Jump to content

Make setting lever spring


canthus

Recommended Posts

I am having trouble sourcing setting lever springs for older watch movements.  Either they are not available anywhere or economically not viable, so I thought I might try and make my own.  I have most of the drills, files stones etc but don't really know what steel material I need.  I know about tempering and hardening etc, so just need advice on readily obtainable material.  Maybe thicker stock than final form as easier to work with but any help from the many sages on this forum is appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hacksaw blades are good source of steel but I've never tried a set lever bridge.

Thought about it and if I had no other option I would

1. Mark out the piece on the hacksaw blade stock.

2. Drill the holes and triple check that they are correct (this includes the bit which 'clicks' when you pull the crown).

3. Drill the inside corners.

4. Drill holes along the perimeter so that you can cut between them.

5. Rough shape using a dremel and Hand-file to finished shape.

6. Thin down to correct size.

 

Good luck and share if you've managed to maked one!

Anil

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your ideas.  Wire is unlikely to work as I am talking about a flat plate bridge type spring.  I have plenty of small hacksaw blades and also some unused feeler gauges which may do the job. Not sure if my HSS drills would work on these materials, so would I need to anneal it first to soften it, or would carbide drills work without softening?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

O1 or 1095 would be good choices. It's available in numerous thicknesses, generally with 1095 having more options in the thin sizes, you'd have to check suppliers in your area to see what they offer. It's quite hard to find it in the very thin thicknesses useful for watch parts, except in the already heat treated state. You can anneal it though, which would make working it far easier.

 

Just a quick look and I found these guys, https://springsteelstock.co.uk/ they say that they are "the small order specialists" which sounds very encouraging, and they offer 1095 from 0.1mm to over 1.5mm in thickness- I'd try them out. They say it's generally offered in heat treated state but that implies that they can sell it annealed as well. For watch work 0.3mm and 0.4mm would cover 90% of what you might want to make.

 

I would stay away from hacksaw blades, they are often a mix of HSS and carbon steel, I don't think it would anneal very well and would be a bear to heat treat.

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most helpful nickelsilver.  I know this company from my working days, they are a large distributor of sheet steel.  Their single sheet may be far too big for me.  I'll get my beans in a row re thickness etc and may drop them an email to see if they can let me have a small sample or off-cut FOC,  you never know!! I see they do an annealed stainless spring steel which may be suitable.

Edited by canthus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A friend of mine in the U.S. contacted a supplier some years back for 1095 and when they figured out what he wanted the guy said look, why don't we send you some "samples"; I think they wanted to help my friend but to actually sell him the quantity he needed would have been too much hassle haha. He's still using what they sent!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone have any experience of what colour you would take a plate/cover type set lever spring to, to make it durable as a spring. Smiths are notorious for broken set lever springs and I think that relates to the tempering.

I did have a beautiful Patek Philippe movement a while back which had a graduated colour change on the set lever spring which at the very least looked impressive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Problem with working with thin steel is that its quite difficult to get to shape.. especially for a set lever bridge which has the 'spring' portion built into it. That's why I think its easier to start with a thicker piece and get the shape correct and then thin it down to the correct thickness.

If anyone has done this please share!

Anilv

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I make parts like this (frequently) I start with stock as close to the desired finished thickness as possible. 2 or 3 hundredths of a millimeter is plenty for finishing. Taking more than that off is a long process, and there's the possibility that it gets thinned unevenly.

 

The old school technique for a set bridge would be to shellac/glue/soft solder the old part with the broken bit in place to the metal stock. Now you can drill through the original holes, and with a jeweler saw and files it's pretty quick work to shape it up using the original as your template. When you're happy with it remove the original and heat treat.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/1/2020 at 3:30 AM, rodabod said:

Smiths are notorious for broken set lever springs and I think that relates to the tempering.

The main issue is shape, not tempering. Spring arms notorious of breaking are usually too thick and/or too short and their form ignores the internal torque. 

Frank

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all your ideas and thoughts, several options for me to explore.  Have to put on the back burner for a while as other priorities at the moment.  Will post my failures/successes in due course, but still open for suggestions/techniques etc.

I think the shape reverts back to the old engineering gremlin of stress raisers which could be shape, radii in corners, scratchy finishes etc etc so will pay due attention to these and probably try and polish these areas a bit.  Would a wiggly shaped arm (spring part) be better than a straight arm ????

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OK, welcome in the world of alarm clocks... I guess the 4th wheel is dished because it is from another movement. If it was not dishet, then it would not mesh with the pinion of the escape wheel, am I right? The marks of wear on the 4th wheel pinion doesn't corespond to the 3th wheel table position, at list this is what i see on the picts. Calculating the rate is easy - there is a formula - BR = T2 x T3 x T4 x T5 x 2 /(P3 x P4 x P5) where T2 - T5 are the counts of the teeth of the wheels tables, and P3 - P5 are the counts of the pinion leaves. Vibrating the balance is easy - grasp for the hairspring where it should stay in the regulator with tweasers, let the balance hang on the hairspring while the downside staff tip rests on glass surface. Then make the balance oscillate and use timer to measure the time for let say 50 oscillations, or count the oscillations for let say 30 seconds. You must do the free oscillations test to check the balance staff tips and the cone cup bearings for wear. This kind of staffs wear and need resharpening to restore the normal function of the balance.
    • Glue a nut to the barrel lid, insert a bolt, pull, disolve the glue.  Maybe someone will have a better answer. 
    • The stress is the force (on the spring) x distance. The maximum stress is at the bottom, and decreases up the arm. That's why they always break at the bottom. I used a round file, then something like 2000 grit to finish. I gave the rest of the arm a quick polish - no need for a perfect finish. Just make sure there are no 'notches' left from cutting/filing. The notches act like the perforations in your toilet paper 🤣
    • It's probably a cardinal rule for watch repair to never get distracted while at the bench. Yesterday, after finishing a tricky mainspring winding/barrel insertion (I didn't have a winder and arbor that fit very well) I mentally shifted down a gear once that hurdle was passed. There were other things going on in the room as I put the barrel and cover into the barrel closer and pressed to get that satisfying snap. But when I took it out I realized I never placed the arbor.  When opening a barrel, we are relying on the arbor to transfer a concentrically-distributed force right where it is needed at the internal center of the lid. However, when that isn't present it's difficult to apply pressure or get leverage considering the recessed position of the lid, the small holes in the barrel and the presence of the mainspring coils. It was a beat-up practice movement so I didn't take a lot of time to think it over and I pushed it out using a short right-angle dental probe placed in from the bottom, but that did leave a bit of a scratch and crease in the thin lid. I had also thought about pulling it using a course-threaded screw with a minor thread diameter smaller than the lid hole and a major diameter larger, but that may have done some damage as well.  Thinking about how this might have been handled had it been a more valuable movement, is there a method using watchmaking or other tools that should extract the lid with the least damage? 
    • 🤔 what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ? Making a small groove so the lubrication doesn't spread across the component but what if when lubing a little overspills and sits on the epilame .
×
×
  • Create New...