Jump to content

Platax tool


AshF

Recommended Posts

I'm going to attempt my first balance staff removal and replacement.  I've read what I can and have watched a few videos.  Now I'm looking for the tools I'll need.  I see that you can buy a cheap roller remover, sorted.  But why doesn't anyone make a Platex tool anymore?  I see you can remove the staff with a staking set and a tool to fit over the balance to protect it, what's this tool called and where can I get one from?

Oh and, what ever you do, don't search for "Platex" on ebay...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plenty of watchmakers replace staffs still. The preferred method of removal (as taught in school) is to turn away the hub in the lathe, which allows the staff to come out the rivet side with little effort. Knocking the staff through, even with the aid of a Platex or K&D tool, risks opening the hole in the balance by forcing the expanded rivet through. It's worse with softer balances, but always a risk. Some pros stick with the Platex (or K&D), and seem to do OK. I personally prefer to turn off the hub.

 

The Platex wasn't cheap to begin with, but has been out of production for some time, thus the high prices.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

The preferred method of removal (as taught in school)

it probably depends upon what school you go to as one of the schools I went to their favorite tool was this one found at the link below. it appears to be no longer in the Bergeon catalog so I assume it was discontinued also. Probably because it's rather expensive.

https://www.nielsmachines.com/de/verkauft-bergeon-5478-mofres-balance-staff-remove.html

I suspect what you're seeing with Swiss tools is the perception of what they perceive is needed. In other words the perception is that people are no longer changing balance staffs in modern watch repair because they just replacing the balance complete.

4 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

Knocking the staff through, even with the aid of a Platex or K&D tool, risks opening the hole in the balance by forcing the expanded rivet through. It's worse with softer balances, but always a risk. Some pros stick with the Platex (or K&D), and seem to do OK. I personally prefer to turn off the hub.

knocking the staff out only works some of the time. You have to understand what you're doing when you using the tools.  my experiences with the K&D tool it would also apply to the other one. basically what it is if you attempt to knock the staff out and it shows resistance then you have to have a  lathe. Especially when you get in the vintage watches for a variety of reasons the rivet is extreme and driving it out is not in the best option.

one of the schools I was that the instructor showed how before knocking out input the balance in the  lathe and you just weaken the rivet. He always had perfect success with that but if you're an instructor in a classroom you get really good at doing balance staffs.

Then unfortunately especially if you're doing vintage watches you going to need a lathe. Often times staffs have to be modified or pivots have to be refinished.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you turn away the hub or use a Molfres to grind it away, both are the same preserving methods of removing a staff.

19 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

Some pros stick with the Platex (or K&D), and seem to do OK

I suppose they never saw the picture below or don't care. On discussion with such a pro in US who insisted in punching staffs out - said this is taught by WOSTEP - , I sacrificed a valuable NOS balance wheel  (I have plenty of). It shows, not just the rivet but the staff body, too, is distorted by rivetting.

IMG_1149b.jpg.e98efa1ab449bcf9a315b924a0beb140.jpg

Frank

Edited by praezis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

it probably depends upon what school you go to as one of the schools I went to their favorite tool was this one found at the link below. it appears to be no longer in the Bergeon catalog so I assume it was discontinued also. Probably because it's rather expensive.

https://www.nielsmachines.com/de/verkauft-bergeon-5478-mofres-balance-staff-remove.html

 

 

Ha, they had that at WOSTEP, I stuck with turning off the hub but the instructors really liked that machine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nickelsilver said:

Ha, they had that at WOSTEP, I stuck with turning off the hub but the instructors really liked that machine.

sometimes I like to joke that I was a slow learner and went to two schools.

Schools of horology and their tools conceivably could make for a multi-paragraph discussion. Seemingly this should be a simple subject but it’s not as I think there’s a whole variety of influences not always apparent if you’ve only been exposed to one school.

