Jump to content

High power readers for assembly/disassembly?


Recommended Posts

There's a BBC show on Netflix called "The Repair Shop" (or something along those lines). One of the people is a watchmaker that repairs all the mechanical things that come in. He wears his regular glasses and some high powered readers alternatingly on his head/eyes depending on the circumstance. Enough magnification, stereo vision, and available all the way up to 6x (as far as I've been able to find so far. Also, available for extremely cheap on Amazon (currently looking at a pair for $8). I can't say that I saw him actually using the readers for watch repair, but it seems like a good idea from a cursory glance. Has anyone tried this? Any reason it's not a good idea?

Edited by spectre6000
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never saw the show but I think I know what you are referring to.  Search for surgical binocular loupe or dental binocular loupe.  Is that what you are thinking of?  2x-4x, binocular and long working distance. 

My dentist and hygienist use something similar but I think theirs cost a lot more than $30-40.  The dentist's say Zeiss , the hygienist's are no name.  Anything Zeiss is way out of my price range. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think those confuse 3.5x with +3.5 diopter.  The Chinese sellers are not always accurate with their descriptions/translations. 

That said, my brother had to do some close in work and couldn't find his magnifier.  He stacked a couple pairs of reading glasses and got a better look at what he was working on.   Good enough in a pinch is what he said. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting... At 35, I'm not yet fully conversant in the nuances of reading glasses. I'd grab a pair at the grocery store to check the theory save the whole pandemic thing...

I found an article saying the conversion between power and diopter is diopter = 4 X power. So "6x" = 1.5X... I was thinking 3.5X would be about the sweet spot between magnification, working distance, and preservation of stereoscopy, so I'd need to find "14x"... I sorta doubt that's going to be found for <$10...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...Then I went and found high power readers that are [i]explicitly[/i] "6X/+24". All the way up to "12X/+48" in fact! They black out one eye, which makes sense. They go as high as 4X without blacking out one lens, which seems to check out from my own experimentation. So maybe the idea isn't dead yet.

Edited by spectre6000
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's been a full day and change on this. Enough for all the timezones represented here to chime in. The sole contention has been allayed, but I'm not seeing anyone in support of the idea either. This leaves me to think either a) I'm a brilliant and creative person full of novel ideas and notions (never mind the fact that I saw it on TV in nearly this exact application), or b) it's a dumb idea that won't work or it would be in common use the world over, and I'm a fool for even thinking the thought....

For $8 to my door via Amazon, if the "X" should be a "+" I can return them under the "incorrect specification" (or whatever the wording is), and it costs me nothing. I'll give it a shot and let you all know how it turns out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess we are the only two talking about this.  Sadly, I have 10 years experience in the reader department.  Your day will come.  My moment of realization that it was time was when I was putting a new exhaust system on a Jeep.  I couldn't focus on a nut for a clamp.  At first I blamed the concrete driveway for not allowing to move my head back far enough.  Then I blamed the lack of a lift kit on the Jeep not giving me enough distance.  Finally an older friend passed me his reading glasses and, problem solved.  $4 readers were a lot cheaper than a lift kit. 

I have tried the high power glasses available from Harbor Freight.  Not the best quality and they were a complete fail.  Working distance doesn't allow stereo view on the small watch scale.  Those were marked as 3x not +3.  The optical quality was terrible, in line with the price tag.  Loupes work fine for most things.  My Optivisor ( real one, made in USA) works fine but doesn't play nice my progressive glasses.  The Optivisor is great for disassembly, the magnification isn't enough for assembly.  The stereo microscope works great.  I can't express how much stereo vision is better than mono (loupe) vision.  I almost trashed a hairspring last night using a loupe.  Cat like reflexes, still have that, and vast experience trashing hairsprings saved me from destroying this one.  I should have set up the stereo microscope. 

