Jump to content

This is real class


oldhippy

Recommended Posts

I wouldn't mind having this wonderful small clock. From what I can see the movement hasn't been changed in anyway. Wonderful photos of a super clock. Just not quite happy about the bottom hing on the door. 

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/SMALL-GEO-II-EBONY-VENEERED-TABLE-CLOCK-C-1740/124438516669?hash=item1cf91d13bd:g:wRMAAOSwvthfnHMm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, KarlvonKoln said:

OMG!  That's just friggin' beautiful!!!  Clean and well cared for.  And all the engraving work everywhere you look!  I can see why they'd want 2,275 pounds for it.  That's art.

That is is the starting bid price. 

It should be in a specialized sale I can only assume the seller doesn’t want to pay a high commission. I wouldn’t be surprised if it doesn’t sell or meet its reserve. £3000 - £4000 I would say is about right.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi OH

What a stunning clock,  A couple of questions.

1. Is what appears at first to be a seconds hand in fact used to regulate the clock as it appears to be connected to the top of the suspension spring.

2. Is the crescent on the front there to give a representation of the pendulum.

3. What is the purpose of the wheel on the back plate with a cord attached, a repeat function maybe ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are right about the hand at the top notice how thick it is and very basic a sign of a early regulating clock hand

The crescent is showing what is called a false pendulum, it moves in the same way as the pendulum but you cannot regulate the time by it is merely for show. Many clocks have this.

The wheel on the back that has a pull cord attached is as you say a repeat of a sort. You would pull the cord in the middle of the night and it will tell you the time depending on the play of the hammers that it would give you, at the same time the spring would auto wind back up making the cord short again. If you look at the photos of the movement the barrel with pins fixed to it houses the spring.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are lucky here in the UK we are full of clocks of all types. I have been very fortunate  to have restored some very expensive pieces. I've lost count how many Longcase clocks I have repaired or restored. Anything with a battery to me is crap.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's very interesting information. I haven't tried to see if my bombé jewel holes have olive holes but I think I should be able to tell on the larger jewels at least. See if I get a chance to have a look later today. This little story was very comforting to read for a "bungler" like myself. That success isn't a given even for a pro. Thanks for sharing!
    • I forgot that I said I would do that. Will take some tomorrow and post them up post haste.
    • I've seen some really nice early 20th century pieces where all the jewels, including center wheel, were convex. Definitely to reduce friction. It can be quite hard to tell if a jewel has olive holes, especially on small sizes, but that again reduces friction- as well as accommodates small misalignments better. Why they aren't used more often? I imagine it was found that at a certain point in the train the actual advantage became negligible, and the added cost on high production movements is why it's not seen on those, just higher-end pieces.   I did an experiment on a little 5x7"' AS 1012 a few years back. These things run OK sometimes, but often are absolute dogs. And AS made gajillions of them. I had a NOS novelty watch in for a service, ran OK flat, massive drop in amplitude vertical. Made like 3 staffs for it trying different pivot sizes, no change. Tried high quality (not Seitz) convex/olive jewels, no change- the original were flat, but could have been olive hole. Same for the pallet fork, then escape wheel, no change. Probably had 20 hours in the watch, new staff and new hole jewels through the escape wheel, no difference in running. Just a dog of a movement. But if I were making a watch I would use them, just because.
    • When Nicklesilver mentioned the use of them on non coned pivots on older high end watches closer to the escapement.  That suggested to me  probably fourth wheels and possibly third wheels. The square shoulder rotatating on the much smaller surface area of a dome as opposed to a flat jewel surface. I'm curious as to why they are not used predominantly?
    • That's what I thought, but as I said, it makes sense. See if any of our pros will have something to add.
×
×
  • Create New...