Jump to content

Opening clock mainspring barrel


HectorLooi

Recommended Posts

After careful consideration, I think solder would not work very well for this repair. The solder joints would be subjected to strain, which caused the barrel to crack in the first place and we know solder joints fail under strain. 

I'm thinking of banding the barrel with a steel strap which is placed with some tension. I'm thinking of using a steel zip tie, if there is sufficient space between the barrel and the 2nd wheel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/25/2020 at 3:16 PM, oldhippy said:

Did the cracks start to open when you installed the spring? if not then it should be OK. 

I installed the spring back inside the barrel yesterday and checked it this morning. The copper wire band is still holding.

But now I have a new problem with this clock. The strike mainspring is going to break at the eye. Is it possible to cut off the end and cut a new eye or should the spring be replaced?

20201126_225004.jpg

20201126_224932.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apart from that end if the spring is in good condition you can as you put it cut a new eye.

There is a tool you can buy that will punch a hole in clock mainsprings. I preferred to do it the way my master used to do it. Cut the damaged part off and file it flat and filing rounded corners on the end.   You will need to heat around where the new hole is going to be until it is bright red then quench it in old oil or water. You then punch a few holes in it close together and then with needle files file it out into a shape like a pear so the narrow part fits onto the eye in the barrel. Make sure you file the entire burr away you do not want rough edges rubbing together as this will cause wear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks OH.

I cut off the end and rounded off the sharp corners, then annealed about an inch of the spring. Then I traced the outline of the hole and used a high speed dental carbide bit to cut out the hole. 

This clock seems to have all sorts of hidden faults. I wonder what's next.

20201127_132205.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's very interesting information. I haven't tried to see if my bombé jewel holes have olive holes but I think I should be able to tell on the larger jewels at least. See if I get a chance to have a look later today. This little story was very comforting to read for a "bungler" like myself. That success isn't a given even for a pro. Thanks for sharing!
    • I forgot that I said I would do that. Will take some tomorrow and post them up post haste.
    • I've seen some really nice early 20th century pieces where all the jewels, including center wheel, were convex. Definitely to reduce friction. It can be quite hard to tell if a jewel has olive holes, especially on small sizes, but that again reduces friction- as well as accommodates small misalignments better. Why they aren't used more often? I imagine it was found that at a certain point in the train the actual advantage became negligible, and the added cost on high production movements is why it's not seen on those, just higher-end pieces.   I did an experiment on a little 5x7"' AS 1012 a few years back. These things run OK sometimes, but often are absolute dogs. And AS made gajillions of them. I had a NOS novelty watch in for a service, ran OK flat, massive drop in amplitude vertical. Made like 3 staffs for it trying different pivot sizes, no change. Tried high quality (not Seitz) convex/olive jewels, no change- the original were flat, but could have been olive hole. Same for the pallet fork, then escape wheel, no change. Probably had 20 hours in the watch, new staff and new hole jewels through the escape wheel, no difference in running. Just a dog of a movement. But if I were making a watch I would use them, just because.
    • When Nicklesilver mentioned the use of them on non coned pivots on older high end watches closer to the escapement.  That suggested to me  probably fourth wheels and possibly third wheels. The square shoulder rotatating on the much smaller surface area of a dome as opposed to a flat jewel surface. I'm curious as to why they are not used predominantly?
    • That's what I thought, but as I said, it makes sense. See if any of our pros will have something to add.
×
×
  • Create New...