not be noticable under normal eye loupe magnification. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since the erratic nature did not show before I started to regulate, I figure it must have something to do with the balance wheel.   Just took it out to inspect under microscope but could not see any damage to pins, spring or impulse pin.

I have a spare movement (not serviced) with a complete balance.  Swapped it out and put back on timegrapher.  All looks ok.  -18s/d, 251 amp and 0.5ms beat error. Nice consistent reading.

 

Again, I can not see any difference or faults when comparing both of them under a microscope.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, SPIGGOTT said:

Again, I can not see any difference or faults when comparing both of them under a microscope

Often times people with microscopes can see the dust on the pine needles in the forest but can't see the trees.

Then interesting on the timing machine you appear to have two separate lift angles?

Then what happens if you rotate the microphone so the crown is facing down what is that look like On the timing machine?

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SPIGGOTT said:

Since the erratic nature did not show before I started to regulate, I figure it must have something to do with the balance wheel.   

Imperfections across the terminal curve of hairspring, might change its coil configuration, causing intermitent sticking, fouling ....etc. 

Genterate more data please in various positions.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

Imperfections across the terminal curve of hairspring, might change its coil configuration, causing intermitent sticking, fouling ....etc. 

Genterate more data please in various positions.

 

So configuration of the coil might have changed as you moved the regulator arm, unlevel, coning so on.

Have you checked coil levelness from side view?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone for the guidance.  I figured out the issue after watching some of Mark’s tutorials on the Unitas 6489.

He noticed that after servicing a new movement a few times he had the same issue with the balance.   It appears that it was not the balance at all but a few marks where it attaches to the main plate.  Basically screwdriver twists in the mainplate that lifted the balance slightly.

so when screwed down it was too tight and pushing against the cap jewels and springs.  This is why it was erratic. Must have put some further down pressure when I turned the regulator arms.

 

 


 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SPIGGOTT said:

when screwed down it was too tight and pushing against the cap jewels and springs. 

That is called endshake, very important to be right at least on the balance and escapement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh nice. I have a similar wedge style stump for my staking tool, so I'll give that a shot. Thanks!
    • Thank you all for the replies!  Very informative! True enough, the Gamsol took some time to evaporate and does leave a residue. So not all naphtha are created equal!  Need to find alternatives then. i was able to try Hexane recommended by Alex and it seems great.  I wonder what the cons are?
    • Yeah, I saw that in the tech sheet but I don't see how it can be adequately cleaned with the friction pinion still in place. I've accidentally pulled the arbor right out of the wheel once when I used a presto tool to try and remove it. Mark shows how he does it with the Platax tool. Those are a little too pricey for me so I got one of these from Aliexpress and I just push down on the arbor with the end of my brass tweezers. That usually gets it most of the way out and then I just grab the wheel with one hand the and the friction pinion with the other and gently rotate them until it pops off. Probably not the best way but it's seemed to work for me so far.    
    • Thanks, Jon Sounds like a plan. Obviously I'll have the face on so do you think gripping with the holder will create any problems, but I will check in the morning to see how feasible it is but I assume it only needs to be lightly held. As for holding the movement instead of the holder won't be possible in this scenario as one hand will be puling on the stem while the other pushes the spring down. That was my initial concern is how the hell can I do this with only one pair of hands. All the other times I've had to remove the stem hasn't been a problem, apart from the force required to release the stem from the setting lever, but now I need to fit the face and hands its sent me into panic mode. If it had the screw type release things would be a lot simpler but that's life 😀   Another thing I will need to consider is once the dial and hands are fitted and the movement is sitting in the case I will need to turn it over to put the case screws in. I saw a vid on Wristwatch revival where he lightly fitted the crystal and bezel so he could turn it over, is this the only option or is there another method?      
    • Hi Jon, do You think that relation spring torque - amplitude is linear? I would rather guess that the amplitude should be proportional to the square of the torque. I had once idea to check it, but still haven't.
×
×
  • Create New...