Jump to content

Hampden 16S Grade 110 'H' flag, circa 1898


Recommended Posts

Hi all

I'm trying to repair this one for an old Viet Nam marine buddy, who said it hasn't run since the day his grampa gave it to him just before he deployed. What I found was that the upper pivot of the balance staff was gone along with the balance cock upper hole jewel was cracked  and chipped. I was able to secure a NOS balance, staff and hairspring assembled, and lucky enough that all the jewels and fits were good. I added a new white alloy mainspring for the heck of it, cleaned and lubed everything. Assembled it and put some power to the mainspring to check it all over to find what I thought was excessive endplay. I took the balance back down and under the microscope to find it looks like the staff upper pivot(or the staff OAL) isn't long enough to fit, or reach into the upper jewel when assembled. Is that possible? is the hairspring collet not staked to the shoulder? (I haven't gotten that far). 

1) should I mic the staff overall length and try and find a longer one?

2) I see there are stake marks between the balance cock and base plate seemingly to raise it up or for binding issues. should I blend those down flush?

3) should I attempt to find a different balance/bridge/hairspring assy. and replace the whole thing?

it wants to run that's for sure and does intermittently, which, after all the work, is encouraging to me. I'm soooo close. Can I fix this?

much obliged-

Mike

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, MechanicMike said:

Hi all

I'm trying to repair this one for an old Viet Nam marine buddy, who said it hasn't run since the day his grampa gave it to him just before he deployed. What I found was that the upper pivot of the balance staff was gone along with the balance cock upper hole jewel was cracked  and chipped. I was able to secure a NOS balance, staff and hairspring assembled, and lucky enough that all the jewels and fits were good. I added a new white alloy mainspring for the heck of it, cleaned and lubed everything. Assembled it and put some power to the mainspring to check it all over to find what I thought was excessive endplay. I took the balance back down and under the microscope to find it looks like the staff upper pivot(or the staff OAL) isn't long enough to fit, or reach into the upper jewel when assembled. Is that possible? is the hairspring collet not staked to the shoulder? (I haven't gotten that far). 

1) should I mic the staff overall length and try and find a longer one?

2) I see there are stake marks between the balance cock and base plate seemingly to raise it up or for binding issues. should I blend those down flush?

3) should I attempt to find a different balance/bridge/hairspring assy. and replace the whole thing?

it wants to run that's for sure and does intermittently, which, after all the work, is encouraging to me. I'm soooo close. Can I fix this?

much obliged-

Mike

 

 

I would cut another balance that fits. Buying one is a gamble as it may never fit.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jdrichard said:

I would cut another balance that fits. Buying one is a gamble as it may never fit.

it's crossed my mind. I've been told that Hampdens are all over the board. Here I was worried that the pivots and jewel diameters wouldn't get along. I didn't anticipate OAL...? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, MechanicMike said:

it's crossed my mind. I've been told that Hampdens are all over the board. Here I was worried that the pivots and jewel diameters wouldn't get along. I didn't anticipate OAL...? 

make your own and you can adjust the heck out of it until it’s perfect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, MechanicMike said:

I see there are stake marks between the balance cock and base plate seemingly to raise it up or for binding issues. should I blend those down flush?

Thats what I do, if you assess removing the bumps would let the cock down enough for pivot to fully enter jewel hole, I,d give it a try. its easy, wont cost anything and levels the cock with gears bridge.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

17 hours ago, MechanicMike said:

should I attempt to find a different balance/bridge/hairspring assy. and replace the whole thing?

did you notice when you are working on the watch that their serial numbers on all of the plates? There is even usually a serial number on the balance wheel. This is because American pocket watches initially even though there's a parts book even though interchangeability was supposed to exist the parts are usually hand fit. A lot of it depends on which company did the manufacturing and when they were manufactured. So it's usually a bad idea to start swapping parts between different movements.

18 hours ago, MechanicMike said:

should I mic the staff overall length and try and find a longer one

a important rule to remember when replacing balance staffs is to always measure the old one versus the new one. This way you avoid unpleasant surprises. A lot of times with American pocket watches the modern replacement staffs are deliberately made over size. This is because it's easier to reduce things to fit than it is to add on to your staff. So it's very important to measure before putting it in.

then a watchmaker lathe unfortunately on American pocket watches isn't an absolute must but just about. Even if you got the right staff you also find that the watch companies made staffs with the same part number with different pivots sizes. So you might have to reduce a pivots size or reduce the length sometimes they were made longer than ever supposed to be so you could fit them.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

Thats what I do, if you assess removing the bumps would let the cock down enough for pivot to fully enter jewel hole, I,d give it a try. its easy, wont cost anything and levels the cock with gears bridge.

you're right. I planned on it. Will it remove enough to lower the cock enough to engage pivot? time will tell..I just haven't got to it yet. I'll let you know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

did you notice when you are working on the watch that their serial numbers on all of the plates? There is even usually a serial number on the balance wheel. This is because American pocket watches initially even though there's a parts book even though interchangeability was supposed to exist the parts are usually hand fit.

