Jump to content

Other than Cousins, anywhere to buy GR mainsprings?

MikeRaleighNC
 Share

Recommended Posts

MikeRaleighNC Member

MikeRaleighNC

Posted
Posted

Hello -  I'm trying to source a mainspring for the Seiko 70XX series (GR2377x) and Cousins is out of stock. Not the first time that Cousins seems to be the one and only place to get a mainspring (among other parts). Anyone aware of another way to order GR mainsprings and/or source a suitable replacement? I am resourceful and am aware of them popping up on ebay from time to time and the ability to get one from a donor movement. However, Seiko mainsprings often need a refresh more than their swiss brethren, IMO.

Thanks in advance!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jdrichard Distinguished Member

jdrichard

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, MikeRaleighNC said:

I don't see them sold on their site. Should I just call them? I appreciate your help, thanks. (ps, love your youtube content)

Hey, big thanks. Cutting a balance staff on Friday and putting it on YouTube. The closeups should be great with my new setup.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MikeRaleighNC Member

MikeRaleighNC

Posted
  • Author
Posted
17 hours ago, MikeRaleighNC said:

Connected with Jules Borel; they show the 0201075 (barrel complex for the 7S26B/C as being a substitute for the 0201024 (70XX barrel complete). Though I read somewhere they have different specs; anyone know?

Ordered the 0201075 as a substitute for the specified 0201024; will report back whether it works (cannot find this question resolved elsewhere on the web)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MikeRaleighNC Member

MikeRaleighNC

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
On 1/6/2021 at 10:17 AM, MikeRaleighNC said:

Ordered the 0201075 as a substitute for the specified 0201024; will report back whether it works (cannot find this question resolved elsewhere on the web)

Confirmed: 0201075 is a suitable replacement for the 0201024. The teeth of the 075 seem a bit rounder than the 024 (which each come to a point), but it seems to mesh just fine with the train. Power wise, it seems to have the same strength (0.11mm) as the 024, though I did not open the barrel to measure.

I have issues with 70XX movements having lower-than-ideal amplitude (180 to 210 degrees); I might try the 0.12mm strength mainspring used in 7s26c to see if it helps.

Edited by MikeRaleighNC
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JohnR725 Distinguished Member

JohnR725

Posted
Posted

 One of the problems with getting mainsprings now is there's a limited number of sources that actually make mainsprings. I've noticed sometimes with American pocket watch mainsprings Coming in a envelope with a company name. But when I look at the actual mainspring package I recognize the number is a GR number. So it's conceivable that generic mainsprings if their new could be what you're searching for perhaps.

16 hours ago, MikeRaleighNC said:

I have issues with 70XX movements having lower-than-ideal amplitude (180 to 210 degrees); I might try the 0.12mm strength mainspring used in 7s26c to see if it helps.

Seiko with their all their watches almost never gives you specifications except. The only place any references to amplitude is ever been found at least in the older tech sheets is the Seiko 4006. you will note that Seiko is not expecting huge amplitudes out of their watches they were designed that way.

Then I have a link below to a site listing lift angles. Looks like for the Seiko watches in the 7000 series it's 53°.

https://watchguy.co.uk/cgi-bin/lift_angles

Seiko 4006a amplitude 180° fully wound up.JPG

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jdm Distinguished Member

jdm

Posted
Posted
On 1/6/2021 at 4:17 PM, MikeRaleighNC said:

Ordered the 0201075 as a substitute for the specified 0201024; will report back whether it works (cannot find this question resolved elsewhere on the web)

Strange that you dind't find the previous discussions on this subject, or to the 7S26 parts reference sheet that I maintain, it has that compatibility information and more.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vRN2UULQKTfKmhRStZhDdIOIQrqd6sPB-g6x2SKyQQjOvTBjG_7TQXQhAT4f1WqAX5QAPkIimi-3jqd/pubhtml

 

7 hours ago, Rafael said:

Seiko watches usually have a higher lift angle than swiss watches.  Make sure to check the correct lift angle prior to checking the amplitude.

Maybe you are referring to older or more exotic mov.ts? Because Seikos has 53 deg, pretty much the same as any ETA, for example.
Also, as often mentioned, having a "wrong" lift angle in the machine only influences the amplitude reading very little, as in 2 degs per one of difference. If one has low amplitude as the OP mentioned, can't blame that.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MikeRaleighNC Member

MikeRaleighNC

Posted
  • Author
Posted
6 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

 One of the problems with getting mainsprings now is there's a limited number of sources that actually make mainsprings. I've noticed sometimes with American pocket watch mainsprings Coming in a envelope with a company name. But when I look at the actual mainspring package I recognize the number is a GR number. So it's conceivable that generic mainsprings if their new could be what you're searching for perhaps.

