Jump to content

Smiths floating balance clock


HectorLooi

Recommended Posts

I finally managed to get my hands on a floating balance clock. It arrived on Christmas eve but I didn't open it until after New Year, just in case there were any Covid-19 variant virus stowed away on the packaging. ?

The clock is running and the chime is working. The clock case is in decent condition for its age but someone had applied a horrible layer of shellac over the original finish. The clock is running about 8 minutes slow a day, even with the regulator turned all the way to the right.

The movement inside also had the horrible shellac treatment done to it. Even the balance was not spared. All the Smiths floating balances I see on YouTube are a metallic grey, but this one is speckled with shellac. 

I don't know what's the best way to remove the shellac without damaging the balance. Can anyone advise me before I try soaking it in alcohol. 

20210104_203154.jpg

20210104_212820.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming it is shellac, and assuming that it is not a thick layer, then perhaps brushing it with alcohol on a small paint brush rather than soaking it might be a better way of removing it.

From the description it could be that someone sprayed it with a rattle can of acryllic clear coat, which may or may not be removed by alcohol. Try some your solvent on an area that isn't too important. Clear coat might require something more aggressive like acetone to remove it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shellac Lacquers are made by dissolving it into methylated spirits and is easy to remove from metal by using it use a cotton bud with not too much on. Spray on Lacquer depending on formulation can be removed with acetone or Xylene thinners some Lacquers are impervious to acetone and some are impervious to Xylene so it trial and error.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Andy might be correct. It might not be shellac but some kind of lacquer or varnish. I managed to get a lot of it off by dipping it in denatured alcohol and brushing it with a bristle brush. But it doesn't seem to be dissolving in the alcohol. I'll try xylene and acetone tomorrow. 

I just can't believe someone could spray lacquer on a balance wheel and even on the balance spring. ?

20210104_232249.jpg

20210104_232332.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the item wasn't working, then whoever owned it may simply have used it as a display piece, and in order to make it look its best (to their eye) they gave it a "nice shiny coat" of whatever inappropriate finish they had to hand.

The uniform nature of it makes me think it probably came out of a rattle can, in which case xylene (dimethylbenzene) or even something like butanone, also known as methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) might be necessary to dissolve it. All of the solvents I've suggested should be used in a well ventilated area. Also... wear gloves.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • people be honest.... Swatch is evil for the watchmakers and repairers, BUT not everything in watches from Switzerland is from the Swatch-Group. As far as i know, Selitta got sacked by Swatch as a Movement-Assembler for them and they started to produce Movements in their own Name with slight Modifications. As far as i know, they sell Parts to the Market for their Movements. In most cases, if a ETA-Movement fails, it is a valid Option to replace it with a Selitta Movement, which i consider the Solution for this Mess with the Swatch-Group...... I have no Connection to anybody at Selitta, but being a Swiss-Guy, i still like to have Swiss-Made Watches, but not from the Swatch-Group.   ok ? regards, Ernst
    • Just one more greedy act by Swatch. They started a number of years ago here in the US..cutting off supplies to watchmakers that could build complications that many Swatch houses couldn't even touch. Old school masters who had gone through some of the most prestigious houses in the world. Otto Frei has some statements on their page about it. I tell all my customers to avoid new Swiss watches like the plague,..unless they just want an older one in their collection that still has some parts out on the market, or they have really deep pockets and don't mind waiting months and paying through the nose to get it back. Plenty of others to choose from..IE Seiko,..or other non-swiss brands Even a number of Chinese brands are catching up with the Swiss,..and I think that in time, their actions will be their downfall
    • Yes. If that's not what you are experiencing...start looking for something rubbing. A 1st guess is that one of the hands is rubbing against the hole in the center of the dial. Especially if you now have lower amplitude in face up/ face down positions.
    • Once a movement has the dial and hands put back and it is recased, would you expect the assembled watch to have the same amplitude as when the movement is in a movement holder and is without hands and dial? Thanks
    • C07641+ not sure what the "+" is for after the last digit.
×
×
  • Create New...