I sure did and only a couple matched. there were plenty of service marks so that tells me parts have been exchanged in this thing already long before I got to it. 

 

5 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

a important rule to remember when replacing balance staffs is to always measure the old one versus the new one.

correct. when I opened it up the first things I found was that the upper pivot was destroyed down past the cone(it was gone and not inside the movement), and the upper hole jewel was cracked in half under the cap jewel and chipped badly. probably dropped. so there was nothing to measure. i was guessing from the start. 

 

5 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

then a watchmaker lathe unfortunately on American pocket watches isn't an absolute must but just about. Even if you got the right staff you also find that the watch companies made staffs with the same part number with different pivots sizes. So you might have to reduce a pivots size or reduce the length sometimes they were made longer than ever supposed to be so you could fit them.

I'm no stranger to lathes and I can almost envision a watchmakers lathe in my future. That is, if I can come up with the cabbage to buy one. I'd love to have one. Even a used one if there is such a thing. a worthy one anyway. 

I'm working with a retired watchmaker who I've bought from before, who claims he is the one-stop shop for Hampden-Dueber parts, that he inherited the lot from two company-assigned watchmakers that stayed behind when Hampden moved to Russia. I'm just waiting to hear back from him, see if he's got answers and/or parts. he lives down in Canton, OH. Until then, I'm going to blend down the staking marks I found as Nucejoe recommended and see maybe if  that might be enough to engage pivot to jewels. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, jdrichard said:

make your own and you can adjust the heck out of it until it’s perfect.

then, there's the dilemma of removing old staff from balance to install a new one and I'd need a lathe for that too! this repair is growing legs just as I sit here and type! ?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Update: I polished  down the staking marks on the plate and the underside of the balance cock, and that did the trick. I've got some new matched jewels coming too for the heck of it. Might as well while I'm at it. Thanks everybody. My bud is going to be really happy. And I can breathe again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've seen some really nice early 20th century pieces where all the jewels, including center wheel, were convex. Definitely to reduce friction. It can be quite hard to tell if a jewel has olive holes, especially on small sizes, but that again reduces friction- as well as accommodates small misalignments better. Why they aren't used more often? I imagine it was found that at a certain point in the train the actual advantage became negligible, and the added cost on high production movements is why it's not seen on those, just higher-end pieces.   I did an experiment on a little 5x7"' AS 1012 a few years back. These things run OK sometimes, but often are absolute dogs. And AS made gajillions of them. I had a NOS novelty watch in for a service, ran OK flat, massive drop in amplitude vertical. Made like 3 staffs for it trying different pivot sizes, no change. Tried high quality (not Seitz) convex/olive jewels, no change- the original were flat, but could have been olive hole. Same for the pallet fork, then escape wheel, no change. Probably had 20 hours in the watch, new staff and new hole jewels through the escape wheel, no difference in running. Just a dog of a movement. But if I were making a watch I would use them, just because.
    • When Nicklesilver mentioned the use of them on non coned pivots on older high end watches closer to the escapement.  That suggested to me  probably fourth wheels and possibly third wheels. The square shoulder rotatating on the much smaller surface area of a dome as opposed to a flat jewel surface. I'm curious as to why they are not used predominantly?
    • That's what I thought, but as I said, it makes sense. See if any of our pros will have something to add.
    • Kind of guessing here watchie with a bit of logic.
    • Canon with FE 4612a movement. Day and Date display Trying something new. Although is will take some time for me to start, I have a back injury that is very painful and so cannot concentrate. Set myself a target to begin mid May. Purchased a Canon wrist watch with  FE 4612a movement. Advertised with Rotor missing. Arrived, took photographs. Strap broken, removed and place in bin. Back removed. No rotor. Wind is stiff. Can wind up. Everything moves ok. Oscillates for under a minute, then stops. No rotor but all wheels appear the be there. Have sent for a donor movement FE4612. No day wheel.  I have taken basic photographs up to the point of service commencement. I will try a new format and use the record system on the microscope to show the full disassembly subsequent assembly. I will photograph the cleaning process.  Whilst I have no intention beginning a YouTube channel, I would like to begin to make a better record of my work standard. Work to do.  Make case to a better standard. Repair crystal. Replace strap.  Only a thought. I will try to insert an English day wheel. Not sure if it can be done, but hey, what can I lose. Got to stop now, back so sore.
×
×
  • Create New...