Jump to content

My first watch clean & rebuild


Recommended Posts

I thought I'd share my first ever mostly successful watch clean & rebuild. Not without it's moments, I have a healthy respect for the springs now having managing to lose then find the click spring twice! I also must have managed to bend the post to which the second hand attaches, perhaps when I removed it. Is there a way a complete amateur could fix this without destroying the watch? I went gentle on cleaning the face and it retains its patina of whats likely a bit of dampness from long ago. Sadly I can't wear it currently as the crystal keeps popping off.

Does anyone have any tips or tricks that I could use to keep the crystal on? It's set in a plastic ring.

Lastly does anyone know the history of "Relide" watches? I've never heard of them until now.

 

relide1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It has a nice, classic look to it, but I can't say I've heard of Relide before now.

As to springs going airborn and parts leaping into the unknown, it happens sometimes. I've been known to just grab the Dust Buster hand vacuum and put a piece of nylon pantie hose over the inlet, and hope for fhe best.

As to your loose crystal, sometimes they just aren't pressed all the way in.  But if you're sure that it is, there is this stuff called "G-S Hypo Cement".  You'd only need a tiny amount.  But first, I assume the movement loads through the back?

As to the bent second hand pivot...um...darn...bad juju there.  If it were me, I'd load the wheel in my Jacot tool and prop the bent end in the right-sized groove of one of the runners, and very, very, VERY gently and slowly use the polished side of a small screwdriver or tool to carefully straighten it.  I'd carefully heat it a bit as I go too.  But for all that, it could still break.  You may get lucky; you may not.

You could always make do without a second hand until you happen upon a duplicate donor movement.  That may be the easiest (abeit slowest) and best solution.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does it say 21 Jewels on the dial? What is the diameter of the movement?

Also, my guess is that the Seconds Hand Pivot was bent when you placed the movement upside down (without the Dial installed). That's why i never use such pad as shown on your photo. Get yourself Bergeon 4040 movement holder and never place a watch face down with the dial being removed.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks both for your comments and advice. 

KarlvonKoln, I'll hunt down a tube of that glue, it may help, certainly worth a go. The movement loads in from the front. The crystal is mounted in a thin plastic ring, which is pressed on. When you think it's all clipped in place it then pops itself off when it feels like it. I'll bear the vacuum trick in mind too.

I'm just starting out and I don't have any of that sort kit you have, the search is already on for a donor....

Poljot, I've gone over my photos again and under the balance it is marked with looks like a "P" in a shield with the number "320". Yes it does say "21 jewels" on the face and on the movement. Do you know if this is a commonly found movement with available spares?

You've also had me thinking, as to how the seconds hand pivot got bent and I think you're probably right. A beginners mistake, but something to learn by for sure. As they say you learn by your mistakes. I do have a movement holder, one of those cheap ones from the far east, it functions. However it does drive me nuts sometimes as it won't sit level on the table. I'll add a Bergeon 4040 to my Christmas list.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Bearman said:

Poljot, I've gone over my photos again and under the balance it is marked with looks like a "P" in a shield with the number "320". Yes it does say "21 jewels" on the face and on the movement. Do you know if this is a commonly found movement with available spares?

You've also had me thinking, as to how the seconds hand pivot got bent and I think you're probably right. A beginners mistake, but something to learn by for sure. As they say you learn by your mistakes. I do have a movement holder, one of those cheap ones from the far east, it functions. However it does drive me nuts sometimes as it won't sit level on the table. I'll add a Bergeon 4040 to my Christmas list.

 

 

It could be Peseux 320 movement inside. You can upload one photo if you would like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bearman said:

I'm just starting out and I don't have any of that sort kit you have, the search is already on for a donor....

Poljot, I've gone over my photos again and under the balance it is marked with looks like a "P" in a shield with the number "320". Yes it does say "21 jewels" on the face and on the movement. Do you know if this is a commonly found movement with available spares?

If your movement is indeed Peseux 320, then you've got several options and will have to take some accurate measurement before ordering your part(-s):

https://www.cousinsuk.com/category/filter/peseux-movement-parts

 

Does this movement below look similar to yours?

https://www.catawiki.com/l/24286723-accurist-swiss-made-peseux-320-21-jewels-33-mm-gold-plated-g10-men-1960-1969

Edited by Poljot
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've dug through my photos. Hopefully you can make out the marks?

 Thanks for the links.

It does look very similar, less the branding and colour. Perhaps "Relide" had some sort of connection to "Accurist" the styling cues of the face are in the same vein. The date in the link fits too there are two service marks scratched inside the back which suggest 1972, so many thanks for that.

