Jump to content

FHF 96-4 erratic rate and amplitude after service


SPIGGOTT

Recommended Posts

I am new to the hobby and only on my 4th service of a watch.  The first 3 have gone without any issues.

The latest one being a FHF ST96-4 movement. 

I put it on the timegrapher (Weishi 1900) to check it after servicing and to regulate.  All looked good at first then i adjusted the rate and beat error as it was loosing a little.  During this the balance wheel stopped (i did not touch it), so i move the levers back and it started again with a very poor amplitude.   Small adjustment and all started working again.

When it runs now there is no consistency in the rate or amplitude.  can go from -6 to -36 every few seconds.  the amplitude also changes from 284 to 295. The Beat error is 0.0ms.  The change is not dramatic like -6 to -36 in one go but runs steady for about 20 seconds then changes to 0 gain for 4-5 seconds when it resumes the rate goes lower.  Odd is at some times it gains and goes back to -6 as though it was resetting itself.

 

This is the output from the timegrapher.   I am assuming at this point it is an issue with the balance wheel / CAP Jewels???

 

IMG_8732.thumb.jpg.1f63bac6bbc212d93726908c0f2ceafa.jpg

 

 

Below is another one i have done showing normal results after regulating.

IMG_8733.thumb.jpg.2109ba6f4962aac1a72ea72216ab1945.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Periodic eraticity if correspondes to the period of a gear in the train, either on its own teeth or pinion or both ,imperfect jewel or bent/damage arbour, damage may not be noticable under normal eye loupe magnification. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since the erratic nature did not show before I started to regulate, I figure it must have something to do with the balance wheel.   Just took it out to inspect under microscope but could not see any damage to pins, spring or impulse pin.

I have a spare movement (not serviced) with a complete balance.  Swapped it out and put back on timegrapher.  All looks ok.  -18s/d, 251 amp and 0.5ms beat error. Nice consistent reading.

 

Again, I can not see any difference or faults when comparing both of them under a microscope.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, SPIGGOTT said:

Again, I can not see any difference or faults when comparing both of them under a microscope

Often times people with microscopes can see the dust on the pine needles in the forest but can't see the trees.

Then interesting on the timing machine you appear to have two separate lift angles?

Then what happens if you rotate the microphone so the crown is facing down what is that look like On the timing machine?

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SPIGGOTT said:

Since the erratic nature did not show before I started to regulate, I figure it must have something to do with the balance wheel.   

Imperfections across the terminal curve of hairspring, might change its coil configuration, causing intermitent sticking, fouling ....etc. 

Genterate more data please in various positions.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

Imperfections across the terminal curve of hairspring, might change its coil configuration, causing intermitent sticking, fouling ....etc. 

Genterate more data please in various positions.

 

So configuration of the coil might have changed as you moved the regulator arm, unlevel, coning so on.

Have you checked coil levelness from side view?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone for the guidance.  I figured out the issue after watching some of Mark’s tutorials on the Unitas 6489.

He noticed that after servicing a new movement a few times he had the same issue with the balance.   It appears that it was not the balance at all but a few marks where it attaches to the main plate.  Basically screwdriver twists in the mainplate that lifted the balance slightly.

so when screwed down it was too tight and pushing against the cap jewels and springs.  This is why it was erratic. Must have put some further down pressure when I turned the regulator arms.

 

 


 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SPIGGOTT said:

when screwed down it was too tight and pushing against the cap jewels and springs. 

That is called endshake, very important to be right at least on the balance and escapement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • people be honest.... Swatch is evil for the watchmakers and repairers, BUT not everything in watches from Switzerland is from the Swatch-Group. As far as i know, Selitta got sacked by Swatch as a Movement-Assembler for them and they started to produce Movements in their own Name with slight Modifications. As far as i know, they sell Parts to the Market for their Movements. In most cases, if a ETA-Movement fails, it is a valid Option to replace it with a Selitta Movement, which i consider the Solution for this Mess with the Swatch-Group...... I have no Connection to anybody at Selitta, but being a Swiss-Guy, i still like to have Swiss-Made Watches, but not from the Swatch-Group.   ok ? regards, Ernst
    • Just one more greedy act by Swatch. They started a number of years ago here in the US..cutting off supplies to watchmakers that could build complications that many Swatch houses couldn't even touch. Old school masters who had gone through some of the most prestigious houses in the world. Otto Frei has some statements on their page about it. I tell all my customers to avoid new Swiss watches like the plague,..unless they just want an older one in their collection that still has some parts out on the market, or they have really deep pockets and don't mind waiting months and paying through the nose to get it back. Plenty of others to choose from..IE Seiko,..or other non-swiss brands Even a number of Chinese brands are catching up with the Swiss,..and I think that in time, their actions will be their downfall
    • Yes. If that's not what you are experiencing...start looking for something rubbing. A 1st guess is that one of the hands is rubbing against the hole in the center of the dial. Especially if you now have lower amplitude in face up/ face down positions.
    • Once a movement has the dial and hands put back and it is recased, would you expect the assembled watch to have the same amplitude as when the movement is in a movement holder and is without hands and dial? Thanks
    • C07641+ not sure what the "+" is for after the last digit.
×
×
  • Create New...