For instance if you are at the above mentioned school they would be doing training watches. The same watches over and over again until you are perfect and then you found out you are not perfect enough. This is where a nifty tool to grind the hub off works really well. It works fast and there’s no damage to the balance wheel unless of course somebody wasn’t paying attention. But don’t worry they have a infinite supply of spare parts.

Unfortunately that nifty tool is expensive and what about if your school is in America would it be filled with expensive Swiss tools probably not. Although I do love a fuzzy memory that there may have been a Platex tool on the instructors bench just too long ago to remember.

Then other thing is of amusement for me in that a variety of companies have made balance staffs specifically designed to have the rivets break off. Unfortunately unless you’re paying attention you will not necessarily know which staffs there were but both Hamilton and Elgin had staffs specifically designed to be driven out. Rolex even as a staff that’s meant to be pushed out.

always interesting people's methods that work for them but seemed totally ill logical to other people. then unfortunately all of the methods described above can be bad..

 

Edited by JohnR725
the problems of dictation software having a mind of its own
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Mark changed the title to Platax tool

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks Dell. I thought about silver soldering. Have never done it but would like to give it a go. Do you think to put flux on the butted joint then run the solder in or to maybe brace it with a piece of scrap spring steel?
    • Never and others. Yes, like you I do spend a fair amount of time reading the contents of this forum. I find it better that any other. Clear, lucid, no Prima Donas, and most of all an easy access without adverts. All thanks to Mark. God bless you mate. You give so much to many of us. What if? No Mark? Hypothetically. A forum. I did run a forum for a few years. Really enjoyed it, but became so engrossed that it did affect my health. I gave to to others to run. Not been back. It was very successful and rivalled a number of large paying sites. No adverts, no others but me. I did ask and listen to members comments and it worked well.    Costs Having a domain name, £10 annually.  Register the site with a forum company, free. Build the site using the forum company guide lines, free. It looked and ran almost the same a Mark's. All the same facilities. The cost was only £5 per month, but counted visits (views). If I recall, it was that price for 5,000 views. Each extra 5,000 views increased the price by £2 per month. Success was my own personal undoing. From £5 per month initially, it rose to £60 a month and looked like increasing. This was 10 years ago. I could not afford that, and asked it anyone would like to take over and someone did. I would assume that this is the price that Mark is funding for us all. His return is our continued comments on the internet about his course, and the fact that many of the big names on YouTube mention him as their Tutor. Those of us who have done, and are still using, his course, benefit. In comparison to other courses, I can't believe how cheap it is, and the value is exceptional. It is the structure that gives the value. Long may Mark reign. Ross  
    • Hi all, total newbie to watchmaking and I've had a bit of a mishap. Just completing level 2 and was doing ok, but I was just on the last part of the reassembly of my ST3620 when the balance end stone shot across the room, just as I was trying to see if I had put the correct amount of oil between it and the balance end, aarrrgh! Been on my hands and knees combing the carpet for 20mins looking for it but to no avail. Does anybody know where I can get a replacement from and what to look for please?? Thanks.
    • Get someone local to tig it ,very easy fix and should only take a few minutes so probably wouldn’t cost much ,or failing that get it very clean and silver solder it. Dell
    • Hi, The winding pin is not split, well that's how it was when I obtained the watch. The movement is front-loaded and here's a picture of where the case screws are fitted. The face picture is before I dismantled it. Quick update.  I've always had a nylon ring sitting in the parts try that I wasn't sure where it went and left it to the last thing as I know it must be part of the case assembly. Anyway, looking at the picture in my last post you can see, just under the winding stem, a white-looking object, this is the nylon ring 🤭 So, I had to remove the dial again and replace the ring. Once this was all back together I placed the movement in the case and realized my initial problem maybe is not a problem as it looks like I can screw the movement back in the case and then place the hands as the dial is nearly flush with the outside of the case anyway so I'll be able to check for alignment. if all is good then just fit the crystal and bezel 🤔 I can't think of any issues with this approach but please comment if you think I've not thought of something. Another lesson learned as well. Take more pictures not just of the movement parts and location 😅
×
×
  • Create New...