Seiko with their all their watches almost never gives you specifications except. The only place any references to amplitude is ever been found at least in the older tech sheets is the Seiko 4006. you will note that Seiko is not expecting huge amplitudes out of their watches they were designed that way.

Then I have a link below to a site listing lift angles. Looks like for the Seiko watches in the 7000 series it's 53°.

https://watchguy.co.uk/cgi-bin/lift_angles

Seiko 4006a amplitude 180° fully wound up.JPG

Very helpful validation that a healthy vintage Seiko still might not achieve 250+ amplitude. Regarding lift angle, I have taken that into account (e.g. 53).

5 hours ago, jdm said:

Strange that you dind't find a pointer to the previous discussion on this subject, or to the 7S26 parts reference sheet that I maintain, it has that compatibility information and more.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vRN2UULQKTfKmhRStZhDdIOIQrqd6sPB-g6x2SKyQQjOvTBjG_7TQXQhAT4f1WqAX5QAPkIimi-3jqd/pubhtml

 

Maybe you are referring to older or more exotic mov.ts? Because Seikos has 53 deg, pretty much the same as any ETA.
Also, as often mentioned, having a "wrong" lift angle in the machine influences the amplitude reading very little, as in 2 degs per one of difference. If one has low amplitude as the OP mentioned, can't blame that.

Thanks for pointing this out; I did not uncover that in my search for the answer. Regarding lift angles, I can confirm some of them are higher. Notably, the 61XX and 63XX series are 54.5 and the 52XX series at 56. 

Thanks all for the helpful discussion. Hopefully folks find this feed useful in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rafael WRT Addict

Rafael

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, jdm said:

Strange that you dind't find the previous discussions on this subject, or to the 7S26 parts reference sheet that I maintain, it has that compatibility information and more.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vRN2UULQKTfKmhRStZhDdIOIQrqd6sPB-g6x2SKyQQjOvTBjG_7TQXQhAT4f1WqAX5QAPkIimi-3jqd/pubhtml

 

Maybe you are referring to older or more exotic mov.ts? Because Seikos has 53 deg, pretty much the same as any ETA, for example.
Also, as often mentioned, having a "wrong" lift angle in the machine only influences the amplitude reading very little, as in 2 degs per one of difference. If one has low amplitude as the OP mentioned, can't blame that.

You are correct of course, missed the fact it's not a vintage Seiko ? The last one I worked on was a 1970's Seiko (and quite exotic - 5126A) which had a lift angle (as far as I could tell) of 56 and from what I read that's not rare (although, as mentioned, they usually have poor amplitude to begin with. Ended on 240 if I recall correctly). Changed the amplitude reading quite dramatically. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ManSkirtBrew
      1972 Bulova President "E" Sea King 11ACACB movement

      By ManSkirtBrew · Posted

      Unfortunately I'm not that lucky. I started on the train side and after I noticed the binding I pulled everything out except the driving wheel to rule everything else out. It still binds. I'm going to double check that the pinion is fully seated on the staff first, then if no joy I'll push the bridge jewel up a fraction of a mm. Fingers crossed!
    • Waggy
      Rado rotor removal

      By Waggy · Posted

      Happy to have helped, great way to start the day with a win! 🥳
    • doober
      Rado rotor removal

      By doober · Posted

      Thank you for the advise!! It worked. The setting screw was a lock/unlock to remove the rotor. 
    • GuyMontag
      1972 Bulova President "E" Sea King 11ACACB movement

      By GuyMontag · Posted

      I have that French tech sheet too, it is a little different than the English one (eg, it doesn't have the auto works diagram). BTW, it looks like you are looking up the case number in the 1979 ABC supplement. The 1974 ABC catalog does have the 3093 case. As you determined it takes the 1222-5 crystal.  When I serviced my President 'A' (which also takes that crystal), I was able to fit a 29.8 crystal from my DPA crystal assortment. Those are, in my opinion, a great deal. The assortment comes with 10 sizes each from 27.8mm to 32.4mm in 0.2 increments. I pretty much use them for any non-armored crystal that takes a high dome crystal. I think they no longer make them but Cousins has still has some in stock but when I bought them they were around $40 for the set and now they are around $100. Still, at 40 cents a crystal it's still a good deal. For the large driving wheel, I remember I once assembled the keyless/motion works first and when I placed the large driving wheel it was interfering with the setting wheel on the dial side as the teeth were not fully meshing and it wouldn't fully seat. If that isn't the issue I got nothing and am looking forward to see how you solve it 🙂
    • Waggy
      Rado rotor removal

      By Waggy · Posted

      Not sure, but just looking at it, it seems like the screw on the right may be a fake? The one on the left may not be a screw in the regular sense at all, rather a 2 position device, I think you need to point the slot towards either of the 2 dots and one will secure and one will open. Like I said this is just my best guess looking at the pictures.
×
×
  • Create New...