Jump to content

Issue with Seiko Premier Perpetual Calendar


east3rn

Recommended Posts

Hello dear watchmakers.

I have a Seiko watch in "Premier" line, SNP003.

This watch is powered by Cal. 7D48-0AA0 Kinetic movement with perpetual calendar.

One day, I noticed that on midnight between October 30th and October 31st, the date changed to 1 instead of 31.

The month indicator went from October to November.

I thought reinstalling the month indicator hand to one month backwards might fix the problem but I am not quite sure.

What should I do in this case??

Thank you ?

0027_1985291_1.jpg.9b9398616a655b8585a6a606837efdf9.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello east3rn this watch has a perpetual calendar , there are instructions on youtube for programing or resetting your watch , not advisable to tinker with hands as this will throw settings out .Here is the manual that will show how to set.https://storage.seikowatches.com/production/files/2018/03/20/143340135354/pdf/SEIKO_7D56c.pdf May need battery change .hope this helps

Edited by Graziano
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Graziano said:

not advisable to tinker with hands as this will throw settings out

on the surface it seems like moving the hand would solve the problem except this is a perpetual watch. If you look at calendars over the years there's variations. Otherwise we'd only need one calendar forever. The perpetual watch providing it's properly  set knows what each calendar is for each year. Your  perpetual watch has lost its setting or somebody did a battery change and didn't follow the proper setting procedure and just set the watch to time and didn't set the  year would be quite common.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/6/2020 at 1:57 AM, JohnR725 said:

on the surface it seems like moving the hand would solve the problem except this is a perpetual watch. If you look at calendars over the years there's variations. Otherwise we'd only need one calendar forever. The perpetual watch providing it's properly  set knows what each calendar is for each year. Your  perpetual watch has lost its setting or somebody did a battery change and didn't follow the proper setting procedure and just set the watch to time and didn't set the  year would be quite common.

 

On 11/5/2020 at 9:27 PM, Graziano said:

Hello east3rn this watch has a perpetual calendar , there are instructions on youtube for programing or resetting your watch , not advisable to tinker with hands as this will throw settings out .Here is the manual that will show how to set.https://storage.seikowatches.com/production/files/2018/03/20/143340135354/pdf/SEIKO_7D56c.pdf May need battery change .hope this helps

I tried setting the watch following the manual.

However, I noticed that the year indicator changes on February instead of January.

In this case, would it be necessary to reinstall the hand?

Thank you:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, east3rn said:

 

I tried setting the watch following the manual.

However, I noticed that the year indicator changes on February instead of January.

In this case, would it be necessary to reinstall the hand?

Thank you:)

Hi, I am certain that this these settings can be individually adjusted unless someone has already played with the hands. Maybe the watch was repaired at some stage. Anyway you could remove hands and replace at the right adjustment. Take a photo of what you do in case your not happy with result. Also be very careful of the dial on these seikos do not apply pressure between 9 and 3 hope this helps. 

Edited by Graziano
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Graziano said:

Maybe the watch was repaired at some stage

 

1 hour ago, Graziano said:

Hi, I am certain that this these settings can be individually adjusted unless someone has already played with the hands.

I think a lot of watch repair people fail to grasp just how complicated perpetual calendar watches can be. I've attached the service manual it's broken into a whole bunch of pieces. Even talks about replacing the hands it's a very complicated procedure. The hands are supposed in a very exacting position for all of this to work if they are not where there supposed to be it's going to be a problem.

 

7D46-7D48_Eng.pdf 7D46A,7D48A_4.pdf 7D46A,7D48A_3.pdf 7D46A,7D48A_2.pdf 7D46A,7D48A_1.pdf

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

 

I think a lot of watch repair people fail to grasp just how complicated perpetual calendar watches can be. I've attached the service manual it's broken into a whole bunch of pieces. Even talks about replacing the hands it's a very complicated procedure. The hands are supposed in a very exacting position for all of this to work if they are not where there supposed to be it's going to be a problem.

