Jump to content

FHF 96-4 erratic rate and amplitude after service


SPIGGOTT

Recommended Posts

I am new to the hobby and only on my 4th service of a watch.  The first 3 have gone without any issues.

The latest one being a FHF ST96-4 movement. 

I put it on the timegrapher (Weishi 1900) to check it after servicing and to regulate.  All looked good at first then i adjusted the rate and beat error as it was loosing a little.  During this the balance wheel stopped (i did not touch it), so i move the levers back and it started again with a very poor amplitude.   Small adjustment and all started working again.

When it runs now there is no consistency in the rate or amplitude.  can go from -6 to -36 every few seconds.  the amplitude also changes from 284 to 295. The Beat error is 0.0ms.  The change is not dramatic like -6 to -36 in one go but runs steady for about 20 seconds then changes to 0 gain for 4-5 seconds when it resumes the rate goes lower.  Odd is at some times it gains and goes back to -6 as though it was resetting itself.

 

This is the output from the timegrapher.   I am assuming at this point it is an issue with the balance wheel / CAP Jewels???

 

IMG_8732.thumb.jpg.1f63bac6bbc212d93726908c0f2ceafa.jpg

 

 

Below is another one i have done showing normal results after regulating.

IMG_8733.thumb.jpg.2109ba6f4962aac1a72ea72216ab1945.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Periodic eraticity if correspondes to the period of a gear in the train, either on its own teeth or pinion or both ,imperfect jewel or bent/damage arbour, damage may not be noticable under normal eye loupe magnification. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since the erratic nature did not show before I started to regulate, I figure it must have something to do with the balance wheel.   Just took it out to inspect under microscope but could not see any damage to pins, spring or impulse pin.

I have a spare movement (not serviced) with a complete balance.  Swapped it out and put back on timegrapher.  All looks ok.  -18s/d, 251 amp and 0.5ms beat error. Nice consistent reading.

 

Again, I can not see any difference or faults when comparing both of them under a microscope.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, SPIGGOTT said:

Again, I can not see any difference or faults when comparing both of them under a microscope

Often times people with microscopes can see the dust on the pine needles in the forest but can't see the trees.

Then interesting on the timing machine you appear to have two separate lift angles?

Then what happens if you rotate the microphone so the crown is facing down what is that look like On the timing machine?

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SPIGGOTT said:

Since the erratic nature did not show before I started to regulate, I figure it must have something to do with the balance wheel.   

Imperfections across the terminal curve of hairspring, might change its coil configuration, causing intermitent sticking, fouling ....etc. 

Genterate more data please in various positions.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

Imperfections across the terminal curve of hairspring, might change its coil configuration, causing intermitent sticking, fouling ....etc. 

Genterate more data please in various positions.

 

So configuration of the coil might have changed as you moved the regulator arm, unlevel, coning so on.

Have you checked coil levelness from side view?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone for the guidance.  I figured out the issue after watching some of Mark’s tutorials on the Unitas 6489.

He noticed that after servicing a new movement a few times he had the same issue with the balance.   It appears that it was not the balance at all but a few marks where it attaches to the main plate.  Basically screwdriver twists in the mainplate that lifted the balance slightly.

so when screwed down it was too tight and pushing against the cap jewels and springs.  This is why it was erratic. Must have put some further down pressure when I turned the regulator arms.

 

 


 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SPIGGOTT said:

when screwed down it was too tight and pushing against the cap jewels and springs. 

That is called endshake, very important to be right at least on the balance and escapement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Put the movement in a movement holder and it will be supported as you push down on the setting lever post to release the winding stem. Make sure the post is over the shoulder of the movement holder so what you are pressing down on is supported. As a general rule, hold the movement and not the movement holder. Replace the hands when the movement isn't in the case and support the centre jewel (if it has one) on a hard surface or staking block when replacing the hands to stop the jewel accidentally moving or even coming out. A dedicated movement holder with a central jewel support is even better, but pricey
    • It might help us if we knew which watch like model number.
    • Hi, guys I have a bit of a predicament and hopefully, somebody can advise. I'm working on a Roamer MST 521 where the movement is extracted from the crystal side. I'm now at the final hurdle where I need to replace the movement back into its case but I'm not sure of the correct procedure. I still need to fit the hands but that's where the problem lies. If I insert the winding stem to test the hands for correct alignment I will need to turn the movement over to release the stem again it's the spring-loaded type and needs a small bit of force to push down but with the hands fitted, I don't think I can do this on a cushion without causing some damage to the hands and that's the last thing I want to do, this watch has already been a love-hate relationship and I'm so close to boxing this one off which I'm counting as my first major project.  The other option is to case the movement then fit the hands and hope everything is okay. I've already broken the original winding stem but managed to find a replacement, the last one in stock, so I'm a bit reluctant to keep removing it. Any suggestions would be appreciated. 
    • I would go for the dearer spring. You won't need to remove the spring from the carrier ring and then use a mainspring winder to get it into the barrel, for a start. Also that spring is closer to the needed dimensions, especially the length. The length plays a part in the mainsprings strength. If you double the length you will half the force (strength) of the spring and vice-versa. A spring with 20 mm less length would be about 7% shorter, so technically would be 7% more strength, but I find halving this number is closer to real-world findings, so the spring would be about 3 to 4% more strength/force. On a mainspring that ideally kicks out 300 degrees of amplitude, a 3% increase in amplitude would be 309 degrees. Increasing or decreasing the length of the mainspring will affect the power reserve to a greater or lesser degree. It depends how much shorter or longer it is. I've attached a lesson regarding mainsprings, focussing on the size and strength of the spring within the barrel, you might find helpful. Unfortunately it is a PDF converted from a PowerPoint presentation, but only a slide was lost that was originally a video of fitting a mainspring   Lesson 5 The mainspring.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...