Jump to content

Identifying clock


MechanicMike

Recommended Posts

Hi Michael  the name is derived from the fact that the almost friction free escapement and the slow rate coupled with a strong spring they would run for approx 400days  or also known as Anniversary clocks as they were wound once a year on their anniversary.  I have six of these and two quartz driven ones, They are interesting to work on but require patience as they are very touchy and must be level

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They had to be re-named to anniversary clocks due to the trades description act because if the clock went for 401 or only 399 days it could not be called a 400 day clock,  when the horrid quartz came in well it all went out the window because they don’t need winding up at all.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, clockboy said:

Perhaps I have been lucky I was just not aware of that. I have not had that issue but have had issues where even after fitting the correct spring it has proved to be too strong and I have had to thin the spring. In my experience with the 400 day clocks everything has to be spot on or it stalls after a day or two. 

I bet this one will be one of those clocks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, watchweasol said:

Hi Mike the best type of level is the ones used for leveling caravans which levels in two directions , front/back and side to side , There apps for the iphone which also double as levels  and are accurate I use both  double checking the clock and the bench plate..

I got a couple of them. A bullseye and small torpedo level. Explain caravans?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, watchweasol said:

I find it a bit strange that the clock has no leveling feet, as I have six of these clocks all of which have screw adjustable feet. These clocks rely on being perfectly level to work and the feet give you that adjustment.  I have never had to alter the length of the springs either All from Horolovar.  I would check the underside of the base for the feet they may just be screwed right up into the base and not be apparent.

Hi Weasol- this one doesn't have, or didn't have any feet when I got it. Just the base, and then the two columns bolted to it. I'll post a pic when I get a chance tomorrow. Otherwise I'm going to level it and put power to ms and see if I can time and reg it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair, you have picked one of the most difficult types of clocks to repair. In my time back in the 70's and 80's I new a few clockmakers who wouldn't touch the things. If you have been repairing clocks as long as I had it is quite common to have them in the workshop with no adjustable feet as I have explained above in one of my comments.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, oldhippy said:

To be fair, you have picked one of the most difficult types of clocks to repair. In my time back in the 70's and 80's I new a few clockmakers who wouldn't touch the things. If you have been repairing clocks as long as I had it is quite common to have them in the workshop with no adjustable feet as I have explained above in one of my comments.  

Yep I definitely read that. I remember when this arrived and with what little I knew I thought the feet were missing, until I got the book and began learning. I  was going to buy some only to find out these didn't have any. The weekend is almost here so I'll be getting after it after work. Sometimes, finding time is the problem. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, watchweasol said:

Hi Mike   yep  caravans in the UK  =   Trailers in the US,  The level is triangular in shape with two levels   I have anclosed a picture for you.

caravan level.jpg

That's kind of what I thought lol. But yes, I have levels almost like that, ready. Starting tonight I'll be leveling the carav... er I mean clock and I'll keep you posted unless you guys are getting bored with this one. I feel with y'alls help I'm soooo close! ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Mike   Its usually it is slightly out of beat or not quite level but believe me they take some setting up I have spent days at it..  I have a big Haller that I bought couple of days cleaning etc and a week and a half setting it up, some one had moved the pallet stones they were in plastic  friction mounts.  tried my patience

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, watchweasol said:

Hi Mike   Its usually it is slightly out of beat or not quite level but believe me they take some setting up I have spent days at it..  I have a big Haller that I bought couple of days cleaning etc and a week and a half setting it up, some one had moved the pallet stones they were in plastic  friction mounts.  tried my patience

Holee ...well I'm not too upset about it...yet. we'll see what I can find when I get back.  And does the escapement move that sloooooow? Wow not even used to that!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You poor blokes are in for the long haul of Mike trying to get this 400 day running! Ugh upon further inspection, the fork tines were definitely too tight around the anchor pin. It looks like they were bent on delivery. Just took a beater screwdriver and gave it a very slight tweak and presto- the escapement began to tic tock normally. I think that's where I was loosing everything. Right at the fork. Now, for the timing and regulation. Just by watching the pendulum swing it is out of beat and all but not terribly bad. I'm going to let it run awhile see where it lands. Oh and I also checked and re-leveled the "caravan" lol I love slight language differences ha? all others reading this or doing Anniversary clocks when someone mentions "has to be level" they are NOT kidding. At all.