 

 

P320.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bearman said:

I've dug through my photos. Hopefully you can make out the marks?

 Thanks for the links.

It does look very similar, less the branding and colour. Perhaps "Relide" had some sort of connection to "Accurist" the styling cues of the face are in the same vein. The date in the link fits too there are two service marks scratched inside the back which suggest 1972, so many thanks for that.

I believe this is your movement:

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&&2uswk&Peseux_320

Hands
1.30 x 0.80 / 0.21mm

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Poljot, thanks for another useful link in looks like an absolute mine of info. Yes I would certainly agree with you it's a Peseux 320. I do have another question. What does "Hands" refer to? Is it the dimensions of the pivot that the second hand fit to? Thanks again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Bearman said:

Poljot, thanks for another useful link in looks like an absolute mine of info. Yes I would certainly agree with you it's a Peseux 320. I do have another question. What does "Hands" refer to? Is it the dimensions of the pivot that the second hand fit to? Thanks again

Glad to help!

Your guess is absolutely correct: Hour, Minute & Seconds Hand pivot hole diameter.

Here is just an example how you select correct hands for your movement or even for the actual Watch Case ID:

https://www.cousinsuk.com/product/baton-pairs-straight

As you can see, in addition to hole diameter you will need to know the Length of each hand.

Edited by Poljot
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bearman said:

Slowly beginning to get the hang of this. Quite pleased my guess was along the right lines, without any prior knowledge. I've learnt something, which can't be a bad thing. Another valuable resource for me browse. Cheers

https://www.cousinsuk.com/category/hands-watch

Probably this link gives you even more info. You can also download Parts List for your movement, if it is available using the same website, but "document search" page:

https://www.cousinsuk.com/document

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

By way of an update, I managed to find a donor movement on that well known auction site. A Peseux 320, with Accurist branding. It had the key part I needed plus it provided another movement for me to practice on, without being too nervous about mangling something else.

So the second hand is proudly back where it belongs and ticking away nicely. Truly an achievement, for me anyway with my limited skills.

Thanks again Poljot, your help's encouraged me on.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • in general this shouldn't be any change. but in general questions like this it be nice to know the specifics of the watch in other words how was it performing before it was cased up and what is it doing now.
    • just as a reminder this watch is a Swatch group product. This will bring up a problem like spare parts and technical information. that I found some links to some information on when I talk about your watch and some of the technical and basically your watch is equivalent to 2834-2 for which I'm attaching the technical sheets. But equivalent does not mean exactly the same you want to do a search on the group for C07 as we discussed this watch before including the technical differences how it's supposed to be regulated and basically because it's watch group there is no parts availability. https://calibercorner.com/eta-caliber-c07-xxx/   https://www.chrono24.com/magazine/eta-movements-from-the-2824-2-to-the-powermatic-80-p_80840/ https://www.watchuseek.com/threads/h-10-movement-details.4636991/ eta CT_2834-2_FDE_481857_15.pdf
    • people be honest.... Swatch is evil for the watchmakers and repairers, BUT not everything in watches from Switzerland is from the Swatch-Group. As far as i know, Selitta got sacked by Swatch as a Movement-Assembler for them and they started to produce Movements in their own Name with slight Modifications. As far as i know, they sell Parts to the Market for their Movements. In most cases, if a ETA-Movement fails, it is a valid Option to replace it with a Selitta Movement, which i consider the Solution for this Mess with the Swatch-Group...... I have no Connection to anybody at Selitta, but being a Swiss-Guy, i still like to have Swiss-Made Watches, but not from the Swatch-Group.   ok ? regards, Ernst
    • Just one more greedy act by Swatch. They started a number of years ago here in the US..cutting off supplies to watchmakers that could build complications that many Swatch houses couldn't even touch. Old school masters who had gone through some of the most prestigious houses in the world. Otto Frei has some statements on their page about it. I tell all my customers to avoid new Swiss watches like the plague,..unless they just want an older one in their collection that still has some parts out on the market, or they have really deep pockets and don't mind waiting months and paying through the nose to get it back. Plenty of others to choose from..IE Seiko,..or other non-swiss brands Even a number of Chinese brands are catching up with the Swiss,..and I think that in time, their actions will be their downfall
    • Yes. If that's not what you are experiencing...start looking for something rubbing. A 1st guess is that one of the hands is rubbing against the hole in the center of the dial. Especially if you now have lower amplitude in face up/ face down positions.
×
×
  • Create New...