Jump to content

Smiths Ty


Blacklab

Recommended Posts

Just finished refurbing a tired Smiths TY believed to be from 1965:

 

Before:

post-80-0-30550800-1427146755_thumb.jpg

 

After:

post-80-0-60806800-1427146786_thumb.jpg

 

Case, dial & hands cleaned. Crystal polished. Movement serviced & broken click spring replaced (thanks to John at Obsolete Clock & Watch Parts). New strap. The timegrapher readings were a little variable, however it kept good time all weekend.

 

I am getting a bit of a thing for Smiths (the watches, not the designer-misery band from the 1980's) and have got myself a 1960 Astral to do after the next Seiko.

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the kind words, here's the innards before servicing:

post-80-0-71797000-1427149363_thumb.jpg

 

note the broken click. I normally take picks of the breakdown only for reassembly reference, I must start taking pics of the finished movement as well.

 

The only reason I think its a 1965 watch as its partially shown in an ad from that year reproduced in the book 'Smiths Watches' by Barrie Smith.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The case was treated to 20 mins in the ultrasonic with crystal in place (glued) using washing up detergent, a bit of scraping with pegwood and a final buff with a Selvyt gold polishing cloth. The crystal was rubbed up with Polywatch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for posting the movement BL, it's a lot more basic than I had expected.

 

One up from the LY & 2 up from the RY as used in the Smiths Empire & Ingersol Triumph watches, made by the Anglo-Celtic Watch Co. (later called the Empire factory) in Wales - hence the 'Made in Great Britain' on the dial. The TY was produced in 1,5,7 or 21 jewel variants. The higher quality movements were produced in the Cheltenham factory & normally have 'Made in England' on the dial.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Thanks again to you all for the compliments. I finally got myself a couple of Smiths Astrals & will post results on a new thread soon.

That I'm looking forward to BL, they're one of my favourite watches! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Great Job Blacklab,

 

I also love Smiths watches and Pocketwatches. I have just got in 2 rather nice Smiths Watches for my collection. Will have to put some pics up tomorrow

 

 

Best Wishes

 

Darren

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Hello I have a couple of questions about this watch I also have this watch with the original strap and it’s in working order I’m finding it hard to find information about the watch this is the only thing I have found so far 

my first question is how much is the watch worth 

my second question is is it with getting refurbished 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a great job @Blacklab , really nice end result. Can I ask what technique / kit you used to clean the dial? It looks so much better (partly due to the crystal I expect but even so). Have you had it on a timegrapher? Just wondering what sort of figure you'd expect to get from one of these. My guess would be around +/- 1m a day would be a decent result?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ryan - Some Smiths go for silly money unfortunately these don't tend to go for too much, best keep an eye on flebay sold listings to give you an idea of the value. As for refurbishment I think the costs would far outweigh the value, I just do them for fun. 

Pip - thanks for the kind words. The dial was in good condition, just a bit dirty. Sometimes Rodico alone can be used but if particularly bad clean with a sable brush with the dial immersed alternately in lighter fluid then and a weak washing up detergent/water solution and finally rinsed in water then thoroughly dried. I have posted in the past more extreme cleaning methods that have proved successful, but extreme caution needs to be taken & I would not recommend anything other than the most gentle of dusting with a dry sable brush if the watch is of reasonable value. The watch is still in my collection although I haven't worn it for a while, when originally serviced it ran at +/- 20s a day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • An update, for everyone who contributed advice, and for those who come after with a similar problem. Based on the answers received, I decided to work on the face of the hammer first. I used a square degussit stone to guarantee a vertical surface to work against, and ground the face back until it was square across 90% of the depth. I was conscious of the risk of removing too much material.* After I'd got the shape how I wanted it, I polished the surface with lapping film. To cut a long story short, it did the trick and the hammer hasn't slipped off the cam since. Of course, that wasn't the end of my problems. Have a look at this video and tell me what you think is wrong. https://youtu.be/sgAUMIPaw98 The first four attempts show (0 to 34 sec.) the chrono seconds hand jumping forwards, the next two attempts (35 to 47 sec.) seem "normal", then on the seventh attempt (48 to 54 sec.) the seconds hand jumps to 5 sec. and the minute counter jumps to 1. The rest of the video just shows repeats of these three variants. I solved it by rotating the minute counter finger on the chronograph (seconds) runner relative to the cam.  I'd be interested to hear your opinions on that. It seemed to be the right thing to do, but maybe I've introduced another problem I'm not aware of. * What is the correct relationship between the two hammers and cams, by the way? Should both hammers strike the cams exactly at the same time, or is it correct for the minute counter hammer to be a bit behind the seconds hammer? In this picture, I removed the adjusting screw at 1, and the hammers are contacting the cams simultaneously at 3 and 4. I had to turn the screw down tight to achieve this condition after stoning the seconds hammer and replacing the bridge.
    • It was easy enough to pop off. Once I had the cannon pinion hanging on the blades of the stump, I got my #2 tweezers on the gear attached to the staff and levered it down. That way none of the force was on the brass wheel itself.   I reinstalled it and the bridge, and it looks like a small but reasonable amount of end shake. It also spins easily with a blower. It stops quickly, but I think that's due to the large shoulder and about what I'd expect from this wheel.  
    • Oh, right. For some reason I was picturing a monocoque case in my head. Good looking watch!
    • Well said Ross. My reason for the thread, i like many of us dont want to lose the forum, such a well knitted group of individuals i feel. But things can happen out of anyone's control. Would be nice to have something in place just in case, if anyone has any ideas please speak up. 
    • Ok thanks Ross, I will give that a try!😁
×
×
  • Create New...