 

7D46-7D48_Eng.pdf 918.56 kB · 0 downloads 7D46A,7D48A_4.pdf 4.41 MB · 0 downloads 7D46A,7D48A_3.pdf 2.08 MB · 0 downloads 7D46A,7D48A_2.pdf 1.51 MB · 0 downloads 7D46A,7D48A_1.pdf 2.4 MB · 0 downloads

2 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

 

 

Hi there Mr JohnR725 yes and are very hard to get back on correct to time,and synced. If the watch has not been serviced or repaired then there should be no reason to take the hands off. It should be able to be done via settings. And if it's solar powered, the dials are brittle as I have no doubt you would already know. I see this one is kenetic 

 

Edited by Graziano
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Graziano said:

Hi there Mr JohnR725 yes and are very hard to get back on correct to time,and synced. If the watch has not been serviced or repaired then there should be no reason to take the hands off. It should be able to be done via settings. And if it's solar powered, the dials are brittle as I have no doubt you would already know. I see this one is kenetic 

 

 

5 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

 

I think a lot of watch repair people fail to grasp just how complicated perpetual calendar watches can be. I've attached the service manual it's broken into a whole bunch of pieces. Even talks about replacing the hands it's a very complicated procedure. The hands are supposed in a very exacting position for all of this to work if they are not where there supposed to be it's going to be a problem.

 

7D46-7D48_Eng.pdf 918.56 kB · 0 downloads 7D46A,7D48A_4.pdf 4.41 MB · 0 downloads 7D46A,7D48A_3.pdf 2.08 MB · 0 downloads 7D46A,7D48A_2.pdf 1.51 MB · 0 downloads 7D46A,7D48A_1.pdf 2.4 MB · 0 downloads

I really appreciate all of your advice.

I will look over the manual and try reinstalling the hands if it is necessary.

Hopefully I will come back with good news ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello everybody, sorry for the late reply. Thank you all so much for your help and your tips. I got lucky and found a replacement wheel bridge for cheap which actually ended up being in decent condition. I decided not to do anything about the mainspring barrel pivot since I didn't have the right tools and the barrel didn't have much endshake anyhow. I am happy to report that the watch now runs great, I have regulated it to about +-10/s day which is fine by my standards. The timegrapher result looks decent as well, although beat error is around 0.6ms which could be better I suppose. Amplitude reaches over 230 quite consistently which I'm happy with also. My lighter fluid has also been replaced by balance spring cleaning solution and now the springs don't stick to themselves anymore - who would have thought. I'm super happy with this watch, it might not be worth a whole lot but it's awesome that I could restore it and it makes me wear it with pride. To me it's a genuinely good lucking watch, it'll be my daily driver for a while. Thanks again to everybody for their input! I couldn't have done the repair without your help.   Here are some images for those interested, the bracelet isn't original but I don't really mind:    
    • Balance-hairspring system is oscillator with big Q-factor. When all in the movement is OK, the rate (frequency) is verry close to the own resonant frequency of the balance-hairspring. But in some cases, the movement (with foult) will force the resonator to work on pritty different frequency, sometimes faster, and sometimes slower. When this happens, the amplitude is always weak. So, the first thing to ask is what is the amplitude. If it is more than 180 and the hairspring doesn't touch itself and anything else, then for sure it is 'short'. If the amplitude is weak, then the first thing to do is to understand why and rectify the problem. At this time no point to check timekeeping. But, if one doubts that the hairspring is not correct, then He needs to calcullate the rate of the movement, then to 'vibrate' the balance-hairspring out of the movement and to measure the free oscillations frequency (period) with timer in order to ensure that they comply with the rate. If we have pictures, then it will be easier to tell something about that wheel.
    • So much work has gone into this! Thanks again @Jon. I will go back and check my adjustments from last weekend. A few questions for you, if you don't mind. In the reset position, I can understand the problem if the gap between the hammer and the minute counter heart is too big (slide 77) but what is bad about both hammers being in contact with the cams (slide 76)? I read somewhere that Landeron recommended grease on the runner cam, but the minute counter heart should be dry. Is that so, and why? How many tads in a ligne?
×
×
  • Create New...