This is my way of saying just skip the cheap solutions and go straight to the good stuff.  A good quality loupe, a real Optivisor, and a stereo microscope will be your friends.  My stereo microscope is an Amscope that I scored on Amazon for $40.  Normally they are in the $100-125 range.  $200+ for the long working distance model. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh yeah, a stereo microscope is a given. If it weren't for the guy on the show using what look like regular old readers, I wouldn't even be considering this. Most of the time I'm just using a 3.5X clip on loupe. Readers seem easier, wider field of vision, and possibly stereo. Seems like a major win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

I know this thread is 3 years old, but the conventional wisdom in using a loupe is with both eyes open. So if you are far sighted you should be using readers with a clip on loupe on your dominant eye. That way you can refocus on items on your bench without having to lift your loupe and putting on the readers. If you use high power readers (above 2x) then you are looking at everything close up and would have to take the high power ones off and put regular readers on to see at a close distance. I keep my readers (the ones without the loupe) on looking through the microscope and that way when I come out of the scope I can refocus immediately on grabbing a screwdriver or tweezers of the correct shape, etc. Then back to the scope. Much more efficient and less eye strain.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stereomicroscope is the answer, as it turns out. The high powered reader idea was a bust. I tried a bunch of things trying to avoid the cost of the microscope. The cost on that solution is down to something like $400 on Ali-X if memory serves. Worth it. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks, This watch was in a box of old scrape units that a friend gave me. They used to be his late father's who was a watchmaker before the war and then continued later in life. I picked this one out as it looked like it had potential, and I liked the dial, it's been a bit of a learning curve for a beginner but I was determined to get it going. Now I'm on the final lap it feels good. I'm just wondering whether to invest in a decent set of hand placement tools or stick with the cheap Chinese red thing I have, decisions decision 😆
    • An update, for everyone who contributed advice, and for those who come after with a similar problem. Based on the answers received, I decided to work on the face of the hammer first. I used a square degussit stone to guarantee a vertical surface to work against, and ground the face back until it was square across 90% of the depth. I was conscious of the risk of removing too much material.* After I'd got the shape how I wanted it, I polished the surface with lapping film. To cut a long story short, it did the trick and the hammer hasn't slipped off the cam since. Of course, that wasn't the end of my problems. Have a look at this video and tell me what you think is wrong. https://youtu.be/sgAUMIPaw98 The first four attempts show (0 to 34 sec.) the chrono seconds hand jumping forwards, the next two attempts (35 to 47 sec.) seem "normal", then on the seventh attempt (48 to 54 sec.) the seconds hand jumps to 5 sec. and the minute counter jumps to 1. The rest of the video just shows repeats of these three variants. I solved it by rotating the minute counter finger on the chronograph (seconds) runner relative to the cam.  I'd be interested to hear your opinions on that. It seemed to be the right thing to do, but maybe I've introduced another problem I'm not aware of. * What is the correct relationship between the two hammers and cams, by the way? Should both hammers strike the cams exactly at the same time, or is it correct for the minute counter hammer to be a bit behind the seconds hammer? In this picture, I removed the adjusting screw at 1, and the hammers are contacting the cams simultaneously at 3 and 4. I had to turn the screw down tight to achieve this condition after stoning the seconds hammer and replacing the bridge.
    • It was easy enough to pop off. Once I had the cannon pinion hanging on the blades of the stump, I got my #2 tweezers on the gear attached to the staff and levered it down. That way none of the force was on the brass wheel itself.   I reinstalled it and the bridge, and it looks like a small but reasonable amount of end shake. It also spins easily with a blower. It stops quickly, but I think that's due to the large shoulder and about what I'd expect from this wheel.  
    • Oh, right. For some reason I was picturing a monocoque case in my head. Good looking watch!
    • Well said Ross. My reason for the thread, i like many of us dont want to lose the forum, such a well knitted group of individuals i feel. But things can happen out of anyone's control. Would be nice to have something in place just in case, if anyone has any ideas please speak up. 
×
×
  • Create New...