So when I get this thing running, am I going to have to set this thing up again and level at the owner's house or what? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi guys.

@oldhippy might be the best to answer this but I presume others may know.

On the plans for the winder, there is a recess shown on one side of the clamp plates, Part H's. How deep should this be? As I have never seen a barrelled main spring on a clock, I don't know how deep to make this recess?

The other thing I have been thinking about is whether this winder can be used to let down a captured main spring that is held by a C clamp and not in a barrel?

Edited by Michael1962
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Mike  the distance between the forks is critical for operation too much and you loose travel too little and it binds, if you can slide a piece of paper between the fork and the impulse pin you are close and a smear of oil helps smooth delivery.

Regards the winder you can use it to release springs held in a "C" clamp using the appropriate holder to hold the loop but I find its best to wear a glove and control the release of the spring after the clamp is removed and conversly when rewinding to fit the clamp prior to fitting it in the movement.  Can you post a picture of the bit you mean regarding the "groove" , I copied the plans but cant remember where they are at the moment ( Old age)      cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Michael1962 said:

Hi guys.

@oldhippy might be the best to answer this but I presume others may know.

On the plans for the winder, there is a recess shown on one side of the clamp plates, Part H's. How deep should this be? As I have never seen a barrelled main spring on a clock, I don't know how deep to make this recess?

The other thing I have been thinking about is whether this winder can be used to let down a captured main spring that is held by a C clamp and not in a barrel?

What is it you need help with? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OK, welcome in the world of alarm clocks... I guess the 4th wheel is dished because it is from another movement. If it was not dishet, then it would not mesh with the pinion of the escape wheel, am I right? The marks of wear on the 4th wheel pinion doesn't corespond to the 3th wheel table position, at list this is what i see on the picts. Calculating the rate is easy - there is a formula - BR = T2 x T3 x T4 x T5 x 2 /(P3 x P4 x P5) where T2 - T5 are the counts of the teeth of the wheels tables, and P3 - P5 are the counts of the pinion leaves. Vibrating the balance is easy - grasp for the hairspring where it should stay in the regulator with tweasers, let the balance hang on the hairspring while the downside staff tip rests on glass surface. Then make the balance oscillate and use timer to measure the time for let say 50 oscillations, or count the oscillations for let say 30 seconds. You must do the free oscillations test to check the balance staff tips and the cone cup bearings for wear. This kind of staffs wear and need resharpening to restore the normal function of the balance.
    • Glue a nut to the barrel lid, insert a bolt, pull, disolve the glue.  Maybe someone will have a better answer. 
    • The stress is the force (on the spring) x distance. The maximum stress is at the bottom, and decreases up the arm. That's why they always break at the bottom. I used a round file, then something like 2000 grit to finish. I gave the rest of the arm a quick polish - no need for a perfect finish. Just make sure there are no 'notches' left from cutting/filing. The notches act like the perforations in your toilet paper 🤣
    • It's probably a cardinal rule for watch repair to never get distracted while at the bench. Yesterday, after finishing a tricky mainspring winding/barrel insertion (I didn't have a winder and arbor that fit very well) I mentally shifted down a gear once that hurdle was passed. There were other things going on in the room as I put the barrel and cover into the barrel closer and pressed to get that satisfying snap. But when I took it out I realized I never placed the arbor.  When opening a barrel, we are relying on the arbor to transfer a concentrically-distributed force right where it is needed at the internal center of the lid. However, when that isn't present it's difficult to apply pressure or get leverage considering the recessed position of the lid, the small holes in the barrel and the presence of the mainspring coils. It was a beat-up practice movement so I didn't take a lot of time to think it over and I pushed it out using a short right-angle dental probe placed in from the bottom, but that did leave a bit of a scratch and crease in the thin lid. I had also thought about pulling it using a course-threaded screw with a minor thread diameter smaller than the lid hole and a major diameter larger, but that may have done some damage as well.  Thinking about how this might have been handled had it been a more valuable movement, is there a method using watchmaking or other tools that should extract the lid with the least damage? 
    • 🤔 what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ? Making a small groove so the lubrication doesn't spread across the component but what if when lubing a little overspills and sits on the epilame .
×
×
  • Create New...